This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Customer Compliance with Presumed Market Research Goals: Motivational Drivers of Negative Service Evaluations

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Ofir, Chezy (Hebrew U Jerusalem)
Simonson, Itamar (Stanford U)
Yoon, Song-Oh (Singapore Management U)
Abstract

The findings and value of market research depend critically on consumers' understanding of the research objectives and their roles. The present research presents a three-phase investigation of the impact of research participants' theories about their roles: (a) identifying the theories, (b) testing the process consequences of participants' role theories, and (c) gaining insights into the impact of participants' role theories by testing key moderator/s. We apply this approach to the finding that expecting to evaluate leads to more negative evaluations (Ofir and Simonson 2001). The findings of three studies indicate that (a) when forewarned of an upcoming evaluation task, consumers tend to believe that the research objective is to identify aspects that need improvement, (b) this expectation produces a conscious attempt to identify negative aspects, though the encoding of attribute information is not affected, and (c) cognitive load during the evaluation experience greatly decreases the negativity of expected evaluations. The present study can be applied to other market research techniques and thereby improve our understanding of consumer inputs derived from market research; such insights can help diminish biases produced by participants' correct or incorrect theories regarding their roles.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1962.pdf
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Stanford University, Graduate School of Business in its series Research Papers with number 1962.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Mar 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1962

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5015
Phone: (650) 723-2146
Fax: (650)725-6750
Email:
Web page: http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Friestad, Marian & Wright, Peter, 1994. " The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts," Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, University of Chicago Press, vol. 21(1), pages 1-31, June.
  2. Dhar, Ravi, 1997. " Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option," Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(2), pages 215-31, September.
  3. Ran Kivetz, 2005. "Promotion Reactance: The Role of Effort-Reward Congruity," Journal of Consumer Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(4), pages 725-736, 03. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can create a compilation of all publications of a group of people, say alumni of a program, your students or memers of an association.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-2.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.