IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v28y2016i3p417-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological institutionalism as a transformation of structural econometrics

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel Boumans

Abstract

I agree with Nell and Errouaki that an econometrics based on neoclassical economic theory fails to develop any insight into deep structures. But my methodology differs slightly from theirs because of my view that an econometrics based on any economic theory would fail in this sense. Economics is an inexact science, incapable of providing a complete set of causal factors to explain any economic phenomenon. I arrive at a different call for more fieldwork in econometrics due to a somewhat different reading of the criticisms of Trygve Haavelmo, Wassily Leontief, the young Tjalling Koopmans and Oskar Morgenstern. These economists not only shared the idea that economic structure is different in nature from natural laws and that statistical analysis alone is not enough to arrive at knowledge of this structure, but also that economic theory as an additional source of knowledge would not be sufficient either. Another additional source of knowledge is needed—that is, field expertise.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel Boumans, 2016. "Methodological institutionalism as a transformation of structural econometrics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 417-425, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:28:y:2016:i:3:p:417-425
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2016.1154752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2016.1154752
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2016.1154752?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcel Boumans, 2014. "Haavelmo’s Epistemology for an Inexact Science," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 211-229, Summer.
    2. Carter, Anne P. & Petri, Peter A., 1989. "Leontief's contribution to economics," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 7-30.
    3. Tjalling Koopmans, 1941. "The Logic of Econometric Business-Cycle Research," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49, pages 157-157.
    4. Franses, Philip Hans, 2008. "Merging models and experts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 31-33.
    5. Arthur W. Marget, 1929. "Morgenstern on the Methodology of Economic Forecasting," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37, pages 312-312.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vincent Carret, 2022. "Understanding the bitterness of Wassily Leontief: Postwar success and failures of input-output techniques," Working Papers halshs-03603527, HAL.
    2. Vincent Carret, 2022. "Investment Planning and the Input-Output Model in Postwar Europe," Working Papers hal-03895580, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher L. Gilbert & Duo Qin, 2005. "The First Fifty Years of Modern Econometrics," Working Papers 544, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    2. Lenzen, Manfred & Dey, Christopher & Foran, Barney, 2004. "Energy requirements of Sydney households," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 375-399, July.
    3. Frankfurter, George M. & McGoun, Elton G., 1999. "Ideology and the theory of financial economics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 159-177, June.
    4. Philip Hans Franses & Michael McAleer & Rianne Legerstee, 2009. "Expert opinion versus expertise in forecasting," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 63(3), pages 334-346, August.
    5. Christopher L. Gilbert & Duo Qin, 2005. "The First Fifty Years of Modern Econometrics," Working Papers 544, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    6. Youssef Boulaksil & Philip Hans Franses, 2009. "Experts' Stated Behavior," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 168-171, April.
      • Boulaksil, Y. & Franses, Ph.H.B.F., 2008. "Experts' Stated Behavior," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2008-001-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. David F. Hendry & Michael P. Clements, 1994. "Can Econometrics Improve Economic Forecasting?," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 130(III), pages 267-298, September.
    8. Bjerkholt, Olav, 2015. "Trygve Haavelmo At The Cowles Commission," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 1-84, February.
    9. Michael P. Clements & David F. Hendry, 2005. "Guest Editors’ Introduction: Information in Economic Forecasting," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 67(s1), pages 713-753, December.
    10. Arvan, Meysam & Fahimnia, Behnam & Reisi, Mohsen & Siemsen, Enno, 2019. "Integrating human judgement into quantitative forecasting methods: A review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 237-252.
    11. Fenfen Wei & Nanping Feng & Kevin H. Zhang, 2017. "Innovation Capability and Innovation Talents: Evidence from China Based on a Quantile Regression Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Chang, Chia-Lin & Franses, Philip Hans & McAleer, Michael, 2011. "How accurate are government forecasts of economic fundamentals? The case of Taiwan," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 1066-1075, October.
    13. Robert Goldfarb & H. O. Stekler & Joel David, 2005. "Methodological issues in forecasting: Insights from the egregious business forecast errors of late 1930," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 517-542.
    14. Richard M. Ebeling, 2014. "Hayek and Mises," Chapters, in: Roger W. Garrison & Norman Barry (ed.), Elgar Companion to Hayekian Economics, chapter 7, pages 138-164, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Wiedenhofer, Dominik & Lenzen, Manfred & Steinberger, Julia K., 2013. "Energy requirements of consumption: Urban form, climatic and socio-economic factors, rebounds and their policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 696-707.
    16. Claudio Felisoni de Angelo & Ronaldo Zwicker & Nuno Manoel Martins Dias Fouto & Marcos Roberto Luppe, 2011. "Temporal series and neural networks: a comparative analysis of techniques in the Brazilian retail sales forecast," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 8(2), pages 01-21, April.
    17. Randolph Beard, T. & Ford, George S. & Kim, Hyeongwoo, 2014. "Capital investment and employment in the information sector," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 371-382.
    18. Becchio Giandomenica, 2005. "Economic theory of wiener kreis and mathematische kolloquiun. The complex role of Karl Menger," CESMEP Working Papers 200507, University of Turin.
    19. Philip E. Mirowski, 2012. "The Cowles Commission as an Anti-Keynesian Stronghold 1943–54," Chapters, in: Microfoundations Reconsidered, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Anh Quynh Tang & Takeshi Mizunoya, 2021. "A Study on Selecting Greenhouse Gas Reduction Options: A Simulation Analysis for Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:28:y:2016:i:3:p:417-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.