IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v44y2017i5p603-622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Duration analysis for recurrent ship accidents

Author

Listed:
  • Meifeng Luo
  • Sung-Ho Shin
  • Young-Tae Chang

Abstract

About 63% of the world’s shipping accidents are recurrent—they occur to ships that have already experienced at least one prior accident. Therefore, reducing recurrent accidents can contribute significantly to maritime safety. We study the factors affecting both first and recurrent accidents, by focusing on the duration between two accidents. Cox proportional hazard models are applied to ship accident data from 1996 to 2015, and the results identify which ships have a high risk of recurrent accidents, based on ship attributes, ship supply and market conditions, shipbuilding country, previous accident type, and ship type. The recurrent rate is high when the ship involved in the accident is old, small, flies a flag of convenience, and has no detention record. In addition, the accident risk increases when the shipping market faces a high bunker price, overcapacity in supply, a high time charter rate, or low newbuilding price. On the other hand, ships built in China and Japan have lower recurrent accident rates than those built elsewhere, although ships built in China have earlier first accidents than do others. General cargo ships have the highest recurrent accident rate, followed by dry bulkers, container ships, and tankers, in that order.

Suggested Citation

  • Meifeng Luo & Sung-Ho Shin & Young-Tae Chang, 2017. "Duration analysis for recurrent ship accidents," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 603-622, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:44:y:2017:i:5:p:603-622
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2017.1319983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2017.1319983
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2017.1319983?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bijwaard, Govert E. & Knapp, Sabine, 2009. "Analysis of ship life cycles--The impact of economic cycles and ship inspections," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 350-369, March.
    2. Emre Akyuz & Ilker Akgun & Metin Celik, 2016. "A fuzzy failure mode and effects approach to analyse concentrated inspection campaigns on board ships," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 887-908, October.
    3. Metaxas, B. N., 1981. "Flags of convenience," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 52-66, January.
    4. Wayne K Talley, 1999. "Determinants of Ship Accident Seaworthiness," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 1(2), pages 1-14, December.
    5. K. X. Li & J. Wonham, 1999. "Who is safe and who is at risk: a study of 20-year-record on accident total loss in different flags," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 137-144, April.
    6. Luca Urciuoli, 2016. "Port security training and education in Europe—a framework and a roadmap to harmonization," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 580-596, July.
    7. Yishu Zheng & Wayne K. Talley & Di Jin & ManWo Ng, 2016. "Crew injuries in container vessel accidents," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 541-551, July.
    8. Fan, Lixian & Luo, Meifeng & Yin, Jinbo, 2014. "Flag choice and Port State Control inspections—Empirical evidence using a simultaneous model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 350-357.
    9. Jørn Fenstad & Øyvind Dahl & Trond Kongsvik, 2016. "Shipboard safety: exploring organizational and regulatory factors," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 552-568, July.
    10. Meifeng Luo & Lixian Fan & Liming Liu, 2009. "An econometric analysis for container shipping market," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6), pages 507-523, December.
    11. Alexandre Alapetite & Igor Kozine, 2017. "Safe manning of merchant ships: an approach and computer tool," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 323-335, April.
    12. Pedrielli, Giulia & Lee, Loo Hay & Ng, Szu Hui, 2015. "Optimal bunkering contract in a buyer–seller supply chain under price and consumption uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 77-94.
    13. Angelos Pantouvakis & Maria Karakasnaki, 2016. "An empirical assessment of ISM Code effectiveness on performance: the role of ISO certification," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 874-886, October.
    14. Angela Bergantino & Peter Marlow, 1998. "Factors influencing the choice of flag: empirical evidence," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 157-174, January.
    15. Sabine Knapp & Philip Hans Franses, 2007. "A global view on port state control: econometric analysis of the differences across port state control regimes," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 453-482, October.
    16. Roberts, Stephen E. & Marlow, Peter B., 2002. "Casualties in dry bulk shipping (1963-1996)," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 437-450, November.
    17. Notteboom, Theo E. & Vernimmen, Bert, 2009. "The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 325-337.
    18. Wayne Talley, 1999. "The safety of sea transport: determinants of crew injuries," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(11), pages 1365-1372.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria I. Chondrokouki & Andrianos E. Tsekrekos, 2022. "Freight rate volatility and flag-switching decisions," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 395-414, June.
    2. Antão, P. & Sun, S. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2023. "Quantitative assessment of ship collision risk influencing factors from worldwide accident and fleet data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yin, Jingbo & Fan, Lixian & Li, Kevin X., 2018. "Second ship registry in flag choice mechanism: The implications for China in promoting a maritime cluster policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 152-165.
    2. Fan, Lixian & Luo, Meifeng & Yin, Jinbo, 2014. "Flag choice and Port State Control inspections—Empirical evidence using a simultaneous model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 350-357.
    3. François Fulconis & Raphael Lissillour, 2021. "Toward a behavioral approach of international shipping: a study of the inter-organisational dynamics of maritime safety," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Heij, C. & Knapp, S., 2018. "Predictive power of inspection outcomes for future shipping accidents," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2018-09, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    5. Wang, Shuaian & Yan, Ran & Qu, Xiaobo, 2019. "Development of a non-parametric classifier: Effective identification, algorithm, and applications in port state control for maritime transportation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 129-157.
    6. Pierre Cariou & François-Charles Wolff, 2011. "Do Port State Control Inspections Influence Flag- and Class-hopping Phenomena in Shipping?," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 45(2), pages 155-177, May.
    7. Hoffmann, Jan & Sanchez, Ricardo J. & Talley, Wayne K., 2004. "6. Determinants Of Vessel Flag," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 173-219, January.
    8. Manolis Kavussanos & Siri Pettersen Strandenes & Helen Thanopoulou, 2022. "Special issue: ends of eras and new beginnings: twenty-first century challenges for shipping," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 347-367, June.
    9. Heij, C. & Knapp, S., 2014. "Effects of wind strength and wave height on ship incident risk: regional trends and seasonality," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2014-15, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    10. Perepelkin, M. & Knapp, S. & Perepelkin, G. & de Pooter, M.D., 2009. "A method to measure flag performance for the shipping industry," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2009-04, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    11. Jose Manuel Prieto & Victor Amor & Ignacio Turias & David Almorza & Francisco Piniella, 2021. "Evaluation of Paris MoU Maritime Inspections Using a STATIS Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Knapp, S. & van de Velden, M., 2010. "Visualization of Ship Risk Profiles for the Shipping Industry," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2010-013-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    13. Esma Gül Emecen Kara, 2016. "Risk Assessment in the Istanbul Strait Using Black Sea MOU Port State Control Inspections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Hristos Karahalios, 2017. "Evaluating the knowledge of experts in the maritime regulatory field," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 426-441, May.
    15. Xiao, Yi & Qi, Guanqiu & Jin, Mengjie & Yuen, Kum Fai & Chen, Zhuo & Li, Kevin X., 2021. "Efficiency of Port State Control inspection regimes: A comparative study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-172.
    16. Maria I. Chondrokouki & Andrianos E. Tsekrekos, 2022. "Freight rate volatility and flag-switching decisions," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 395-414, June.
    17. Knapp, S. & Bijwaard, G.E. & Heij, C., 2010. "Estimated Incident Cost Savings in Shipping Due to Inspections," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-28, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    18. Hristos Karahalios, 2021. "Contribution of PSC Authorities to Ship Accident Prevention," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Kummer, Sebastian & Dieplinger, Maria & Fürst, Elmar, 2014. "Flagging out in road freight transport: a strategy to reduce corporate costs in a competitive environment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 141-150.
    20. Heij, C. & Bijwaard, G.E. & Knapp, S., 2010. "Ship Inspection Strategies: Effects on Maritime Safety and Environmental Protection," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-33, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:44:y:2017:i:5:p:603-622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.