IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331294.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Brazil's Beef Production and Its Efficiency: A Comparative Study of Scale Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Somwaru, Agapi
  • Valdes, Constanza

Abstract

In recent years, Brazil –one of the world’s main suppliers of agricultural products- has been raising beef productivity and exports. In Brazil, large farm land availability, ample feedstuffs supplies, a large domestic consumer market, and liberalization of trade barriers have allowed large firms to achieve economies of size that have made the country a major, growing source of meat production. Major differences exist between the modern and the traditional segments of the beef-cattle sub-sector. To assess competitive strength of Brazil's livestock operations, we estimate non-parametrically the efficiency and scale elasticity of 450 cattle operations. Our hypothesis is that large-size specialized farms exhibit cost economies and higher efficiency levels than other beef production operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Somwaru, Agapi & Valdes, Constanza, 2004. "Brazil's Beef Production and Its Efficiency: A Comparative Study of Scale Economies," Conference papers 331294, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331294/files/1770.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lence, Sergio H & Miller, Douglas J, 1998. "Estimation of Multi-output Production Functions with Incomplete Data: A Generalised Maximum Entropy Approach," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 25(2), pages 188-209.
    2. Diewert, Walter E & Wales, Terence J, 1987. "Flexible Functional Forms and Global Curvature Conditions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 43-68, January.
    3. Golan, Amos & Judge, George G. & Miller, Douglas, 1996. "Maximum Entropy Econometrics," Staff General Research Papers Archive 1488, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Richard E. Just & David Zilberman & Eithan Hochman & Ziv Bar-Shira, 1990. "Input Allocation in Multicrop Systems," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(1), pages 200-209.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mueller, Marc, 2004. "Where Has All The Water Gone? Estimation Of A Production Function For The Agricultural Sector In The Region Khorezm, Uzbekistan," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20106, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Louhichi, Kamel & Jacquet, Florence & Butault, Jean Pierre, 2012. "Estimating input allocation from heterogeneous data sources: A comparison of alternative estimation approaches," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20.
    3. Msangi, Siwa & Howitt, Richard E., 2006. "Estimating Disaggregate Production Functions: An Application to Northern Mexico," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21080, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. You, Liangzhi & Wood, Stanley & Wood-Sichra, Ulrike, 2004. "Generating Plausible Crop Distribution Maps For Sub-Sahara Africa Using Spatial Allocation Model," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19965, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Arndt, Channing & Benfica, Rui & Tarp, Finn & Thurlow, James & Uaiene, Rafael, 2010. "Biofuels, poverty, and growth: a computable general equilibrium analysis of Mozambique," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 81-105, February.
    6. LaFrance, Jeffrey T., 1999. "An Econometric Model of the Demand for Food and Nutrition," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt2z5516c2, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    7. Raja Chakir, 2009. "Spatial Downscaling of Agricultural Land-Use Data: An Econometric Approach Using Cross Entropy," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 85(2), pages 238-251.
    8. Bouamra-Mechemache, Zohra & Ali-Kein, Hela Hadj & Jongeneel, Roelof A. & Tonini, Axel & Requillart, Vincent, 2005. "EU Dairy Sector: Impact of Luxemburg Reform, EU Enlargement and Trade Negotiations," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24581, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Letort, Elodie & Carpentier, Alain, 2009. "Endogeneity of acreage choices in input allocation equations: implied problems and a solution," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49217, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Arfini, Filippo & Donati, Michele & Marongiu, Sonia & Cesaro, Luca, 2012. "Farm production costs estimation trough PMP Models: an application in three Italian Regions," 2012 First Congress, June 4-5, 2012, Trento, Italy 124117, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    11. António Xavier & Rui Fragoso & Maria De Belém Costa Freitas & Maria Do Socorro Rosário & Florentino Valente, 2018. "A Minimum Cross-Entropy Approach to Disaggregate Agricultural Data at the Field Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, May.
    12. Steven Sexton & David Zilberman, 2011. "Land for Food and Fuel Production: The Role of Agricultural Biotechnology," NBER Chapters, in: The Intended and Unintended Effects of US Agricultural and Biotechnology Policies, pages 269-288, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Steven Sexton & David Zilberman, 2011. "How Agricultural Biotechnology Boosts Food Supply and Accomodates Biofuels," NBER Working Papers 16699, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Hansen, H. & Surry, Y., 2007. "Die Schätzung verfahrensspezifischer Faktoreneinsatzmengen für die Landwirtschaft in Deutschland," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 42, March.
    15. Maximilian Koppenberg, 2023. "Markups, organic agriculture and downstream concentration at the example of European dairy farmers," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(2), pages 161-178, March.
    16. Arfini, Filippo & Donati, Michele & Grossi, L. & Paris, Quirino, 2008. "Revenue and Cost Functions in PMP: a Methodological Integration for a Territorial Analysis of CAP," 107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain 6636, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Arfini, Filippo & Donati, Michele & Paris, Quirino, 2008. "Innovation in Estimation of Revenue and Cost Functions in PMP Using FADN Information at Regional Level," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44008, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Anderson, Weston & You, Liangzhi & Wood, Stanley & Wood-Sichra, Ulrike & Wu, Wenbin, 2014. "A comparative analysis of global cropping systems models and maps:," IFPRI discussion papers 1327, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. Heckelei, T. & Wolff, H., 2001. "Ansätze zur (Auf-)Lösung eines alten Methodenstreits: Ökonometrische Spezifikation von Programmierungsmodellen zur Agrarangebotsanalyse," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 37.
    20. Alfons Oude Lansink, 2001. "Long and Short Term Economies of Scope in Dutch Vegetable Production," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 123-138, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.