This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Poverty, Undernutrition and Vulnerability in Rural India: Public Works versus Food Subsidy Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Raghbendra Jha
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
This paper analyses the effects of access to Rural Public Works (RPW) and the Public Distribution System (PDS), a public food subsidy programme, on consumption poverty, vulnerability and undernutrition in India drawing, on the large household datasets constructed with National Sample Survey (NSS) data, 50th round in 1993-1994 and 61st round in 2004-2005. The treatment effects model and propensity score matching (PSM) model are used to take account of the sample selection bias in evaluating the effects of RPW or PDS on poverty.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Paper provided by esocialsciences.com in its series Working Papers with number
id:1907.
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 2009Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:1907Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.esocialsciences.com
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Padma Prakash).
Keywords: NSS ; national sample survey ; poverty ; undernutrition ; vulnerability ; Rural Public Works (RPW) ; Public Distribution System (PDS) ; poverty reduction policy ; treatment effects model ; Propensity Score Matching (PSM) model ; India ; Other versions of this item:
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports :
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: Raghbendra Jha & Raghav Gaiha, 2003.
"Determinants of Undernutrition in Rural India ,"
Departmental Working Papers
2003-06, Australian National University, Economics RSPAS.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Heckman, James J, 1979.
"Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error ,"
Econometrica ,
Econometric Society, vol. 47(1), pages 153-61, January.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Rajeev H. Dehejia & Sadek Wahba, 2002.
"Propensity Score-Matching Methods For Nonexperimental Causal Studies ,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics ,
MIT Press, vol. 84(1), pages 151-161, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Rajeev H. Dehejia & Sadek Wahba, 1998.
"Propensity Score Matching Methods for Non-experimental Causal Studies ,"
NBER Working Papers
6829, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Dehejia, R.H. & Wahba, S., 1998.
"Propensity Score Matching Methods for Non-Experimental Causal Studies ,"
Discussion Papers
1998_02, Columbia University, Department of Economics.
Rajeev H. Dehejia & Sadek Wahba, 2002.
"Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies ,"
Discussion Papers
0102-14, Columbia University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!] Todd, Petra E., 2008.
"Evaluating Social Programs with Endogenous Program Placement and Selection of the Treated ,"
Handbook of Development Economics ,
Elsevier.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Dasgupta, Partha, 1997.
"Nutritional status, the capacity for work, and poverty traps ,"
Journal of Econometrics ,
Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 5-37, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Raghav Gaiha & Ganesh Thapa & Katsushi Imai & Vani S. Kulkarni, 2007.
"Endowments, discrimination and deprivation among ethnic groups ,"
The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series
0722, Economics, The University of Manchester.
[Downloadable!]
Bhalotra, Sonia, 2002.
"Welfare Implications of Fiscal Reform: The Case of Food Subsidies in India ,"
Working Papers
UNU-WIDER Research Paper , World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
[Downloadable!]
Foster, Andrew D, 1995.
"Nutrition and Health Investment ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 85(2), pages 148-52, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Besley, Timothy & Coate, Stephen, 1992.
"Workfare versus Welfare Incentive Arguments for Work Requirements in Poverty-Alleviation Programs ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 82(1), pages 249-61, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Sascha O. Becker & Andrea Ichino, 2002.
"Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores ,"
Stata Journal ,
StataCorp LP, vol. 2(4), pages 358-377, November.
[Downloadable!]
Dehejia, Rajeev, 2005.
"Practical propensity score matching: a reply to Smith and Todd ,"
Journal of Econometrics ,
Elsevier, vol. 125(1-2), pages 355-364.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Shubham Chaudhuri & Jyotsna Jalan & Asep Suryahadi, 2002.
"Assessing household vulnerability to poverty from cross-sectional data: A methodology and estimates from Indonesia ,"
Discussion Papers
0102-52, Columbia University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Verbeek, Marno & Nijman, Theo, 1992.
"Can Cohort Data Be Treated as Genuine Panel Data? ,"
Empirical Economics ,
Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 9-23.
Other versions:
Full
references
Access and
download statistics Did you know? Over five million full texts a year are downloaded through IDEAS.
This page was last updated on 2009-11-13.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .