IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/enp/wpaper/eprg1715.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contractual Framework for the Devolution of System Balancing Responsibility from the Transmission System Operator to Distribution System Operators

Author

Listed:
  • Seung Wan Kim

    (Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge -aEnergy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB1 1AG, UK bElectric Power Network Economics)

  • Michael G. Pollitt

    (Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge)

  • Young Gyu Jin

    (Power System Economics Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, Jeju National University, Jeju-island, Republic of Korea)

  • Jip Kim

    (Electric Power Network Economics Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University, bElectric Power Network Economics Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University, 1 Gwan)

  • Yong Tae Yoon

    (Electric Power Network Economics Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The goal of this research is to trigger the devolution of the system balancing responsibility entirely belonging to the transmission system operator (TSO) to several local distribution system operators by fairly allocating system balancing cost based on a cost-causality principle. Within the devolved system balancing scheme, distribution system operators (DSOs) have appropriate motivation for reducing the variability and uncertainty caused by units in their own area. As the number of renewable electricity sources (RES) being connected to the local distribution system increases, it would be advantageous for the TSO to share the increasing burden of the system balancing responsibility with multiple DSOs. To achieve this, we suggest that, first DSOs be designated as the representatives of their own jurisdictions with primary economic responsibility for balancing payments that are originally charged to each energy market participant. Second, this research proves that a cost-causality based cost allocation scheme(CC-CAS) is superior to an energy-amount based cost allocation scheme (currently widely used) in terms of economic efficiency. Additionally, to avoid the side effect that a DSO with a large amount of RES may face a high and risky balancing payment under the CC-CAS, this research also proposes an optimal balancing payment insurance (BPI) contract which helps the DSO hedge the risks associated with uncertain balancing payments.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Seung Wan Kim & Michael G. Pollitt & Young Gyu Jin & Jip Kim & Yong Tae Yoon, 2017. "Contractual Framework for the Devolution of System Balancing Responsibility from the Transmission System Operator to Distribution System Operators," Working Papers EPRG 1715, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    • Handle: RePEc:enp:wpaper:eprg1715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/eprg-wp1715.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Ambec & Lars Ehlers, 2016. "Regulation via the Polluter‐pays Principle," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(593), pages 884-906, June.
    2. Seung Wan Kim & Jip Kim & Young Gyu Jin & Yong Tae Yoon, 2016. "Optimal Bidding Strategy for Renewable Microgrid with Active Network Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tangerås, Thomas, 2020. "Competition for Flexible Distribution Resources in a ’Smart’ Electricity Distribution Network," Working Paper Series 1351, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    2. Anaya, Karim L. & Pollitt, Michael G., 2020. "Reactive power procurement: A review of current trends," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Bert Willems & Juulia Zhou, 2020. "The Clean Energy Package and Demand Response: Setting Correct Incentives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Anaya, K. & Pollitt, M., 2018. "Reactive Power Procurement: Lessons from Three Leading Countries," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1854, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    5. Yi, Ji Hyun & Cherkaoui, Rachid & Paolone, Mario & Shchetinin, Dmitry & Knezovic, Katarina, 2022. "Expansion planning of active distribution networks achieving their dispatchability via energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aouss Gabash & Pu Li, 2016. "On Variable Reverse Power Flow-Part II: An Electricity Market Model Considering Wind Station Size and Location," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Aleksandar Zaklan, 2023. "Coase and Cap-and-Trade: Evidence on the Independence Property from the European Carbon Market," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 526-558, May.
    3. Abdul-Salam, Yakubu & Kemp, Alex & Phimister, Euan, 2022. "Energy transition in the UKCS – Modelling the effects of carbon emission charges on upstream petroleum operations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Dieter Schmidtchen & Jenny Helstroffer & Christian Koboldt, 2021. "Regulatory failure and the polluter pays principle: why regulatory impact assessment dominates the polluter pays principle," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(1), pages 109-144, January.
    5. Muhyaddin Rawa & Abdullah Abusorrah & Yusuf Al-Turki & Saad Mekhilef & Mostafa H. Mostafa & Ziad M. Ali & Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem, 2020. "Optimal Allocation and Economic Analysis of Battery Energy Storage Systems: Self-Consumption Rate and Hosting Capacity Enhancement for Microgrids with High Renewable Penetration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Ang Sha & Marco Aiello, 2016. "A Novel Strategy for Optimising Decentralised Energy Exchange for Prosumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Athanasoglou, Stergios, 2022. "On the existence of efficient, individually rational, and fair environmental agreements," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Gabriel, Cle-Anne & Bond, Carol, 2019. "Need, Entitlement and Desert: A Distributive Justice Framework for Consumption Degrowth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 327-336.
    9. Mohammed M. Alhaider & Ziad M. Ali & Mostafa H. Mostafa & Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem, 2023. "Economic Viability of NaS Batteries for Optimal Microgrid Operation and Hosting Capacity Enhancement under Uncertain Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Maogang Tang & Ruihan Zhang & Zhen Li & Baijun Wu, 2021. "Assessing the impact of tradable discharge permit on pollution reduction and innovation: micro-evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16911-16933, November.
    11. J. Walter Milon, 2019. "The polluter pays principle and Everglades restoration," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(1), pages 67-81, March.
    12. Kong, Xiangyu & Liu, Dehong & Xiao, Jie & Wang, Chengshan, 2019. "A multi-agent optimal bidding strategy in microgrids based on artificial immune system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Aleksandar Zaklan, 2020. "Coase and Cap-and-Trade: Evidence on the Independence Property from the European Electricity Sector," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1850, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    14. Ambec, Stefan, 2022. "The European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Challenges and Perspectives," TSE Working Papers 22-1365, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    System Balancing Responsibility; Devolution Principle; Cost-causality Principle; System Balancing Cost Allocation; Risk Hedging Contract;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:enp:wpaper:eprg1715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ruth Newman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/jicamuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.