IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v61y2009i4d10.1007_bf03373659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Abschlussprüfung und Beratung - Eine experimentelle Analyse der Auswirkungen auf Unabhängigkeitswahrnehmungen deutscher Aufsichtsräte

Author

Listed:
  • Roger Meuwissen

    (University of Maastricht)

  • Reiner Quick

    (Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Die Verknüpfung von Prüfungs- und Beratungstätigkeiten gefährdet die Unabhängigkeit des Abschlussprüfers. Dadurch erhöhen sich mandantenspezifische Quasirenten und die Gefahr für Unabhängigkeitsbeeinträchtigungen steigt. Aus der bisherigen, anglo-amerikanisch dominierten Forschung lässt sich erkennen, dass gleichzeitige Beratung weniger die tatsächliche sondern eher die wahrgenommene Unabhängigkeit gefährdet. Die wenigen deutschen Studien erkennen dagegen mehrheitlich keinen negativen Einfluss auf Unabhängigkeitswahrnehmungen. Über eine experimentelle Studie wurde der Einfluss auf die Unabhängigkeitswahrnehmungen der Aufsichtsräte der DAX 30-, MDAX-, SDAX- und TechDAX-Unternehmen untersucht. Betrachtet wurden die Steuerberatung, die Personalberatung und die Beratung in Bezug auf Finanzinformationssysteme. Alle drei Leistungen entfalten eine negative Wirkung. Einzig die Personalberatung ist einem Abschlussprüfer einer kapitalmarktorientierten Gesellschaft in Deutschland nicht explizit untersagt. Ihr negativer Einfluss war aber am stärksten. Über univariate und multivariate Analysen ließ sich des Weiteren zeigen, dass das Ausmaß der Beeinträchtigung der wahrgenommenen Unabhängigkeit von der Art der Beratungsleistung abhängt. Ein generelles Beratungsverbot erscheint daher nicht als erforderlich. Zudem wurde deutlich, dass Unabhängigkeitswahrnehmungen umso stärker beeinflusst werden, je geringer die Erfahrungen der Aufsichtsräte und deren Vertrauen in Abschlussprüfer sind. Dagegen konnten keine Unterschiede zwischen den Wahrnehmungen von Aktionärs- und Arbeitnehmervertretern identifiziert werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger Meuwissen & Reiner Quick, 2009. "Abschlussprüfung und Beratung - Eine experimentelle Analyse der Auswirkungen auf Unabhängigkeitswahrnehmungen deutscher Aufsichtsräte," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 382-415, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:61:y:2009:i:4:d:10.1007_bf03373659
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03373659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03373659
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03373659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baiman, S & Evans, Jh & Nagarajan, Nj, 1991. "Collusion In Auditing," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 1-18.
    2. Jeffrey W. Schatzberg & Galen R. Sevcik, 1994. "A Multiperiod Model and Experimental Evidence of Independence and “Lowballing†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 137-174, June.
    3. Antle, R, 1984. "Auditor Independence," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 1-20.
    4. Kofman, Fred & Lawarree, Jacques, 1996. "On the optimality of allowing collusion," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 383-407, September.
    5. Baiman, S & Evans, Jh & Noel, J, 1987. "Optimal-Contracts With A Utility-Maximizing Auditor," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 217-244.
    6. Michael J. Ferguson & Gim S. Seow & Danqing Young, 2004. "Nonaudit Services and Earnings Management: UK Evidence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 813-841, December.
    7. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513578910132303 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Bin N. Srinidhi & Ferdinand A. Gul, 2007. "The Differential Effects of Auditors' Nonaudit and Audit Fees on Accrual Quality," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 595-629, June.
    9. David Hay & Robert Knechel & Vivian Li, 2006. "Non‐audit Services and Auditor Independence: New Zealand Evidence," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5‐6), pages 715-734, June.
    10. Craswell, Allen & Stokes, Donald J. & Laughton, Janet, 2002. "Auditor independence and fee dependence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 253-275, June.
    11. David F. Larcker & Scott A. Richardson, 2004. "Fees Paid to Audit Firms, Accrual Choices, and Corporate Governance," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 625-658, June.
    12. Mckinley, S & Pany, K & Reckers, Pmj, 1985. "An Examination Of The Influence Of Cpa Firm Type, Size, And Mas Provision On Loan Officer Decisions And Perceptions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 887-896.
    13. Jennifer R. Joe & Scott D. Vandervelde, 2007. "Do Auditor†Provided Nonaudit Services Improve Audit Effectiveness?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 467-487, June.
    14. Ferdinand A. Gul, 1989. "Bankers’ Perceptions of Factors Affecting Auditor Independence," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 2(3), pages 1-1, December.
    15. Dykxhoorn, Hans J. & Sinning, Kathleen E., 1982. "Perceptions of auditor independence: Its perceived effect on the loan and investment decisions of German financial statement users," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 337-347, October.
    16. Reiner Quick & Bent Warming-Rasmussen, 2005. "The impact of MAS on perceived auditor independence-some evidence from Denmark," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 137-168, June.
    17. Pany, Kurt & Reckers, P. M. J., 1983. "Auditor independence and nonaudit services : Director views and their policy implications," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 43-62.
    18. Paul K. Chaney & Kirk L. Philipich, 2002. "Shredded Reputation: The Cost of Audit Failure," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 1221-1245, September.
    19. Ettredge, M & Greenberg, R, 1990. "Determinants Of Fee Cutting On Initial Audit Engagements," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 198-210.
    20. Nicholas Dopuch & Ronald R. King & Rachel Schwartz, 2003. "Independence in Appearance and in Fact: An Experimental Investigation," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 79-114, March.
    21. Dopuch, N & King, Rr, 1991. "The Impact Of Mas On Auditors Independence - An Experimental Markets Study," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29, pages 60-98.
    22. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    23. Glezen, Gw & Millar, Ja, 1985. "An Empirical-Investigation Of Stockholder Reaction To Disclosures Required By Asr No-250," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 859-870.
    24. Dittmann, Ingolf, 1999. "How reliable should auditors be?: optimal monitoring in principal-agent relationships," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 523-546, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reiner Quick & Matthias Sattler, 2012. "Erwiderung auf Hansrudi Lenz: Eine wissenschaftsethische Anmerkung zum Beitrag „Beeinträchtigen Beratungsleistungen die Urteilsfreiheit des Abschlussprüfers? Zum Einfluss von Beratungshonoraren auf di," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 271-279, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bugeja, Martin, 2011. "Takeover premiums and the perception of auditor independence and reputation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 278-293.
    2. Domenico Campa & Ray Donnelly, 2016. "Non-audit services provided to audit clients, independence of mind and independence in appearance: latest evidence from large UK listed companies," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(4), pages 422-449, June.
    3. .Reiner Quick & Matthias Sattler, 2011. "Beeinträchtigen Beratungsleistungen die Urteilsfreiheit des Abschlussprüfers? Zum Einfluss von Beratungshonoraren auf diskretionäre Periodenabgrenzungen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 310-343, June.
    4. Knechel, W. Robert & Thomas, Edward & Driskill, Matthew, 2020. "Understanding financial auditing from a service perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Daniela Hohenfels & Reiner Quick, 2020. "Non-audit services and audit quality: evidence from Germany," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 959-1007, October.
    6. Meuwissen, Roger & Quick, Reiner, 2019. "The effects of non-audit services on auditor independence: An experimental investigation of supervisory board members’ perceptions," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-1.
    7. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    8. Reiner Quick & Matthias Sattler, 2012. "Erwiderung auf Hansrudi Lenz: Eine wissenschaftsethische Anmerkung zum Beitrag „Beeinträchtigen Beratungsleistungen die Urteilsfreiheit des Abschlussprüfers? Zum Einfluss von Beratungshonoraren auf di," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 271-279, May.
    9. Anastasia Kraft & Kerstin Lopatta, 2016. "Auditor fees, discretionary book-tax differences, and tax avoidance," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 127-155.
    10. Tobias Svanstr�m, 2013. "Non-audit Services and Audit Quality: Evidence from Private Firms," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 337-366, June.
    11. Svanberg, Jan & Öhman, Peter & Neidermeyer, Presha E., 2019. "Auditor objectivity as a function of auditor negotiation self-efficacy beliefs," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 121-131.
    12. William R. Kinney & Zoe‐Vonna Palmrose & Susan Scholz, 2004. "Auditor Independence, Non‐Audit Services, and Restatements: Was the U.S. Government Right?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 561-588, June.
    13. Dart, Eleanor, 2011. "UK investors’ perceptions of auditor independence," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 173-185.
    14. Jeffrey W. Schatzberg & Galen R. Sevcik, 1994. "A Multiperiod Model and Experimental Evidence of Independence and “Lowballing†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 137-174, June.
    15. Arrunada, Benito, 1999. "The provision of non-audit services by auditors let the market evolve and decide," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 513-531, December.
    16. Reshma Kumari Tiwari & Jasojit Debnath, 2021. "Joint Provision of Non-audit Services to Audit Clients: Empirical Evidences from India," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 46(3), pages 153-165, September.
    17. Caitlin Ruddock & Sarah J. Taylor & Stephen L. Taylor, 2006. "Nonaudit Services and Earnings Conservatism: Is Auditor Independence Impaired?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 701-746, September.
    18. Clive S. Lennox & Asad Kausar, 2017. "Estimation risk and auditor conservatism," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 185-216, March.
    19. Paul A. Griffin & David H. Lont & Yuan Sun, 2009. "Governance regulatory changes, International Financial Reporting Standards adoption, and New Zealand audit and non‐audit fees: empirical evidence," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 49(4), pages 697-724, December.
    20. Sarowar Hossain & Jeff Coulton & Jenny Jing Wang, 2023. "Client Importance and Audit Quality at the Individual Audit Partner, Office, and Firm Levels," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(2), pages 650-696, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    M42;

    JEL classification:

    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:61:y:2009:i:4:d:10.1007_bf03373659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.