Mitigation and Heterogeneity in Management Practices on New Zealand Dairy Farms
AbstractWe consider two approaches to quantify New Zealand farmers’ ability to mitigate their farm’s environmental impact: The construction of marginal abatement cost curves and improvements in farm management practices. Marginal abatement cost curves can be constructed by combining information on the effectiveness of mitigation with cost data. However, we find that the available data is not sufficient to support this approach. We consider improvements in management practices using a distribution of farm production efficiency with regard to nitrogen and greenhouse gas (kg production per unit of emissions). Where differences in production efficiency are due to factors that can be managed by farmers, targeting less efficient farmers to encourage the adoption of management practices similar to those of the more efficient farmers is a potential mitigation strategy.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society in its series 2012 Conference, August 31, 2012, Nelson, New Zealand with number 136039.
Date of creation: Aug 2012
Date of revision:
Cost curves; greenhouse gas; heterogeneity; leaching; mitigation; nitrogen; production efficiency; Agribusiness; Environmental Economics and Policy; Farm Management; Land Economics/Use; Production Economics; Q53; Q57;
Other versions of this item:
- Simon Anastasiadis & Suzi Kerr, 2013. "Mitigation and Heterogeneity in Management Practices on New Zealand Dairy Farms," Working Papers 13_11, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
- Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
- Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-AGR-2012-11-24 (Agricultural Economics)
- NEP-ALL-2012-11-24 (All new papers)
- NEP-EFF-2012-11-24 (Efficiency & Productivity)
- NEP-ENV-2012-11-24 (Environmental Economics)
- NEP-RES-2012-11-24 (Resource Economics)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Ridler, B.J. & Anderson, W.J. & Fraser, P., 2010. "Milk, money, muck and metrics: inefficient resource allocation by New Zealand dairy farmers," 2010 Conference, August 26-27, 2010, Nelson, New Zealand 96492, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
- Graeme J. Doole, 2010. "Evaluating Input Standards for Non-Point Pollution Control under Firm Heterogeneity," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 680-696.
- Doole, Graeme J. & Pannell, David J., 2009. "Nonpoint pollution policy evaluation under ambiguity," 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia 48036, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
- Anna Strutt & Allan N. Rae, 2011. "Modelling the Impact of Policies to Reduce Environmental Impacts in the New Zealand Dairy Sector," Working Papers in Economics 11/04, University of Waikato, Department of Economics.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.