IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2106.08421.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pricing and Risk Analysis in Hyperbolic Local Volatility Model with Quasi Monte Carlo

Author

Listed:
  • Julien Hok
  • Sergei Kucherenko

Abstract

Local volatility models usually capture the surface of implied volatilities more accurately than other approaches, such as stochastic volatility models. We present the results of application of Monte Carlo (MC) and Quasi Monte Carlo (QMC) methods for derivative pricing and risk analysis based on Hyperbolic Local Volatility Model. In high-dimensional integration QMC shows a superior performance over MC if the effective dimension of an integrand is not too large. In application to derivative pricing and computation of Greeks effective dimensions depend on path discretization algorithms. The results presented for the Asian option show the superior performance of the Quasi Monte Carlo methods especially for the Brownian Bridge discretization scheme.

Suggested Citation

  • Julien Hok & Sergei Kucherenko, 2021. "Pricing and Risk Analysis in Hyperbolic Local Volatility Model with Quasi Monte Carlo," Papers 2106.08421, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2106.08421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.08421
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sobol´ I.M. & Kucherenko S.S., 2005. "On global sensitivity analysis of quasi-Monte Carlo algorithms," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 83-92, March.
    2. Julien Hok & Shih-Hau Tan, 2019. "Calibration of local volatility model with stochastic interest rates by efficient numerical PDE methods," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 42(2), pages 609-637, December.
    3. Rubinstein, Mark, 1994. "Implied Binomial Trees," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(3), pages 771-818, July.
    4. Marco Bianchetti & Sergei Kucherenko & Stefano Scoleri, 2015. "Pricing and Risk Management with High-Dimensional Quasi Monte Carlo and Global Sensitivity Analysis," Papers 1504.02896, arXiv.org.
    5. Leif Andersen & Jesper Andreasen, 2000. "Volatility skews and extensions of the Libor market model," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-32.
    6. Mark Rubinstein., 1994. "Implied Binomial Trees," Research Program in Finance Working Papers RPF-232, University of California at Berkeley.
    7. Jacinto Marabel Romo, 2012. "The Quanto Adjustment and the Smile," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(9), pages 877-908, September.
    8. Emanuel Derman & Iraj Kani, 1998. "Stochastic Implied Trees: Arbitrage Pricing with Stochastic Term and Strike Structure of Volatility," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(01), pages 61-110.
    9. Fredrik Åkesson & John P. Lehoczky, 2000. "Path Generation for Quasi-Monte Carlo Simulation of Mortgage-Backed Securities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(9), pages 1171-1187, September.
    10. Пигнастый, Олег & Koжевников, Георгий, 2019. "Распределенная Динамическая Pde-Модель Программного Управления Загрузкой Технологического Оборудования Производственной Линии [Distributed dynamic PDE-model of a program control by utilization of t," MPRA Paper 93278, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 Feb 2019.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julien Hok & Philip Ngare & Antonis Papapantoleon, 2018. "Expansion formulas for European quanto options in a local volatility FX-LIBOR model," Papers 1801.01205, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2018.
    2. Julien Hok & Philip Ngare & Antonis Papapantoleon, 2018. "Expansion Formulas For European Quanto Options In A Local Volatility Fx-Libor Model," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(02), pages 1-43, March.
    3. Julien Hok & Shih-Hau Tan, 2019. "Calibration of local volatility model with stochastic interest rates by efficient numerical PDE methods," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 42(2), pages 609-637, December.
    4. Carol Alexandra & Leonardo M. Nogueira, 2005. "Optimal Hedging and Scale Inavriance: A Taxonomy of Option Pricing Models," ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance icma-dp2005-10, Henley Business School, University of Reading, revised Nov 2005.
    5. Andrea Pascucci & Marco Di Francesco, 2005. "On the complete model with stochastic volatility by Hobson and Rogers," Finance 0503013, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Wael Bahsoun & Pawel Góra & Silvia Mayoral & Manuel Morales, 2006. "Random Dynamics and Finance: Constructing Implied Binomial Trees from a Predetermined Stationary Den," Faculty Working Papers 13/06, School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Navarra.
    7. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    8. Chalamandaris, Georgios & Tsekrekos, Andrianos E., 2010. "Predictable dynamics in implied volatility surfaces from OTC currency options," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1175-1188, June.
    9. Carol Alexander & Leonardo Nogueira, 2007. "Model-free price hedge ratios for homogeneous claims on tradable assets," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(5), pages 473-479.
    10. David Heath & Eckhard Platen, 2006. "Local volatility function models under a benchmark approach," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 197-206.
    11. Peter Christoffersen & Kris Jacobs & Gregory Vainberg, 2007. "Forward-Looking Betas," CREATES Research Papers 2007-39, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    12. Silvia Muzzioli, 2010. "Towards a volatility index for the Italian stock market," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 10091, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    13. Y. Wang & H. Yin & L. Qi, 2004. "No-Arbitrage Interpolation of the Option Price Function and Its Reformulation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 627-649, March.
    14. Mathias Barkhagen & Jörgen Blomvall, 2016. "Modeling and evaluation of the option book hedging problem using stochastic programming," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 259-273, February.
    15. Bo-Young Chang & Peter Christoffersen & Kris Jacobs & Gregory Vainberg, 2011. "Option-Implied Measures of Equity Risk," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 16(2), pages 385-428.
    16. Liao, Wen Ju & Sung, Hao-Chang, 2020. "Implied risk aversion and pricing kernel in the FTSE 100 index," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    17. Feng Zhao & Robert Jarrow & Haitao Li, 2004. "Interest Rate Caps Smile Too! But Can the LIBOR Market Models Capture It?," Econometric Society 2004 North American Winter Meetings 431, Econometric Society.
    18. Silvia Muzzioli, 2013. "The Information Content of Option-Based Forecasts of Volatility: Evidence from the Italian Stock Market," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(01), pages 1-46.
    19. Carey, Alexander, 2008. "Natural volatility and option pricing," MPRA Paper 6709, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Nicole Bauerle & Daniel Schmithals, 2019. "Consistent upper price bounds for exotic options given a finite number of call prices and their convergence," Papers 1907.09144, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2106.08421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.