This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
A disaggregated empirical analysis of the determinants of IMF arrangements: Does one model fit all? Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Graham Bird (Surrey Centre for International Economic Studies, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK)
Dane Rowlands (Norman Paterson School of International Affairs, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada)
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
Does one model fit all when it comes to the determinants of IMF programs? Certainly claims have been made by the IMF that capital account crisis (CAC) countries are discernibly different in terms of the characteristics that lead them to borrow from it, while other research has claimed that it is only Asian economies that are different from the rest. This paper sets out to examine these issues. It tests various forms of a fairly conventional model to see whether some forms better fit certain groups of countries than others. It then uses the favoured models to estimate the probability of countries having an IMF arrangement. In particular it examines countries that have been identified by the Fund as CAC countries, but it also looks at a number of comparator countries. The findings suggest that there are some differences between low income and middle income countries. Pressures in the foreign exchange market are significant for the latter but not for the former. The paper also discusses differences between regions and within regions. Broadly speaking the findings confirm that Asian economies around the time of the 1997|1998 crisis tended to turn to the IMF for financial support more quickly than would have been anticipated on the basis of the existing best-fitting models. The paper also discusses the implications of the findings for policy and for the reform of the IMF. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Article provided by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. in its journal Journal of International Development .
Volume (Year): 21 (2009)
Issue (Month): 7 ()
Pages: 915-931
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:21:y:2009:i:7:p:915-931Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords:
Access and
download statistics Did you know? Cannot find something on IDEAS? Encourage the publisher to index it! Instructions .
This page was last updated on 2009-12-30.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .