IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i9d10.1007_s10668-021-01889-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing an integrated model for strawberry growers’ behavior toward implementation of good agricultural practices in Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Behzad Ranjbar

    (University of Zanjan)

  • Amir Naeimi

    (University of Zanjan)

  • Mohammad Badsar

    (University of Zanjan)

Abstract

Good agricultural practices (GAPs) include conscious agricultural techniques that are not harmful to human health and the environment, with the goal of protecting natural resources, as well as ensuring health and food security. The use of these practices may be influenced by various psychological and social factors. Thus, the main purpose of this study was to design an integrated model for strawberry growers’ behavior toward implementation of good agricultural practices (GAPs) in Iran. The research framework was developed by integrating the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and technology acceptance model (TAM). The integrated model was empirically tested using data collected from a survey of 200 strawberry growers. The findings of structural equation modeling showed that perceived ease of use (PEU), perceived behavior control (PBC), and behavioral intention (BI) of strawberry growers significantly influenced the behavior of growers toward using GAPs (BGAPs). These factors explained 30% of the variance in behavior of growers to use GAPs. The study also supported the significant indirect effect of perceived usefulness (PU), PEU, subjective norms, PBC, and attitudes on BGAPs. Overall, the calculated total effects of factors on BGAPs indicated that PBC, PEU, and behavioral intention were the three important determinants of growers’ behavior to use GAPs, respectively. The findings of this study show integrating of TAM plus TPB and particularly considering a direct relationship between PEU and BGAPs in this model influenced the predictive power significantly. It can be a comprehensive, complete, and understandable framework for explaining clienteles' behavior to apply good agricultural practices and be used by other researchers for developing future research and policy makers to make the right and suitable decisions to develop GAPs in farmlands.

Suggested Citation

  • Behzad Ranjbar & Amir Naeimi & Mohammad Badsar, 2022. "Designing an integrated model for strawberry growers’ behavior toward implementation of good agricultural practices in Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 10924-10944, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01889-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01889-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01889-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01889-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan, Chin-Seang & Ooi, Hooi-Yin & Goh, Yen-Nee, 2017. "A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict consumers’ purchase intention for energy-efficient household appliances in Malaysia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 459-471.
    2. Yadav, Rambalak & Pathak, Govind S., 2017. "Determinants of Consumers' Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 114-122.
    3. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    4. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    5. Chiou‐Fong Wei & Chang‐Tang Chiang & Tun‐Chih Kou & Bruce C Y Lee, 2017. "Toward Sustainable Livelihoods: Investigating the Drivers of Purchase Behavior for Green Products," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 626-639, July.
    6. Khoshkam, Mana & Marzuki, Azizan & Al-Mulali, Usama, 2016. "Socio-demographic effects on Anzali wetland tourism development," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 96-106.
    7. Joshi, Yatish & Rahman, Zillur, 2019. "Consumers' Sustainable Purchase Behaviour: Modeling the Impact of Psychological Factors," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 235-243.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Hao & Yingting Wang & Qiuwei Wu & Shiwei Sun & Weilu Wang & Menglin Cui, 2020. "What affects residents' participation in the circular economy for sustainable development? Evidence from China," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1251-1268, September.
    2. Peng Shi & Frank Vanclay & Jin Yu, 2022. "Post-Resettlement Support Policies, Psychological Factors, and Farmers’ Homestead Exit Intention and Behavior," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Hsiao-Ping Chang & Chun-Chieh Ma & Han-Shen Chen, 2019. "Climate Change and Consumer’s Attitude toward Insect Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Meles, Tensay Hadush & Ryan, Lisa & Mukherjee, Sanghamitra C., 2022. "Heterogeneity in preferences for renewable home heating systems among Irish households," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    5. Xiaojian Hu & Nan Wu & Nuo Chen, 2021. "Young People’s Behavioral Intentions towards Low-Carbon Travel: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Jana Hojnik & Mitja Ruzzier & Maja Konečnik Ruzzier, 2019. "Transition towards Sustainability: Adoption of Eco-Products among Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-29, August.
    7. Taneja, Shilpa & Ali, Liaqat, 2021. "Determinants of customers’ intentions towards environmentally sustainable banking: Testing the structural model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Xiaoyun Zhang & Feng Dong, 2020. "Why Do Consumers Make Green Purchase Decisions? Insights from a Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Saeid Karimi & Genovaitė Liobikienė & Heshmatollah Saadi & Fatemeh Sepahvand, 2021. "The Influence of Media Usage on Iranian Students’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors: An Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Muhammad Yaseen Bhutto & Xiaohui Liu & Yasir Ali Soomro & Myriam Ertz & Yasser Baeshen, 2020. "Adoption of Energy-Efficient Home Appliances: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Tewari, Alok & Mathur, Smriti & Srivastava, Smriti & Gangwar, Divya, 2022. "Examining the role of receptivity to green communication, altruism and openness to change on young consumers’ intention to purchase green apparel: A multi-analytical approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    12. Valentin, Alvin Patrick M. & Hechanova, Ma Regina M., 2023. "Addressing plastic pollution through green consumption: Predicting intentions to use menstrual cups in the Philippines," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. Khuong, Phuong M. & Scheller, Fabian & McKenna, Russell & Keles, Dogan & Fichtner, Wolf, 2020. "Willingness to pay for residential PV: Reconciling gaps between acceptance and adoption," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 46, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    14. Hsiu‐Hua Chang & Shin‐Hua Tsai & Chun‐Chen Huang, 2019. "Sustainable development: The effects of environmental policy disclosure in advertising," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(8), pages 1497-1506, December.
    15. Saeed Siyal & Munawar Javed Ahmed & Riaz Ahmad & Bushra Shahzad Khan & Chunlin Xin, 2021. "Factors Influencing Green Purchase Intention: Moderating Role of Green Brand Knowledge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Nuttakrij Apipuchayakul & Sujitra Vassanadumrongdee, 2020. "Factors Affecting the Consumption of Energy-Efficient Lighting Products: Exploring Purchase Behaviors of Thai Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Katharina Stolz, 2022. "Why Do(n’t) We Buy Second-Hand Luxury Products?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Leibao Zhang & Yanli Fan & Wenyu Zhang & Shuai Zhang, 2019. "Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to Explain the Effects of Cognitive Factors across Different Kinds of Green Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Rakesh Kumar & Kishore Kumar & Rubee Singh & José Carlos Sá & Sandro Carvalho & Gilberto Santos, 2023. "Modeling Environmentally Conscious Purchase Behavior: Examining the Role of Ethical Obligation and Green Self-Identity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    20. Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Shen, Jie & Ashfaq, Muhammad & Shahzad, Mohsin, 2021. "Social media and sustainable purchasing attitude: Role of trust in social media and environmental effectiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01889-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.