IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/80105.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Incorporating Driving Range Variability in Network Design for Refueling Facilities

Author

Listed:
  • de Vries, H.
  • Westerink-Duijzer, L.E.

Abstract

To stimulate and facilitate the use of alternative-fuel vehicles, it is crucial to have a network of refueling or recharging stations in place that guarantees that vehicles can reach (most of) their destinations without running out of fuel. Because initial investments in these stations are restricted, it is important to choose their locations deliberately. A fast growing stream of literature therefore analyzes the problem of locating refueling or recharging stations. The models proposed in these studies assume that the driving range is fixed, although reality shows that the driving range is highly stochastic. These models thereby misrepresent the actual coverage a network of refueling stations provides to drivers. This paper introduces two problems that do take the stochastic nature of the driving range into account. We first introduce the Expected Flow Refueling Location Problem, which is to maximize the expected number of drivers who can complete their trip without running out of fuel. The Chance Constrained Flow Refueling Location Problem is to maximize the number of drivers for which the probability of running out of fuel is below a certain threshold. We prove the problems to be strongly NP-hard, propose novel mixed-integer programming formulations for these problems, and show how these models can be extended to the case that the driving range varies during a trip. Furthermore, we extensively analyze and compare our models using randomly generated problem instances and a real life case study about the Florida state highway network. Our results show that taking the stochastic nature of the driving range into account can substantially improve the network coverage, that optimal solutions are highly robust with respect to data impreciseness, and that the potential gains of stochastic models heavily depend on the driving range distribution. Based on the results, we discuss policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • de Vries, H. & Westerink-Duijzer, L.E., 2016. "Incorporating Driving Range Variability in Network Design for Refueling Facilities," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-19, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:80105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/80105/EI2016-19.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Núñez Ares, J. & de Vries, H. & Huisman, D., 2015. "A Column Generation Approach for Locating Roadside Clinics in Africa based upon Effectiveness and Equity," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2015-19, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    2. Capar, Ismail & Kuby, Michael & Leon, V. Jorge & Tsai, Yu-Jiun, 2013. "An arc cover–path-cover formulation and strategic analysis of alternative-fuel station locations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 142-151.
    3. de Vries, H. & van de Klundert, J.J. & Wagelmans, A.P.M., 2014. "The Roadside Healthcare Facility Location Problem," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2014-09, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    4. Hosseini, Meysam & MirHassani, S.A., 2015. "Refueling-station location problem under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 101-116.
    5. Averbakh, Igor & Berman, Oded, 1996. "Locating flow-capturing units on a network with multi-counting and diminishing returns to scale," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 495-506, June.
    6. Yıldız, Barış & Arslan, Okan & Karaşan, Oya Ekin, 2016. "A branch and price approach for routing and refueling station location model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 815-826.
    7. Romm, Joseph, 2006. "The car and fuel of the future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(17), pages 2609-2614, November.
    8. Kuby, Michael & Lim, Seow, 2005. "The flow-refueling location problem for alternative-fuel vehicles," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 125-145, June.
    9. Ismail Capar & Michael Kuby, 2012. "An efficient formulation of the flow refueling location model for alternative-fuel stations," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 622-636.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Vries, Harwin & Duijzer, Evelot, 2017. "Incorporating driving range variability in network design for refueling facilities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 102-114.
    2. Arslan, Okan & Karaşan, Oya Ekin, 2016. "A Benders decomposition approach for the charging station location problem with plug-in hybrid electric vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 670-695.
    3. Tran, Trung Hieu & Nagy, Gábor & Nguyen, Thu Ba T. & Wassan, Niaz A., 2018. "An efficient heuristic algorithm for the alternative-fuel station location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 159-170.
    4. Kınay, Ömer Burak & Gzara, Fatma & Alumur, Sibel A., 2021. "Full cover charging station location problem with routing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-22.
    5. Mahmutoğulları, Özlem & Yaman, Hande, 2023. "Robust alternative fuel refueling station location problem with routing under decision-dependent flow uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 173-188.
    6. Joonho Ko & Tae-Hyoung Tommy Gim & Randall Guensler, 2017. "Locating refuelling stations for alternative fuel vehicles: a review on models and applications," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 551-570, September.
    7. Chung, Sung Hoon & Kwon, Changhyun, 2015. "Multi-period planning for electric car charging station locations: A case of Korean Expressways," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 677-687.
    8. Kuby, Michael & Capar, Ismail & Kim, Jong-Geun, 2017. "Efficient and equitable transnational infrastructure planning for natural gas trucking in the European Union," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 979-991.
    9. Ventura, Jose A. & Kweon, Sang Jin & Hwang, Seong Wook & Tormay, Matthew & Li, Chenxi, 2017. "Energy policy considerations in the design of an alternative-fuel refueling infrastructure to reduce GHG emissions on a transportation network," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 427-439.
    10. Göpfert, Paul & Bock, Stefan, 2019. "A Branch&Cut approach to recharging and refueling infrastructure planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 808-823.
    11. Trung Hieu Tran & Thu Ba T. Nguyen, 2019. "Alternative-fuel station network design under impact of station failures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 279(1), pages 151-186, August.
    12. Zhang, Anpeng & Kang, Jee Eun & Kwon, Changhyun, 2017. "Incorporating demand dynamics in multi-period capacitated fast-charging location planning for electric vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 5-29.
    13. Lee, Chungmok & Han, Jinil, 2017. "Benders-and-Price approach for electric vehicle charging station location problem under probabilistic travel range," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 130-152.
    14. Shaohua Cui & Hui Zhao & Cuiping Zhang, 2018. "Locating Charging Stations of Various Sizes with Different Numbers of Chargers for Battery Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Anjos, Miguel F. & Gendron, Bernard & Joyce-Moniz, Martim, 2020. "Increasing electric vehicle adoption through the optimal deployment of fast-charging stations for local and long-distance travel," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 263-278.
    16. Yıldız, Barış & Arslan, Okan & Karaşan, Oya Ekin, 2016. "A branch and price approach for routing and refueling station location model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 815-826.
    17. Lin, Cheng-Chang & Lin, Chuan-Chih, 2018. "The p-center flow-refueling facility location problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 124-142.
    18. Yıldız, Barış & Olcaytu, Evren & Şen, Ahmet, 2019. "The urban recharging infrastructure design problem with stochastic demands and capacitated charging stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 22-44.
    19. Hwang, Seong Wook & Kweon, Sang Jin & Ventura, Jose A., 2017. "Locating alternative-fuel refueling stations on a multi-class vehicle transportation network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 941-957.
    20. Xu, Min & Meng, Qiang, 2020. "Optimal deployment of charging stations considering path deviation and nonlinear elastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 120-142.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    facility location; stochastic models; recourse model; chance constraint; flow refueling; electric vehicle;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:80105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.