Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Land Reform and Productivity Gains with Multiple Market Imperfections

Contents:

Author Info

  • Pavel Ciaian

Abstract

This paper uses a model with transaction costs and imperfect competition in the land market to analyze the efficiency and welfare effects of land reforms. We show that removing only one imperfection may have very different efficiency and welfare effects than would otherwise result from reforms that reduce both imperfections. In extreme cases, partial reforms can actually lead to welfare losses. The welfare effects are affected by the size of transaction costs, relative farm productivity and farm land demand elasticities. Partial reforms also have important income distribution effects.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.eeri.eu/documents/wp/EERI_RP_2007_01.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels in its series EERI Research Paper Series with number EERI_RP_2007_01.

as in new window
Length: 54 pages
Date of creation: Feb 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:eei:rpaper:eeri_rp_2007_01

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Avenue de Beaulieu, 1160 Brussels
Phone: +322 299 3523
Fax: +322 299 3523
Email:
Web page: http://www.eeri.eu/index.htm
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Land market; transaction costs; imperfect competition; land reform; welfare effects;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Murphy, John A. & Furtan, W. Hartley & Schmitz, Andrew, 1993. "The gains from agricultural research under distorted trade," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 161-172, June.
  2. Sadoulet, Elisabeth & Janvry, Alain de & Davis, Benjamin, 2001. "Cash Transfer Programs with Income Multipliers: PROCAMPO in Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 1043-1056, June.
  3. Pavel Ciaian & Johan F.M. Swinnen, 2006. "Land Market Imperfections and Agricultural Policy Impacts in the New EU Member States: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(4), pages 799-815.
  4. Deininger, Klaus & Feder, Gershon, 2001. "Land institutions and land markets," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Elsevier, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 6, pages 288-331 Elsevier.
  5. Mathijs, Erik & Swinnen, Johan F M, 1998. "The Economics of Agricultural Decollectivization in East Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(1), pages 1-26, October.
  6. Aronsson, T. & Blomquist, S., 2000. "Optimal Taxation, Global Externalities and Labor Mobility," Papers, Uppsala - Working Paper Series 2000:15, Uppsala - Working Paper Series.
  7. Blackorby, Charles & Davidson, Russell & Schworm, William, 1991. "The validity of piecemeal second-best policy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 267-290, December.
  8. Bloch, Peter C., 2002. "Agrarian Reform In Uzbekistan And Other Central Asian Countries," Working Papers, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Land Tenure Center 12789, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Land Tenure Center.
  9. Robin Boadway & Richard Harris, 1975. "A Characterization of Piecemeal Second Best Policy," Working Papers, Queen's University, Department of Economics 195, Queen's University, Department of Economics.
  10. Chris Milner, 1992. "Second-best Rates of Effective Protection with Imperfect Substitution," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(1), pages 3-13, January.
  11. Lerman, Zvi & Sedik, David J., 2007. "Productivity And Efficiency Of Corporate And Individual Farms In Ukraine," Discussion Papers, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management 7130, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
  12. Lerman, Zvi & Sedik, David J., 2007. "Productivity and Efficiency of Corporate and Individual Farms in Ukraine," 2007 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon TN, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association) 9985, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
  13. Binswanger, Hans P. & Deininger, Klaus & Feder, Gershon, 1993. "Power, distortions, revolt, and reform in agricultural land relations," Policy Research Working Paper Series, The World Bank 1164, The World Bank.
  14. Emmanuel Skoufias, 1995. "Household Resources, Transaction Costs, and Adjustment through Land Tenancy," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 71(1), pages 42-56.
  15. Gorton, Matthew & Davidova, Sophia, 2004. "Farm productivity and efficiency in the CEE applicant countries: a synthesis of results," Agricultural Economics: The Journal of the International Association of Agricultural Economists, International Association of Agricultural Economists, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 30(1), January.
  16. Ulrich Koester, 2005. "A revival of large farms in Eastern Europe-how important are institutions?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(s1), pages 103-113, 01.
  17. Johan F. M. Swinnen, 1999. "The political economy of land reform choices in Central and Eastern Europe," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 7(3), pages 637-664, November.
  18. Scott Rozelle & Johan F.M. Swinnen, 2004. "Success and Failure of Reform: Insights from the Transition of Agriculture," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 42(2), pages 404-456, June.
  19. Gorton, Matthew & Davidova, Sophia, 2004. "Farm productivity and efficiency in the CEE applicant countries: a synthesis of results," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 1-16, January.
  20. Braverman, Avishay & Stiglitz, Joseph E, 1982. "Sharecropping and the Interlinking of Agrarian Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 72(4), pages 695-715, September.
  21. Vranken, Liesbet & Swinnen, Johan, 2006. "Land rental markets in transition: Theory and evidence from Hungary," World Development, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 481-500, March.
  22. Lerman, Zvi & Csaki, Csaba & Feder, Gershon, 2002. "Land policies and evolving farm structures in transition countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series, The World Bank 2794, The World Bank.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eei:rpaper:eeri_rp_2007_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Julia van Hove).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.