IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecr/col025/4355.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Legal and economic interfaces between antidumping and competition policy

Author

Listed:
  • Araújo, José Tavares de

Abstract

Introduction The interaction between antidumping and antitrust is a polemic issue in every integration process for both legal and economic reasons. From a legal perspective, antidumping rules allow practices such as price undertakings and quantitative trade restrictions that are forbidden by competition law, and punish certain types of price differentiation that are justifiable under the antitrust rules. From an economic viewpoint, the two policies pursue different objectives that eventually may lead to conflicting situations. Antidumping is a trade remedy for industries injured by import competition. The final goal of antitrust is to promote consumer welfare and productive efficiency, which in part depend upon market contestability, wherein import competition often plays a key role. This paper addresses several issues from three complementary perspectives. Section 2 summarizes the current debate about antidumping rules in the United States. This debate includes a large and growing academic literature that has been surveyed recently by Blonigen and Prusa (2001), papers and speeches by influential personalities such as Kenneth Dam, Alan Greenspan and Joseph Stiglitz, and the active participation of business associations, lawyers, lobbyists and politicians. This diverse collection of policy suggestions provides a normative background for the discussion in the rest of the paper. Section 3 reviews the instruments used by the European Union and the U.S. government for reconciling a strong enforcement of competition laws with an intense use of antidumping measures. Section 4 highlights some peculiarities of the FTAA process. Section 5 presents the main conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Araújo, José Tavares de, 2001. "Legal and economic interfaces between antidumping and competition policy," Comercio Internacional 4355, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col025:4355
    Note: Includes bibliography
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/4355
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Messerlin & Mathew Tharakan, 1999. "The Question of Contingent Protection," Post-Print hal-03416493, HAL.
    2. Thomas J. Prusa, 2021. "Why are so many antidumping petitions withdrawn?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Thomas J Prusa (ed.), Economic Effects of Antidumping, chapter 2, pages 1-20, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Dam, Kenneth W., 2001. "The Rules of the Global Game," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226134932, September.
    4. P. J. Lloyd & Kerrin M. Vautier, 1999. "Promoting Competition in Global Markets," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1483.
    5. Finger, J. Michael, 1998. "GATT experience with safeguards - making economic and political sense of the possibilities that the GATT allows to restrict imports," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2000, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feinberg, Robert M., 2006. "Exploring the patterns and determinants of U.S. antidumping actions against Latin American imports, 1980-2004," Comercio Internacional 4422, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. Kuwayama, Mikio, 2005. "Latin American South-South integration and cooperation: from a regional public goods perspective," Comercio Internacional 4390, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. Kuwayama, Mikio & Durán Lima, José Elías & Silva, Verónica, 2005. "Bilateralism and regionalism: re-establishing the primacy of multilateralism a Latin American and Caribbean perspective," Comercio Internacional 4401, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    4. Sáez, Sebastián, 2005. "Trade in services negotiations: a review of the experience of the United States and the European Union in Latin America," Comercio Internacional 4403, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    5. Izam, Miguel, 2003. "Rules of origin and trade facilitation in preferential trade agreements in Latin America," Comercio Internacional 4370, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    6. Sáez, Sebastián, 2005. "Implementing trade policy in Latin America: the cases of Chile and Mexico," Comercio Internacional 4396, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    7. Pérez Caldentey, Esteban, 2005. "Export promotion policies in CARICOM: main issues, effects and implications," Comercio Internacional 4398, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    8. Marconini, Mario A., 2006. "Services in regional agreements between Latin American and developed countries," Comercio Internacional 4414, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    9. Sáez, Sebastián, 2005. "Trade policy making in Latin America: a compared analysis," Comercio Internacional 4397, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maurizio Zanardi, 2004. "Antidumping law as a collusive device," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 37(1), pages 95-122, February.
    2. Bettina Becker & Martin Theuringer, 2000. "Macroeconomic Determinants of Contingent Protection: The Case of the European Union," IWP Discussion Paper Series 02/2000, Institute for Economic Policy, Cologne, Germany.
    3. Iscr, 2001. "Open to enterprise," Competition & Regulation Times 374006, New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    4. Martin Theuringer & Pia Weiss, 2001. "Do Anti-Dumping Rules Facilitate the Abuse of Market Dominance?," International Trade 0108002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Meredith A. Crowley, 2004. "Antidumping Policy Under Imperfect Competition: Theory and Evidence," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 443, Econometric Society.
    6. Nogues, Julio J. & Baracat, Elias, 2005. "Political economy of antidumping and safeguards in Argentina," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3587, The World Bank.
    7. Aradhna Aggarwal, 2003. "Patterns and determinants of anti-dumping: A worldwide perspective," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 113, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    8. Hylke Vandenbussche & Maurizio Zanardi, 2008. "What explains the proliferation of antidumping laws? [‘Antidumping Laws in the US; Use and Welfare Consequences’]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 23(53), pages 94-138.
    9. Michel DE VROEY, 2013. "What can civil society expect from academic macroeconomics?," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2013022, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    10. Anderson, Simon P. & Schmitt, Nicolas & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 1995. "Who benefits from antidumping legislation?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 321-337, May.
    11. Anguelov Nikolay, 2014. "Does the Presence of Multinational Corporations Affect a Country’s Gross Domestic Product?," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Colin A. Carter & Caroline Gunning-Trant, 2010. "U.S. trade remedy law and agriculture: trade diversion and investigation effects," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 43(1), pages 97-126, February.
    13. Robert M. Feinberg & Kara M. Reynolds, 2006. "The Spread of Antidumping Regimes and the Role of Retaliation in Filings," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 72(4), pages 877-890, April.
    14. Jan Baran, 2015. "The impact of antidumping on EU trade," IBS Working Papers 12/2015, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
    15. Cole, Matthew T. & Lake, James & Zissimos, Ben, 2021. "Contesting an international trade agreement," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    16. Rehbein, Kathleen & Starks, Laura T., 1995. "Changes in U.S. trade policies: the wealth effects on Japanese steel firms," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 309-327, September.
    17. Staiger, Robert W., 1995. "International rules and institutions for trade policy," Handbook of International Economics, in: G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 29, pages 1495-1551, Elsevier.
    18. Dobrin R. Kolev & Thomas J. Prusa, 2021. "Dumping and double crossing: The (in)effectiveness of cost-based trade policy under incomplete information," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Thomas J Prusa (ed.), Economic Effects of Antidumping, chapter 7, pages 129-152, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    19. Araújo, José Tavares de & Macario, Carla & Steinfatt, Karsten, 2001. "Antidumping in the Americas," Comercio Internacional 4338, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    20. Konings, Jozef & Vandenbussche, Hylke, 2008. "Heterogeneous responses of firms to trade protection," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 371-383, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col025:4355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.