IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/dyngam/v8y2018i3d10.1007_s13235-018-0254-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Dynamic Collective Choice Model with an Advertiser

Author

Listed:
  • Rabih Salhab

    (Polytechnique Montreal and GERAD)

  • Roland P. Malhamé

    (Polytechnique Montreal and GERAD)

  • Jerome Le Ny

    (Polytechnique Montreal and GERAD)

Abstract

This paper studies a dynamic collective choice model in the presence of an advertiser, where a large number of consumers are choosing between two alternatives. Their choices are influenced by the group’s aggregate choice and an advertising effect. The latter is produced by an advertiser making investments to convince as many consumers as possible to choose a specific alternative. In schools, for example, teenagers’ decisions to smoke are considerably affected by their peers’ decisions, as well as the ministry of health campaigns against smoking. We model the problem as a Stackelberg dynamic game, where the advertiser makes its investment decision first, and then the consumers choose one of the alternatives. On the methodological side, we use the theory of mean field games to solve the game for a continuum of consumers. This allows us to describe the consumers’ individual and aggregate behaviors, and the advertiser’s optimal investment strategies. When the consumers have sufficiently diverse a priori opinions toward the alternatives, we show that a unique Nash equilibrium exists between them, which predicts the distribution of choices over the alternatives, and the advertiser can always make optimal investments. For a certain uniform distribution of a priori opinions, we give an explicit form of the advertiser’s optimal investment strategy and of the consumers’ optimal choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Rabih Salhab & Roland P. Malhamé & Jerome Le Ny, 2018. "A Dynamic Collective Choice Model with an Advertiser," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 490-506, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:dyngam:v:8:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s13235-018-0254-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s13235-018-0254-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13235-018-0254-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13235-018-0254-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ,, 2003. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 691-705, August.
    2. ,, 2003. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(5), pages 879-883, October.
    3. William A. Brock & Steven N. Durlauf, 2001. "Discrete Choice with Social Interactions," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 68(2), pages 235-260.
    4. Engelbert Dockner & Steffen Jørgensen, 1988. "Optimal Advertising Policies for Diffusion Models of New Product Innovation in Monopolistic Situations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 119-130, January.
    5. ,, 2003. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(6), pages 1195-1198, December.
    6. Ryo Nakajima, 2007. "Measuring Peer Effects on Youth Smoking Behaviour," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 74(3), pages 897-935.
    7. Erickson, Gary M., 1995. "Differential game models of advertising competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 431-438, June.
    8. ,, 2003. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 225-228, February.
    9. ,, 2003. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 411-413, April.
    10. John D. C. Little & Leonard M. Lodish, 1969. "A Media Planning Calculus," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 1-35, February.
    11. Bhat, Chandra R. & Guo, Jessica, 2004. "A mixed spatially correlated logit model: formulation and application to residential choice modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 147-168, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steffen Jørgensen & Ngo Long & Gerhard Sorger, 2018. "Preface: Special issue of Dynamic Games and Applications in Memory of Professor Engelbert J. Dockner," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 457-467, September.
    2. Salhab, Rabih & Le Ny, Jérôme & Malhamé, Roland P. & Zaccour, Georges, 2022. "Dynamic marketing policies with rating-sensitive consumers: A mean-field games approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 1079-1093.
    3. Chaab, Jafar & Salhab, Rabih & Zaccour, Georges, 2022. "Dynamic pricing and advertising in the presence of strategic consumers and social contagion: A mean-field game approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dario Bauso & Raffaele Pesenti & Marco Tolotti, 2016. "Opinion Dynamics and Stubbornness Via Multi-Population Mean-Field Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 266-293, July.
    2. Paolo Dai Pra & Elena Sartori & Marco Tolotti, 2019. "Climb on the Bandwagon: Consensus and Periodicity in a Lifetime Utility Model with Strategic Interactions," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 1061-1075, December.
    3. Yakut, Oguz, 2021. "Implementation of hydraulically driven barrel shooting control by utilizing artificial neural networks," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1206-1223.
    4. X. Qin & G. Huang, 2009. "An Inexact Chance-constrained Quadratic Programming Model for Stream Water Quality Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(4), pages 661-695, March.
    5. Md. Yousuf Gazi & Khandakar Tahmida Tafhim, 2019. "Investigation of Heavy-mineral Deposits Using Multispectral Satellite Imagery in the Eastern Coastal Margin of Bangladesh," Earth Sciences Malaysia (ESMY), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 16-22, October.
    6. Minghe Sun, 2005. "Warm-Start Routines for Solving Augmented Weighted Tchebycheff Network Programs in Multiple-Objective Network Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 422-437, November.
    7. François Clautiaux & Cláudio Alves & José Valério de Carvalho & Jürgen Rietz, 2011. "New Stabilization Procedures for the Cutting Stock Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 530-545, November.
    8. Tansel, Aysit & Karao?lan, Deniz, 2016. "The Causal Effect of Education on Health Behaviors: Evidence from Turkey," IZA Discussion Papers 10020, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Timothy K.M. Beatty & Erling Røed Larsen & Dag Einar Sommervoll, 2005. "Measuring the Price of Housing Consumption for Owners in the CPI," Discussion Papers 427, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    10. Melega, Gislaine Mara & de Araujo, Silvio Alexandre & Jans, Raf, 2018. "Classification and literature review of integrated lot-sizing and cutting stock problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 1-19.
    11. Roth, Alvin E. & Sonmez, Tayfun & Utku Unver, M., 2005. "Pairwise kidney exchange," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 151-188, December.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5389 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Wong, Patricia J.Y., 2015. "Eigenvalues of a general class of boundary value problem with derivative-dependent nonlinearity," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 908-930.
    14. A. Bensoussan & K. Sung & S. Yam, 2013. "Linear–Quadratic Time-Inconsistent Mean Field Games," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 537-552, December.
    15. Kojima, Fuhito, 2013. "Efficient resource allocation under multi-unit demand," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1-14.
    16. Chein-Shan Liu & Zhuojia Fu & Chung-Lun Kuo, 2017. "Directional Method of Fundamental Solutions for Three-dimensional Laplace Equation," Journal of Mathematics Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 112-123, December.
    17. Alberto Cabada & Om Kalthoum Wanassi, 2020. "Existence Results for Nonlinear Fractional Problems with Non-Homogeneous Integral Boundary Conditions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, February.
    18. Odysseas Kosmas & Pieter Boom & Andrey P. Jivkov, 2021. "On the Geometric Description of Nonlinear Elasticity via an Energy Approach Using Barycentric Coordinates," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Hossein Karshenas & Concha Bielza & Pedro Larrañaga, 2015. "Interval-based ranking in noisy evolutionary multi-objective optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 517-555, June.
    20. B. S. C. Campello & C. T. L. S. Ghidini & A. O. C. Ayres & W. A. Oliveira, 2022. "A residual recombination heuristic for one-dimensional cutting stock problems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(1), pages 194-220, April.
    21. Beddoe, Gareth R. & Petrovic, Sanja, 2006. "Selecting and weighting features using a genetic algorithm in a case-based reasoning approach to personnel rostering," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 649-671, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:dyngam:v:8:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s13235-018-0254-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.