IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v12y2021i4p2-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The corporate governance quality and market capitalization of Russian companies: An empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Irina I. Smotritskaya

    (Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia)

  • Nadezhda D. Frolova

    (Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

Market capitalization is one of the main criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of management in publicly traded corporations. In the aggregate of factors affecting the market value, the quality of corporate governance is of special importance. The article assesses the impact of the corporate governance quality on the market capitalization of Russian companies. Agency theory, institutional theory and the concept of corporate governance constitute the methodological basis of the research. The research methods include econometric modeling, which allowed identifying 12 composite factors that characterize the quality of corporate governance, and assessing the impact of individual elements of the corporate governance institute on market capitalization. The study sample includes 75 companies whose shares are traded on the Moscow Stock Exchange; the research timeframe is from 2011 to 2017. The results statistically prove that the factors characterizing the quality of the dividend policy and the corporate social responsibility policy have a significant effect on market capitalization indicators. No significant influence of factors characterizing the quality of information disclosure has been established. We have also rejected the assumption that the performance of administration and control bodies exerted a positive effect on market capitalization of Russian companies. The research findings may be of interest to researchers investigating the institute of corporate governance, as well as to representatives of large companies’ shareholders, and public authorities interested in a comprehensive assessment of the quality of corporate governance to improve the existing institutional environment and the practice of state regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina I. Smotritskaya & Nadezhda D. Frolova, 2021. "The corporate governance quality and market capitalization of Russian companies: An empirical analysis," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 2-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:2-15
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-4-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/92/1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/ru/-2021/836
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-4-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrey B. Ankudinov & Bela S. Bataeva, 2021. "Capital structure and market capitalization: Empirical analysis of Russian public companies," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 35-42, April.
    2. Stefan Cristian Gherghina, 2015. "Corporate Governance Ratings and Firm Value: Empirical Evidence from the Bucharest Stock Exchange," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 5(1), pages 97-110.
    3. Bertrand P. Quéré & Geneviève Nouyrigat & C. Richard Baker, 2018. "Erratum to: A Bi-Directional Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Ratings and Company Financial Performance in the European Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 545-547, March.
    4. Bertrand P. Quéré & Geneviève Nouyrigat & C. Richard Baker, 2018. "A Bi-Directional Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Ratings and Company Financial Performance in the European Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 527-544, March.
    5. Bertrand Quere & Geneviève Nouyrigat & C. Richard Baker, 2018. "A Bi-Directional Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Ratings and Company Financial Performance in the European Context," Post-Print hal-02013902, HAL.
    6. Marco Benvenuto & Roxana Loredana Avram & Alexandru Avram & Carmine Viola, 2021. "Assessing the Impact of Corporate Governance Index on Financial Performance in the Romanian and Italian Banking Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    7. La Porta, Rafael & Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert, 2000. "Investor protection and corporate governance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1-2), pages 3-27.
    8. Emilio Barucci & Jury Falini, 2005. "Determinants of Corporate Governance in the Italian Financial Market," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 34(3), pages 371-405, November.
    9. Hyeon‐Seung Huh & Cyn‐Young Park, 2021. "A new index of globalisation: Measuring impacts of integration on economic growth and income inequality," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 409-443, February.
    10. Concetta Carnevale & Maria Mazzuca & Sergio Venturini, 2012. "Corporate Social Reporting in European Banks: The Effects on a Firm's Market Value," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 159-177, May.
    11. Entov Revold & Radygin Alexandr, 2006. "Corporate Governance and Self-regulation in Institutional Changes System," Research Paper Series, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang Lv & Lidong Fan & Bin Meng & Mohammad Zoynul Abedin & Haoyue Feng, 2023. "A Combined Evaluation Method of Corporate Social Responsibility Based on the Difference and Similarity: A Case Study of Transportation Industry in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Antonio Lorena & Elisa Aracil, 2023. "The firm under the spotlight: How stakeholder scrutiny shapes corporate social responsibility and its influence on performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1258-1272, May.
    3. Ajay Kumar & Jyotirani Gupta & Niladri Das, 2022. "Revisiting the influence of corporate sustainability practices on corporate financial performance: An evidence from the global energy sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3231-3253, November.
    4. Iram Hasan & Shveta Singh & Smita Kashiramka, 2022. "Does corporate social responsibility disclosure impact firm performance? An industry-wise analysis of Indian firms," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 10141-10181, August.
    5. Julien Lachuer & Sami Ben Jabeur, 2022. "Explainable artificial intelligence modeling for corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(7), pages 619-630, December.
    6. Raja Abid, 2023. "Corporate social (ir)responsibility towards employees and financial performance: using time to solve the chicken-egg problem," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 635-659, February.
    7. Magrizos, Solon & Apospori, Eleni & Carrigan, Marylyn & Jones, Rosalind, 2021. "Is CSR the panacea for SMEs? A study of socially responsible SMEs during economic crisis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 291-303.
    8. Lin, Woon Leong & Law, Siong Hook & Ho, Jo Ann & Sambasivan, Murali, 2019. "The causality direction of the corporate social responsibility – Corporate financial performance Nexus: Application of Panel Vector Autoregression approach," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 401-418.
    9. Maria del Mar Miralles‐Quiros & Jose Luis Miralles‐Quiros & Irene Guia Arraiano, 2017. "Sustainable Development, Sustainability Leadership and Firm Valuation: Differences across Europe," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(7), pages 1014-1028, November.
    10. Pietro Fera & Rosa Vinciguerra, 2022. "Minorities? Representativeness on the Board and their Effect on the Level of Compliance with the Italian RPTs Regulation," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2), pages 57-88.
    11. Jing Lu & Kathleen Rodenburg & Lianne Foti & Ann Pegoraro, 2022. "Are firms with better sustainability performance more resilient during crises?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3354-3370, November.
    12. Marco Botta & Luca Colombo, 2016. "Macroeconomic and Institutional Determinants of Capital Structure Decisions," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza def038, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    13. Klapper, Leora F. & Love, Inessa, 2004. "Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 703-728, November.
    14. Díez-Esteban, José María & Farinha, Jorge Bento & García-Gómez, Conrado Diego, 2016. "The role of institutional investors in propagating the 2007 financial crisis in Southern Europe," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 439-454.
    15. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    16. Benkraiem, Ramzi & Boubaker, Sabri & Brinette, Souad & Khemiri, Sabrina, 2021. "Board feminization and innovation through corporate venture capital investments: The moderating effects of independence and management skills," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    17. Oxelheim, Lars & Rafferty, Michael, 2005. "On the static efficiency of secondary bond markets," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 117-135, April.
    18. DEGEORGE, François & DING, Yuan & JEANJEAN, Thomas & STOLOWY, Hervé, 2005. "Does Analyst Following Curb Earnings Management?," HEC Research Papers Series 810, HEC Paris.
    19. Ilhan-Nas, Tulay & Okan, Tarhan & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Demirbag, Mehmet & Wood, Geoffrey & Glaister, Keith W., 2018. "Board composition, family ownership, institutional distance and the foreign equity ownership strategies of Turkish MNEs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 862-879.
    20. Ergungor, O. Emre, 2008. "Financial system structure and economic growth: Structure matters," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 292-305.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate governance; quality of governance; capitalization; principal component analysis; empirical analysis.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:2-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.