Tax credits have been a popular way to alleviate in-work poverty. The assumption is typicallythat the incidence is on the claimant workers. However, economic theory suggests noparticular reason to believe that this should be the case. This paper investigates the incidenceof the Working Families Tax Credit in the UK introduced in 1999, which unlike similar taxcredit policies was paid through the wage packet, increasing the connection between theemployer and worker with regard to the tax credit. Using two stage parametric and nonparametriccensored regression methods we find compelling evidence to suggest that (1) thefirm discriminates by cutting the wage of claimant workers relative to similarly skilled nonclaimantworkers when looking at men and (2) there is a spill-over effect onto the wage ofboth groups for both men and women.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Economic Performance, LSE in its series CEP Discussion Papers with number
dp0724.
Find related papers by JEL classification: J30 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - General H22 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Incidence I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs D58 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Don Fullerton & Gilbert E. Metcalf, 2002.
"Tax Incidence,"
NBER Working Papers
8829, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Fullerton, Don & Metcalf, Gilbert E., 2002.
"Tax incidence,"
Handbook of Public Economics,
in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 26, pages 1787-1872
Elsevier.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Richard Blundell & Hilary W. Hoynes, 2004.
"Has 'In-Work' Benefit Reform Helped the Labor Market?,"
NBER Chapters,
in: Seeking a Premier Economy: The Economic Effects of British Economic Reforms, 1980-2000, pages 411-460
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!]