IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/diw/diwrup/86de.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Klimaverhandlungen: welche Erwartungen können an den Klimagipfel in Paris gestellt werden?

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp M. Richter
  • Hanna Brauers

Abstract

Kurz vor dem anstehenden Klimagipfel äußert sich Angela Merkel in der Frankfurter Allgemeinen Sonntagszeitung wie folgt: „Zu Recht wird von Regierungen und Politikern erwartet, dass sie nicht länger die Augen vor erdrückenden wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen verschließen, dass der Klimaschutz rasches und energisches Handeln erfordert.“ Frau Merkel stellt schließlich eine klare Forderung an die Ergebnisse des Klimagipfels: „Die Treibhausgasemissionen müssen nicht nur stabilisiert, sondern möglichst rasch vermindert werden.” Diese Aussagen sind heute noch aktuell, wurden jedoch tatsächlich am 26. März 1995 veröffentlicht; zu der Zeit also als Frau Merkel selbst noch das Amt der Bundesumweltministerin bekleidete und kurz darauf den ersten Klimagipfel als Präsidentin eröffnete. Nach mehr als 20 Jahren der Klimadiplomatie im Rahmen der Vereinten Nationen liegt die Aufmerksamkeit nun auf dem 21. Klimagipfel (COP, Conference of the Parties), der vom 30. November bis zum 11. Dezember in Paris stattfinden wird. Diesem Gipfel wird allgemeinhin zugeschrieben, die letzte Chance für eine rechtzeitige globale Einigung zur Vermeidung eines gefährlichen Klimawandels zu sein. In diesem DIW Roundup beleuchten wir die anstehende COP21 und diskutieren sowohl den aktuellen Stand als auch kontroverse Punkte der anstehenden Verhandlungen. Zudem zeigen wir Meilensteine bisheriger Klimagipfel und erläutern die ökonomische Theorie hinter internationalen Umweltabkommen.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp M. Richter & Hanna Brauers, 2015. "Klimaverhandlungen: welche Erwartungen können an den Klimagipfel in Paris gestellt werden?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 86, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwrup:86de
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.520818.de/DIW_Roundup_86_de.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rahel Aichele & Gabriel Felbermayr, 2013. "The Effect of the Kyoto Protocol on Carbon Emissions," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 731-757, September.
    2. Michael Grubb, 2015. "From Lima to Paris, Part 1: The Lima Hangover," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 299-301, May.
    3. Brian P. FLANNERY, 2015. "The state of climate negotiations," Working Papers P134, FERDI.
    4. Gernot Klepper & Franzjosef Schafhausen & Andreas Löschel & Miranda Schreurs, 2015. "Erwartungen an die Weltklimakonferenz in Paris," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 95(11), pages 727-743, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philipp M. Richter & Hanna Brauers, 2015. "Climate Negotiations: What Can Be Expected from the Climate Summit in Paris?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 86, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Rohan Best & Paul J. Burke, 2020. "Energy mix persistence and the effect of carbon pricing," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 555-574, July.
    3. Derek Glasgow & Shuang Zhao & Saatvika Rai, 2021. "Rethinking Climate Change Leadership: An Analysis of the Ambitiousness of State GHG Targets," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(4), pages 398-426, July.
    4. Hannah Ritchie & David S. Reay, 2017. "Delivering the two degree global climate change target using a flexible ratchet framework," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(8), pages 1031-1045, November.
    5. Adrian Amelung, 2016. "Das "Paris-Agreement": Durchbruch der Top-Down-Klimaschutzverhandlungen im Kreise der Vereinten Nationen," Otto-Wolff-Institut Discussion Paper Series 03/2016, Otto-Wolff-Institut für Wirtschaftsordnung, Köln, Deutschland.
    6. Antoine Mandel & Solmaria Halleck Vega & Dan-Xia Wang, 2020. "The contribution of technological diffusion to climate change mitigation: a network-based approach," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 609-620, June.
    7. Halleck-Vega, Solmaria & Mandel, Antoine & Millock, Katrin, 2018. "Accelerating diffusion of climate-friendly technologies: A network perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 235-245.
    8. Almer, Christian & Winkler, Ralph, 2017. "Analyzing the effectiveness of international environmental policies: The case of the Kyoto Protocol," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 125-151.
    9. Yajing Liu & Shuai Zhou & Ge Zhang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Driving Forces of Multi-Scale Emissions Based on Nighttime Light Data: A Case Study of the Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Tol, Richard S.J., 2017. "The structure of the climate debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 431-438.
    11. Pata, Ugur Korkut & Ertugrul, Hasan Murat, 2023. "Do the Kyoto Protocol, geopolitical risks, human capital and natural resources affect the sustainability limit? A new environmental approach based on the LCC hypothesis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Sylvain Weber & Reyer Gerlagh & Nicole A. Mathys & Daniel Moran, 2017. "CO2 embedded in trade: trends and fossil fuel drivers," Development Working Papers 413, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano.
    13. Dijkstra, Bouwe R. & Nentjes, Andries, 2020. "Pareto-Efficient Solutions for Shared Public Good Provision: Nash Bargaining versus Exchange-Matching-Lindahl," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    14. Richard S.J. Tol, 2018. "Energy and Climate," Working Paper Series 1618, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    15. Ruiqi Wang & Huanchen Tang & Xin Ma, 2022. "Can Carbon Emission Trading Policy Reduce PM2.5? Evidence from Hubei, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Geng Qin & Hanzhi Yu, 2023. "Rescuing the Paris Agreement: Improving the Global Experimentalist Governance by Reclassifying Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Rios, Vicente & Gianmoena, Lisa, 2018. "Convergence in CO2 emissions: A spatial economic analysis with cross-country interactions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 222-238.
    18. Brian P. FLANNERY, 2015. "The state of climate negotiations," Working Papers P134, FERDI.
    19. Chien-Ho Wang & Ming-Hui Ko & Wan-Jiun Chen, 2019. "Effects of Kyoto Protocol on CO 2 Emissions: A Five-Country Rolling Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwrup:86de. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.