IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/hbsedi/204.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Sektorale Innovationsprozesse und die Diskussion über deutsche Innovationsschwächen

Author

Listed:
  • Jürgens, Ulrich
  • Sablowski, Thomas

Abstract

In der "Standortdebatte" werden Deutschland oft pauschal Innovationsschwächen zugeschrieben. In der Diskussion über Spielarten des Kapitalismus wird die Auffassung vertreten, "liberale Marktwirtschaften" wie die USA begünstigten eher radikale Innovationen als "koordinierte Marktwirtschaften" wie Deutschland. Eine genauere Analyse sektoraler Innovationsprozesse in der Pharmaindustrie, der Telekommunikationsindustrie und der Automobilindustrie zeigt allerdings, dass die Wirklichkeit komplizierter ist: Die Gegenüberstellung von "radikalen" und "inkrementellen" Innovationen ist ebenso problematisch wie ihre Identifizierung mit bestimmten Branchen und Institutionensystemen. Nationale Innovationssysteme sind keine abgeschlossenen Einheiten, sondern bedingen sich in ihren Stärken und Schwächen gegenseitig. Staatliche Regulierung spielt überall eine zentrale Rolle für Innovationsprozesse, wenn auch in unterschiedlicher Weise. Eine historische Analyse ist unabdingbar, um Veränderungen der Innovationsbedingungen zu begreifen. In der deutschen Pharma-industrie und Telekommunikationsindustrie ist ein relativer Niedergang zu verzeichnen, der jedoch sehr unterschiedliche Gründe hat, die sich nicht unter ein einfaches Erklärungsschema subsumieren lassen. Die deutsche Innovationsdebatte ist noch zu sehr auf Technologieförderung fixiert und blendet Fragen der sozialen und ökologischen Qualität von Innovationen und ihrer Diffusion weitgehend aus.

Suggested Citation

  • Jürgens, Ulrich & Sablowski, Thomas, 2008. "Sektorale Innovationsprozesse und die Diskussion über deutsche Innovationsschwächen," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 204.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/181686/1/p_edition_hbs_204.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akira Takeishi, Takahiro Fujimoto, 2001. "Modularisation in the auto industry: interlinked multiple hierarchies of product, production and supplier systems," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 379-396.
    2. Marie Carpenter & William Lazonick & Mary O’ Sullivan, 2003. "The stock market and innovative capability in the New Economy : the optical networking industry," Post-Print hal-02447314, HAL.
    3. Akira Takeishi & Takahiro Fujimoto, 2001. "Modularization in the Auto Industry: Interlinked Multiple Hierarchies of Product, Production, and Supplier Systems," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-107, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    4. Jeffrey L. Funk, 2002. "Global Competition Between and Within Standards," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-28886-7.
    5. Orsenigo, L. & Pammolli, F. & Riccaboni, Massimo, 2001. "Technological change and network dynamics: Lessons from the pharmaceutical industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 485-508, March.
    6. Takeishi, Akira & 武石, 彰 & Fujimoto, Takahiro & 藤本, 隆宏, 2001. "Modularization in the Auto Industry: Interlinked Multiple Hierarchies of Product, Production, and Supplier Systems," IIR Working Paper 01-02, Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    7. Amable, Bruno, 2003. "The Diversity of Modern Capitalism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199261147.
    8. Canzler, Weert & Knie, Andreas, 1994. "Das Ende des Automobils: Fakten und Trends zum Umbau der Autogesellschaft," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 112234.
    9. Arora, Ashish & Gambardella, Alfonso, 1994. "The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 523-532, September.
    10. Marie Carpenter & William Lazonick & Mary O'Sullivan, 2003. "The stock market and innovative capability in the New Economy: the optical networking industry," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 12(5), pages 963-1034, October.
    11. Feng, Hengyi & Froud,Julie & Johal, Sukhdev & Haslam, Colin & Williams, Karel, 2001. "A new business model?," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Regulation of Work FS II 01-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    12. Rosenberg, Nathan & Nelson, Richard R., 1994. "American universities and technical advance in industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 323-348, May.
    13. Henrik Glimstedt, 2001. "Competitive Dynamics Of Technological Standardization: The Case Of Third Generation Cellular Communications," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 49-78.
    14. Vitols, Sigurt, 2004. "Changes in Germany's bank-based financial system: A varieties of capitalism perspective," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions, States, Markets SP II 2004-03, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    15. Taylor, Mark Zachary, 2004. "Empirical Evidence Against Varieties of Capitalism's Theory of Technological Innovation," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(3), pages 601-631, July.
    16. Matraves, Catherine, 1999. "Market Structure, R&D and Advertising in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 169-194, June.
    17. Funk, Jeffrey L. & Methe, David T., 2001. "Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: the case of mobile communication," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 589-610, April.
    18. Oecd, 2004. "Patents and Innovation: Trends and Policy Challenges," Levine's Working Paper Archive 122247000000000502, David K. Levine.
    19. Stephane Jacobzone, 2000. "Pharmaceutical Policies in OECD Countries: Reconciling Social and Industrial Goals," OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers 40, OECD Publishing.
    20. Jean-Jacques Chanaron, 2001. "Implementing technological and organisational innovations and management of core competencies: lessons from the automotive industry," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 128-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Brusoni & Lorenzo Cassi & Simge Tuna, 2021. "Knowledge integration between technical change and strategy making," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 1521-1552, November.
    2. Jürgens, Ulrich, 2003. "Characteristics of the European automotive system: Is there a distinctive European approach?," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Knowledge, Production Systems and Work SP III 2003-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Michael Murphree & Dan Breznitz, 2018. "Indigenous digital technology standards for development: The case of China," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(3), pages 234-252, December.
    4. Lazonick William, 2008. "Comment on "Technological Revolutions and the Evolution of Industrial Structures" (by Giovanni Dosi, Alfonso Gambardella, Marco Grazzi, and Luigi Orsenigo)," Capitalism and Society, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, June.
    5. William Lazonick, 2018. "Comments on Gary Pisano: “toward a prescriptive theory of dynamic capabilities”," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(6), pages 1165-1174.
    6. Stefano Brusoni & Paola Criscuolo & Aldo Geuna, 2005. "The knowledge bases of the world's largest pharmaceutical groups: what do patent citations to non-patent literature reveal?," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 395-415.
    7. Gianluca Baio & Laura Magazzini & Antonio Nicita & Fabio Pammolli & Massimo Riccaboni, 2003. "Il Decreto DL 15/04/2002, n. 63 sul Contenimento della Spesa Farmaceutica - Impatto sull'Industria e Distorsioni nel Funzionamento del Mercato," Working Papers CERM 0-2003, Competitività, Regole, Mercati (CERM).
    8. Lee Branstetter & Kwon Hyeog Ug, 2004. "The Restructuring Of Japanese Research And Development: The Increasing Impact Of Science On Japanese R&D," Discussion papers 04021, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    9. Ahlquist, John S. & Breunig, Christian, 2009. "Country clustering in comparative political economy," MPIfG Discussion Paper 09/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    10. Lionel Nesta & Vincent Mangematin, 2002. "Industry Life Cycle, Knowledge Generation and Technological Networks," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03398092, HAL.
    11. Lobo, José & Strumsky, Deborah, 2008. "Metropolitan patenting, inventor agglomeration and social networks: A tale of two effects," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 871-884, May.
    12. Buchen, Clemens, 2010. "Emerging economic systems in Central and Eastern Europe – a qualitative and quantitative assessment," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 37141, July.
    13. Tobias Kretschmer & Katrin Muehlfeld, 2004. "Co-opetition in Standard-Setting: The Case of the Compact Disc," Working Papers 04-14, NET Institute, revised Oct 2004.
    14. Gordon Redding & Michael Witt, 2009. "China’s business system and its future trajectory," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 381-399, September.
    15. Luo, Jianxi & Triulzi, Giorgio, 2018. "Cyclic dependence, vertical integration, and innovation: The case of Japanese electronics sector in the 1990s," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 46-55.
    16. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2015. "Tangible resources and the development of organizational capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 54-68.
    17. Marie CARPENTER & Nabyla DAIDJ & Christina MORENO, 2014. "Game Console Manufacturers: the End of Sustainable Competitive Advantage?," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(94), pages 39-60, 2nd quart.
    18. William Lazonick, 2010. "Entrepreneurial Ventures and the Developmental State: Lessons from the Advanced Economies," Working Papers id:3167, eSocialSciences.
    19. Arora, Ashish & Athreye, Suma & Huang, Can, 2016. "The paradox of openness revisited: Collaborative innovation and patenting by UK innovators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1352-1361.
    20. Bettencourt, Luis M.A. & Lobo, Jose & Strumsky, Deborah, 2007. "Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 107-120, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boeckde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.