IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/umk/journl/v4y2012i1p1-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of Liberalization of Trade on Economic Welfare of Producers and Consumers of Basmati Rice

Author

Listed:
  • Ajmal Waheed

    (Department of Administrative Sciences, Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad,Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Zulfiqar

    (Kohat University of Science and Technology,Kohat, NWFP, Pakistan)

  • Anwar F. Chishti

    (Muhammad Ali Jinnah Vice Chancellor City University, Peshawar Pakistan)

Abstract

This paper examines the welfare effects of trade liberalization on Basmati rice within Pakistan’s economy. Welfare gains (or losses) in terms of consumer and producer were estimated for the pre- and post-WTO periods. Welfare gains associated with the then existing protection policies were compared with those when these policies were removed, if trade were fully liberalized for both periods. The analysis reveals that there has been a significant difference between domestic and foreign prices, suggesting tax on producers of Basmati rice in both pre- and post-WTO periods. However, the quantum of difference was comparatively less during the post-WTO period. Welfare analysis estimated higher losses for producers compared to gains to the consumers during both pre- and post-WTO periods. However, losses in the producers’ surplus were comparatively less during the post-WTO period, suggesting that certain measures were adopted by government in line with the WTO regime. Similarly simulation results demonstrate greater gains to producers than losses to consumers in the case of world market being liberalized. It is recommended that government needs to curtail tariff related interventions and, besides improving the pace of trade liberalization at domestic level, it should pursue WTO’s negotiations for early implementation of WTO’s trade liberalization on the international level.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajmal Waheed & Muhammad Zulfiqar & Anwar F. Chishti, 2012. "Implications of Liberalization of Trade on Economic Welfare of Producers and Consumers of Basmati Rice," Institutions and Economies (formerly known as International Journal of Institutions and Economies), Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Malaya, vol. 4(1), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:umk:journl:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:1-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ijie.um.edu.my/filebank/published_article/3191/Fulltext1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bouet, Antoine, 2006. "How much will trade liberalization help the poor?: comparing global trade models," Research briefs 5, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Peter A. Cornelisse & Bart Kuijpers, 1987. "A Policy Model of the Wheat and Rice Economy of Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 26(4), pages 385-400.
    3. Akhtar, Muhammad Ramzan, 1999. "Effects of Trade Liberalization on Agriculture in Pakistan: Commodity Aspects," Working Papers 32697, United Nations Centre for Alleviation of Poverty Through Secondary Crops' Development in Asia and the Pacific (CAPSA).
    4. Ackerman, Karen Z. & Dixit, Praveen M., 1999. "An Introduction To State Trading In Agriculture," Agricultural Economic Reports 33909, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. J. Edward Taylor & Antonio Yúnez Naude & Nancy Jesurun-Clements, 2010. "Does Agricultural Trade Liberalization Reduce Rural Welfare in Less Developed Countries? The Case of CAFTA," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 95-116.
    6. Akhtar, Muhammad Ramzan, 1998. "Effects of Trade Liberalization on Agriculture in Pakistan: Institutional and Structural Aspects," Working Papers 32699, United Nations Centre for Alleviation of Poverty Through Secondary Crops' Development in Asia and the Pacific (CAPSA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rahman, Mohammad Chhiddikur, 2018. "Welfare Impact of Asymmetric Price Transmission on Bangladesh Rice Consumers," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 251114, July.
    2. Rahman, Mohammad Chhiddikur, 2020. "Welfare Impact of Asymmetric Price Transmission on Bangladesh Rice Consumers," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 242248, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nilabja Ghosh, 2015. "Production, Market Structure and the Role of Public Policy: Foodgrains in the New Economy," Working Papers id:7511, eSocialSciences.
    2. Fu, Shengfei & Epperson, James E. & Ames, Glenn C.W., 2012. "Impacts of the U.S.-Central America-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) on U.S. Fruit Exports - the Apple Case," 2012 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2012, Birmingham, Alabama 119783, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    3. Giordano, Paolo & Li, Kun, 2012. "An Updated Assessment of the Trade and Poverty Nexus in Latin America," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4209, Inter-American Development Bank.
    4. Lavoie, Nathalie, 2003. "The Impact Of Reforming Wheat Importing State-Trading Enterprises On The Quality Of Wheat Imported," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21901, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Lavoie, Nathalie, 2003. "The Impact Of Reforming Wheat Importing State-Trading Enterprises On The Quality Of Wheat Imported," Working Paper Series 14512, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Department of Resource Economics.
    6. Waqar Akhtar & M. Sharif & Hassnain Shah, 2009. "Competitiveness of Pakistani Fruits in the World Market," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 125-133, Jul-Dec.
    7. Young, Linda M., 2005. "Export Competition Disciplines in the Doha Round," Trade Issues Papers 14573, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    8. Muhammad Zulfiqar & Anwar F. Chishti, 2010. "Development of Supply and Demand Functions of Pakistan’s Wheat Crop," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 91-102, Jan-Jun.
    9. Scoppola, Margherita, 2006. "Economies of Scale and Endogenous Market Structures in International Grain Trade," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25322, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Kim, Renee B. & Veeman, Michele M., 2001. "Korean Beef Import Preferences: Implications For Trade Patterns In The Twenty First Century," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14561, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    11. Gulzar Ali & Ghulam Mustafa & Said Zamin Shah, 2020. "Performance of Agriculture Sector in Foreign Trade of Pakistan," Global Economics Review, Humanity Only, vol. 5(1), pages 12-23, March.
    12. Ajewole, Kayode & Beckman, Jayson & Gerval, Adam & Johnson, William & Morgan, Stephen & Sabala, Ethan, 2022. "Do Free Trade Agreements Benefit Developing Countries? An Examination of U.S. Agreements," USDA Miscellaneous 329076, United States Department of Agriculture.
    13. Fu, Shengfei & Epperson, James E. & Ames, Glenn C.W., 2012. "Impacts of the U.S.-Central America-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement - the Apple Case," 2012 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2012, Birmingham, Alabama 119782, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    14. Filipski, Mateusz & Edward Taylor, J. & Msangi, Siwa, 2011. "Effects of Free Trade on Women and Immigrants: CAFTA and the Rural Dominican Republic," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1862-1877.
    15. Yoon, Jung-Hyun & Lim, Song Soo, 2013. "Potential trade distortion effects of state trading enterprises under the tariff-rate quota scheme," Economics Discussion Papers 2013-22, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Seema Bathla, 2006. "Trade Policy Reforms and Openness of Indian Agriculture," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 7(1), pages 19-53, March.
    17. Pall, Zsombor & Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr & Teuber, Ramona & Glauben, Thomas, 2011. "Wheat trade - does Russia price discriminate across export destinations?," IAMO Forum 2011: Will the "BRICs Decade" Continue? – Prospects for Trade and Growth 15, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO).
    18. Roeber, Ronald, 2002. "Linear Feedback Between European Wheat Export Refunds And World Wheat Prices," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19847, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Schmitz, Troy G., 2002. "Measuring Inefficiency In The Presence Of An Export Tax, An Import Tariff, And A State Trading Enterprise," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(1), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Liefert, William M., 2005. "Decomposing Changes in Agricultural Price Gaps," Working Papers 14592, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agriculture in trade liberalization; agricultural policy; Basmati rice; government policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:umk:journl:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:1-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Teoh Wern Jun (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feaummy.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.