IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cudarb/122636.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Vegetable Consumption, Dietary Guidelines and Agricultural Production in New York State—Implications for Local Food Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Peters, Christian
  • Bills, Nelson L.
  • Wilkins, Jennifer
  • Smith, R. David

Abstract

ocal food economies where local producers respond to regional consumers’ needs are gaining attention as a means for boosting agriculture and food production in New York State. Concurrent with this interest in local agriculture is a national concern over the health effects of American food consumption patterns and the capacity of agriculture to support nutritious diets. This study merges these areas of inquiry in the context of a nutritionally and economically important agricultural sector, namely New York State vegetable production. Three questions are examined in this research. 1) How does New York State vegetable production compare with the vegetable consumption by New Yorkers? 2) How do production and consumption of vegetables compare with the recommendations in the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Guide Pyramid? 3) What implications do these comparisons have for New York State agriculture? These questions were addressed using existing national and state data to estimate vegetable production and vegetable consumption in New York State. Then, in-state agricultural production and food consumption were compared with the Food Pyramid recommendations. Annual per capita consumption estimates for the Northeast suggest that New Yorkers consume approximately 160 pounds of vegetables per person per year. Based on population estimates, this level of per capita consumption indicates that New Yorkers consumed 2.9 billion pounds of vegetables in calendar year 1999. In contrast, New York State agriculture harvested an average of 3.3 billion pounds of vegetables annually during 1994-1998. After adjusting for post-harvest losses and inedible portions, the consumable equivalent of this farmgate production is 1.6 billion pounds. Based on a crop by crop comparison, New York produces a handful of vegetable crops (e.g., beets, cabbage, onions, pumpkins, snap beans, and sweet corn) in quantities that exceed the estimated in-state demand. As a result, New York produces enough vegetables to provide 38 percent of the total vegetable consumption plus 500 million pounds of “surplus” of the aforementioned crops. Comparisons with the Food Guide Pyramid demonstrate that both vegetable consumption and production in New York State mirror national trends, featuring lesser amounts of nutritionally important vegetable groups. Consumption of the “dark green leafy & deep yellow vegetables” and the “dry legumes” are only 41 percent and 19 percent, respectively, of the recommended amounts. Though New York State harvests enough dry edible beans to match the current level of consumption, it is well below the recommended amount. Furthermore, New York is a minor producer of the dark green leafy and deep yellow vegetables, producing only 12 percent of the recommended number of servings. This research could have favorable implications for New York State vegetable growers and consumers. Agricultural census data suggests that New York’s vegetable sector has historically been robust. It has maintained a consistent quantity of land in vegetable production for the last 50 years, despite shifts in crops, and has proven to be adaptable. Though New York State is among the nation’s top six vegetable producing states, this research suggests that the local market is still large relative to state output. Though more geographically specific information would be helpful for growers to put this information into practice, it is clear that much potential exists for some growers to target local and regional markets and nutritionally conscious consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Peters, Christian & Bills, Nelson L. & Wilkins, Jennifer & Smith, R. David, 2002. "Vegetable Consumption, Dietary Guidelines and Agricultural Production in New York State—Implications for Local Food Economies," Research Bulletins 122636, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122636
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.122636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/122636/files/Cornell_Dyson_rb0207.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.122636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Young, C. Edwin & Kantor, Linda Scott, 1999. "Moving Toward the Food Guide Pyramid: Implications for U.S. Agriculture," Agricultural Economic Reports 34071, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Bowman, Shanthy A. & Lino, Mark & Gerrior, Shirley A. & Basiotis, Peter P., 1998. "The Healthy Eating Index: 1994-96," CNPP Reports 257277, United States Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.
    3. Stanton, Bernard F. & Bills, Nelson L., 1996. "The Return of Agricultural Lands to Forest: Changing Land Use in the Twentieth Century," EB Series 186333, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    4. Putnam, Judy & Kantor, Linda Scott & Allshouse, Jane, 2000. "Per Capita Food Supply Trends: Progress Toward Dietary Guidelines," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 23(3), September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Atallah, Shady S. & Gómez, Miguel I. & Björkman, Thomas, 2014. "Localization effects for a fresh vegetable product supply chain: Broccoli in the eastern United States," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 151-159.
    2. Derek H. Lynch & Rod MacRae & Ralph C. Martin, 2011. "The Carbon and Global Warming Potential Impacts of Organic Farming: Does It Have a Significant Role in an Energy Constrained World?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-41, January.
    3. Ellen Desjardins & Rod MacRae & Theresa Schumilas, 2010. "Linking future population food requirements for health with local production in Waterloo Region, Canada," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(2), pages 129-140, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rickard, Bradley J. & Gonsalves, Jana, 2006. "Examining Potential Changes in Nutrition: Recommendations and Implications for Specialty Crops in California," Research Project Reports 121617, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California Institute for the Study of Specialty Crops.
    2. repec:mpr:mprres:2472 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Alston, Julian M. & Mullally, Conner C. & Sumner, Daniel A. & Townsend, Marilyn & Vosti, Stephen A., 2009. "Likely effects on obesity from proposed changes to the US food stamp program," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 176-184, April.
    4. Rickard, Bradley J. & Gonsalves, Jana L., 2008. "How would compliance with dietary recommendations affect revenues for agricultural producers?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 422-433, October.
    5. Nordström, Jonas & Thunström, Linda, 2009. "The impact of tax reforms designed to encourage healthier grain consumption," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 622-634, May.
    6. Christine Moorman & Rosellina Ferraro & Joel Huber, 2012. "Unintended Nutrition Consequences: Firm Responses to the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(5), pages 717-737, September.
    7. Philip M. Gleason & Anu Rangarajan & Christine Olson, "undated". "Dietary Intake and Dietary Attitudes Among Food Stamp Participants and Other Low-Income Individuals," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 7de7096e094445cba404d4e97, Mathematica Policy Research.
    8. Joyce, Lucy T. & Bills, Nelson L., 1996. "Agricultural and Farmland Protection Planning: A Case Study in Orange County, New York," Staff Papers 121188, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    9. Gerrior, Shirley & Bente, Lisa, 2001. "Food Supply Nutrients and Dietary Guidance, 1970-99," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 24(3), pages 1-8.
    10. repec:mpr:mprres:2443 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Kramer-LeBlanc, Carol S. & Mardis, Anne & Gerrior, Shirley & Gaston, Nancy, 1999. "Review of the Nutritional Status of WIC Participants: Final Report," CNPP Reports 311251, United States Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.
    12. Grainger, Corbett & Senauer, Benjamin & Runge, C. Ford, 2005. "Analyzing Health Innovations in a School Lunch Program," Working Papers 14393, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    13. Seth S. Martin, 2005. "From Poverty to Obesity: Exploration of the Food Choice Constraint Model and the Impact of an Energy-Dense Food Tax," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 49(2), pages 78-86, October.
    14. Duffy, Patricia A. & Zizza, Claire A. & Zhu, Min & Kinnucan, Henry W. & Tayie, Francis A., 2008. "Food Insecurity, Diet Quality, and Body Weight: Inter-Relationships and the Effect of Smoking and Alcohol Consumption," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6155, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Philip Gleason & Carol Suitor, "undated". "Children's Diets in the Mid-1990s: Dietary Intake and Its Relationship with School Meal Participation," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 8db693ba4d8640ec87d978a34, Mathematica Policy Research.
    16. Ellen Desjardins & Rod MacRae & Theresa Schumilas, 2010. "Linking future population food requirements for health with local production in Waterloo Region, Canada," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(2), pages 129-140, June.
    17. Philip Gleason & Carol Suitor, "undated". "Changes in Children's Diets: 1989-1991 to 1994-1996," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 58765ecbba164e49b7d7069bc, Mathematica Policy Research.
    18. Variyam, Jayachandran, 2003. "Factors Affecting the Macronutrient Intake of U.S. Adults," Technical Bulletins 184322, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. repec:mpr:mprres:2567 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Zach Conrad & Christian J. Peters & Kenneth Chui & Lisa Jahns & Timothy S. Griffin, 2017. "Agricultural Capacity to Increase the Production of Select Fruits and Vegetables in the US: A Geospatial Modeling Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, September.
    21. Kara A. Kuntz & Frederic Beaudry & Karen L. Porter, 2018. "Farmers’ Perceptions of Agricultural Land Abandonment in Rural Western New York State," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dacorus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.