This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Une méta-analyse des études d’évaluation monétaire par la méthode des prix hédoniques du coût externe des installations de traitement des déchets

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Benoît Chèze

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Cet article présente les résultats d’une méta-analyse dont le but est d’étudier les facteurs influençant les évaluations monétaires du coût externe des installations de traitement des déchets. Les décharges et les incinérateurs sont sources de nuisances importantes qui expliquent en partie l’opposition croissante face aux projets d’implantation de nouveaux sites. Une recherche bibliographique nous a permis d’identifier 12 études utilisant la méthode des prix hédoniques (toutes réalisées sur le continent nord-américain) pour estimer en termes monétaires le coût externe des installation de traitement des déchets. Cette méta-analyse est réalisée sur les 45 estimations fournies par ces études primaires. Une méta-analyse est une méthode de recherche quantitative utilisant des outils économétriques afin d’analyser les résultats d’un ensemble de travaux antérieurs portant sur une question donnée. Le premier but de cette communication consiste à mettre en avant une estimation monétaire moyenne du coût externe des installations de traitement des déchets. Le second but est d’étudier les facteurs influençant la variabilité des différentes estimations. Nous montrons que la distance, le revenu, les caractéristiques des installations de traitement des déchets, la spécification de la forme fonctionnelle de l’équation de prix hédonique et l’information publique expliquent en grande partie cette variabilité des différentes estimations.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://economix.u-paris10.fr/pdf/dt/2007/WP_EcoX_2007-23.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Paris West - Nanterre la Défense, EconomiX in its series EconomiX Working Papers with number 2007-23.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 34 pages
Date of creation: 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:drm:wpaper:2007-23

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 200 Avenue de la R�publique, B�t. K - 92001 Nanterre Cedex
Phone: 01 40 97 59 07
Fax: 01 40 97 70 57
Email:
Web page: http://economix.u-paris10.fr
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Bruno Chaves).

Related research
Keywords: Méta-analyse; méthode des prix hédoniques; évaluation environnementale; déchets;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Jill J. McCluskey & Gordon C. Rausser, 2003. "Stigmatized Asset Value: Is It Temporary or Long-Term?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 85(2), pages 276-285, 01. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Kohlhase, Janet E., 1991. "The impact of toxic waste sites on housing values," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-26, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Brasington, David M. & Hite, Diane, 2005. "Demand for environmental quality: a spatial hedonic analysis," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 57-82, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  4. V. Smith & Ju Huang, 1993. "Hedonic models and air pollution: Twenty-five years and counting," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 3(4), pages 381-394, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Jong Seok Lim & Paul Missios, 2007. "Does size really matter? Landfill scale impacts on property values," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 14(10), pages 719-723. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Richard T. Carson & Nicholas E. Flores & Kerry M. Martin & Jennifer L. Wright, 1996. "Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 72(1), pages 80-99. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Alan K. Reichert & Michael Small & Sunil Mohanty, 1992. "The Impact of Landfills on Residential Property Values," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 7(3), pages 297-314. [Downloadable!]
  8. V. Smith & Subhrendu Pattanayak, 2002. "Is Meta-Analysis a Noah's Ark for Non-Market Valuation?," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 22(1), pages 271-296, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Loomis, John B. & White, Douglas S., 1996. "Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 197-206, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Mark Thayer & Heidi Albers & Morteza Rahmatian, 1992. "The Benefits of Reducing Exposure to Waste Disposal Sites: A Hedonic Housing Value Approach," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 7(3), pages 265-282. [Downloadable!]
  11. Ihlanfeldt, Keith R. & Taylor, Laura O., 2004. "Externality effects of small-scale hazardous waste sites: evidence from urban commercial property markets," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 117-139, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  12. Jon P. Nelson, 2004. "Meta-Analysis of Airport Noise and Hedonic Property Values," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and University of Bath, vol. 38(1), pages 1-27, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  13. Cropper, Maureen L & Deck, Leland B & McConnell, Kenneth E, 1988. "On the Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Functions," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 70(4), pages 668-75, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  14. Richard T. Carson & Nicholas E. Flores & Kerry M. Martin & Jennifer L. Wright, 1994. "Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series 94-07, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? There are over 21000 authors registered on RePEc Author Service.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-23.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.