IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v26y2017i4p528-535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bleeding Hearts, Profiteers, or Both: Specialist Physician Fees in an Unregulated Market

Author

Listed:
  • Meliyanni Johar
  • Chunzhou Mu
  • Kees Van Gool
  • Chun Yee Wong

Abstract

This study shows that, in an unregulated fee‐setting environment, specialist physicians practise price discrimination on the basis of their patients' income status. Our results are consistent with profit maximisation behaviour by specialists. These findings are based on a large population survey that is linked to administrative medical claims records. We find that, for an initial consultation, specialist physicians charge their high‐income patients AU$26 more than their low‐income patients. While this gap equates to a 19% lower fees for the poorest patients (bottom 25% of the household income distribution), it is unlikely to remove the substantial financial barriers they face in accessing specialist care. There are large variations across specialties, with neurologists exhibiting the largest fee gap between the high‐income and low‐income patients. Several possible channels for deducing the patient's income are examined. We find that patient characteristics such as age, health concession card status and private health insurance status are all used by specialists as proxies for income status. These characteristics are particularly important to further practise price discrimination among the low‐income patients but are less relevant for the high‐income patients. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Meliyanni Johar & Chunzhou Mu & Kees Van Gool & Chun Yee Wong, 2017. "Bleeding Hearts, Profiteers, or Both: Specialist Physician Fees in an Unregulated Market," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 528-535, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:26:y:2017:i:4:p:528-535
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.3317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3317
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.3317?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meliyanni Johar & Glenn Jones & Elizabeth Savage, 2012. "Healthcare Expenditure Profile of Older Australians: Evidence from Linked Survey and Health Administrative Data," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 31(4), pages 451-463, December.
    2. Johar, Meliyanni, 2012. "Do doctors charge high income patients more?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 596-599.
    3. Astrid Kiil & Kurt Houlberg, 2014. "How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(8), pages 813-828, November.
    4. Van Doorslaer, Eddy & Clarke, Philip & Savage, Elizabeth & Hall, Jane, 2008. "Horizontal inequities in Australia's mixed public/private health care system," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 97-108, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Craike, Melinda & Wiesner, Glen & Enticott, Joanne & Bennie, Jason A. & Biddle, Stuart J.H., 2018. "Equity of a government subsidised exercise referral scheme: A population study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 20-25.
    2. Naghsh Nejad, Maryam & Yu, Serena & Haywood, Philip, 2023. "Provider Responses to the Expansion of Public Subsidies in Healthcare: The Case of Oral Chemotherapy Treatment in Australia," IZA Discussion Papers 16060, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Yu, Serena & van Gool, Kees & Hall, Jane & Fiebig, Denzil G., 2019. "Physician pricing behavior: Evidence from an Australian experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 20-34.
    4. Pulok, Mohammad Habibullah & van Gool, Kees & Hall, Jane, 2020. "Inequity in physician visits: the case of the unregulated fee market in Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    5. Pulok, Mohammad Habibullah & van Gool, Kees & Hall, Jane, 2020. "Horizontal inequity in the utilisation of healthcare services in Australia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(11), pages 1263-1271.
    6. Callander, Emily J. & Shand, Antonia & Nassar, Natasha, 2021. "Inequality in out of pocket fees, government funding and utilisation of maternal health services in Australia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(6), pages 701-708.
    7. Denzil G. Fiebig & Kees van Gool & Jane Hall & Chunzhou Mu, 2021. "Health care use in response to health shocks: Does socio‐economic status matter?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(12), pages 3032-3050, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denzil G. Fiebig & Kees van Gool & Jane Hall & Chunzhou Mu, 2021. "Health care use in response to health shocks: Does socio‐economic status matter?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(12), pages 3032-3050, December.
    2. Pulok, Mohammad Habibullah & van Gool, Kees & Hall, Jane, 2020. "Inequity in physician visits: the case of the unregulated fee market in Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Meliyanni Johar & Glenn Jones & Elizabeth Savage, 2014. "What Explains The Quality And Price Of Gp Services? An Investigation Using Linked Survey And Administrative Data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(9), pages 1115-1133, September.
    4. Connolly, Sheelah & Wren, Maev-Ann, 2023. "Towards universal healthcare in Ireland – what can we learn from the literature?," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number SUSTAT121, June.
    5. Hua, Xinyang & Erreygers, Guido & Chalmers, John & Laba, Tracey-Lea & Clarke, Philip, 2017. "Using administrative data to look at changes in the level and distribution of out-of-pocket medical expenditure: An example using Medicare data from Australia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(4), pages 426-433.
    6. Kevin Devereux & Mona Balesh Abadi & Farah Omran, 2019. "Correcting for Transitory Effects in RCTs: Application to the RAND Health Insurance Experiment," Working Papers 201910, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    7. Tavares, Lara Patrício & Zantomio, Francesca, 2017. "Inequity in healthcare use among older people after 2008: The case of southern European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(10), pages 1063-1071.
    8. Camilla Beck Olsen & Hans Olav Melberg, 2018. "Did adolescents in Norway respond to the elimination of copayments for general practitioner services?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(7), pages 1120-1130, July.
    9. Pulok, Mohammad Habibullah & van Gool, Kees & Hall, Jane, 2020. "Horizontal inequity in the utilisation of healthcare services in Australia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(11), pages 1263-1271.
    10. Azharuddin Akhtar & Indrani Roy Chowdhury, 2023. "The socioeconomic inequity in healthcare utilization among individuals with cardiovascular diseases in India," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 1000-1018, May.
    11. Landsem, Mari Magnussen & Magnussen, Jon, 2018. "The effect of copayments on the utilization of the GP service in Norway," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 99-106.
    12. Pilar García-Gómez & Toni Mora & Jaume Puig-Junoy, 2018. "Does €1 Per Prescription Make a Difference? Impact of a Capped Low-Intensity Pharmaceutical Co-Payment," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 407-414, June.
    13. Ponzo, Michela & Scoppa, Vincenzo, 2021. "Does demand for health services depend on cost-sharing? Evidence from Italy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    14. Chang Hoon You & Ji Heon Choi & Sungwook Kang & Eun-Hwan Oh & Young Dae Kwon, 2018. "Association between supplementary private health insurance and visits to physician offices versus hospital outpatient departments among adults with diabetes in the universal public insurance system," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, April.
    15. Montmartin, Benjamin & Herrera-Gómez, Marcos, 2023. "Spatial dependence in physicians’ prices and additional fees: Evidence from France," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    16. Mamas Theodorou, 2014. "Testing the Waters for GeSY: Patients’ Opinion of Cost-sharing Arrangements in the Public Health Care System in Cyprus," Cyprus Economic Policy Review, University of Cyprus, Economics Research Centre, vol. 8(2), pages 37-59, December.
    17. Berger, Michael & Six, Eva & Czypionka, Thomas, 2024. "Policy implications of heterogeneous demand reactions to changes in cost-sharing: patient-level evidence from Austria," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121162, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Rättö, Hanna & Kurko, Terhi & Martikainen, Jaana E. & Aaltonen, Katri, 2021. "The impact of a co-payment increase on the consumption of type 2 antidiabetics – A nationwide interrupted time series analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(9), pages 1166-1172.
    19. Lopes, Francisca Vargas & Riumallo Herl, Carlos J. & Mackenbach, Johan P. & Van Ourti, Tom, 2022. "Patient cost-sharing, mental health care and inequalities: A population-based natural experiment at the transition to adulthood," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:26:y:2017:i:4:p:528-535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.