Growing international financial integration has implied greater threat of contagion across borders, requiring quicker response to crises. However, financial—and trade—integration have been accompanied by the spread of democracy and political participation. Do more voices in the political process impede the need for speed required by financial markets? We find that the Fund’s operational approach, its governance structure, and domestic democratic processes have cooperated to facilitate faster response to financial crises. The time span from a crisis to the negotiation of an IMF program has been smaller the more serious the crisis. The response speed appears to have increased over time, with consideration to a broader range of vulnerabilities, especially to sudden stops in capital inflows. Affiliation to the United States has proved increasingly more valuable for the rapid conclusion of a program. And, democracies are sensitive to time pressures.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: