IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v33y2018i2d10.1007_s00180-017-0757-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pairwise likelihood inference for the random effects probit model

Author

Listed:
  • T.-F. Lo

    (National Dong Hwa University)

  • P.-H. Ke

    (Academia Sinica)

  • W.-J. Tsay

    (Academia Sinica)

Abstract

This paper proposes a pairwise likelihood estimator based on an analytic approximation method for the random effects probit model. It is widely known that the standard approach for the random effects probit model relies on numerical integration and that its likelihood function does not have a closed form. When the number of time periods or the serial correlation across periods is large, the resulting estimator is likely to become biased. This study derives an analytic approximation for the likelihood function of one pair of time periods without relying on typical numerical-integral procedures. We then apply this formula in a pairwise likelihood estimation procedure to derive our estimator, which is obtained as the product of the analytic approximation of the likelihood function for all possible pairs of time periods. A simulation study is conducted for the comparison of our proposed estimator with the estimators for the pooled probit model and Gaussian quadrature procedure. The evidence shows that our proposed estimator enjoys desirable asymptotic properties. In addition, compared to the estimator based on the Gaussian quadrature procedure, our proposed estimator exhibits comparable performances in all the configurations considered in the simulation study and shows superiority for the cases of a large number of time periods and high serial correlation across periods. We apply our proposed estimator to British Household Panel Survey data so as to characterize the trend of working probabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • T.-F. Lo & P.-H. Ke & W.-J. Tsay, 2018. "Pairwise likelihood inference for the random effects probit model," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 837-861, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:33:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s00180-017-0757-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-017-0757-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-017-0757-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-017-0757-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Lung-fei, 2000. "A numerically stable quadrature procedure for the one-factor random-component discrete choice model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 117-129, March.
    2. Kuk, Anthony Y. C. & Nott, David J., 2000. "A pairwise likelihood approach to analyzing correlated binary data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 329-335, May.
    3. Wen-Jen Tsay & Cliff Huang & Tsu-Tan Fu & I.-Lin Ho, 2013. "A simple closed-form approximation for the cumulative distribution function of the composite error of stochastic frontier models," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 259-269, June.
    4. Guilkey, David K. & Murphy, James L., 1993. "Estimation and testing in the random effects probit model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 301-317, October.
    5. Borjas, George J. & Sueyoshi, Glenn T., 1994. "A two-stage estimator for probit models with structural group effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-2), pages 165-182.
    6. James J. Heckman & Robert J. Willis, 1976. "Estimation of a Stochastic Model of Reproduction: An Econometric Approach," NBER Chapters, in: Household Production and Consumption, pages 99-146, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Butler, J S & Moffitt, Robert, 1982. "A Computationally Efficient Quadrature Procedure for the One-Factor Multinomial Probit Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(3), pages 761-764, May.
    8. D. R. Cox, 2004. "A note on pseudolikelihood constructed from marginal densities," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(3), pages 729-737, September.
    9. Cristiano Varin & Paolo Vidoni, 2009. "Pairwise Likelihood Inference for General State Space Models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1-3), pages 170-185.
    10. Kanti V. Mardia & John T. Kent & Gareth Hughes & Charles C. Taylor, 2009. "Maximum likelihood estimation using composite likelihoods for closed exponential families," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(4), pages 975-982.
    11. Booth, Alison L & Jenkins, Stephen P & Serrano, Carlos Garcia, 1999. "New Men and New Women? A Comparison of Paid Work Propensities from a Panel Data Perspective," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 61(2), pages 167-197, May.
    12. Aigner, Dennis & Lovell, C. A. Knox & Schmidt, Peter, 1977. "Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 21-37, July.
    13. Renard, Didier & Molenberghs, Geert & Geys, Helena, 2004. "A pairwise likelihood approach to estimation in multilevel probit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 649-667, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhat, Chandra R., 2011. "The maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of multinomial probit-based unordered response choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 923-939, August.
    2. Paleti, Rajesh & Bhat, Chandra R., 2013. "The composite marginal likelihood (CML) estimation of panel ordered-response models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 24-43.
    3. Tatiyana V. Apanasovich & David Ruppert & Joanne R. Lupton & Natasa Popovic & Nancy D. Turner & Robert S. Chapkin & Raymond J. Carroll, 2008. "Aberrant Crypt Foci and Semiparametric Modeling of Correlated Binary Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 490-500, June.
    4. M.-L. Feddag, 2016. "Pairwise likelihood estimation for the normal ogive model with binary data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 100(2), pages 223-237, April.
    5. Gustavo Angeles & David K. Guilkey & Thomas A. Mroz, 2005. "The Impact of Community-Level Variables on Individual-Level Outcomes," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 34(1), pages 76-121, August.
    6. Partha Deb & Furio Rosati, 2002. "Determinants of Child Labor and School Attendance: The Role of Household Unobservables," Economics Working Paper Archive at Hunter College 02/9, Hunter College Department of Economics.
    7. Carling, Kenneth & Rönnegård, Lars & Roszbach, Kasper, 2004. "Is Firm Interdependence within Industries Important for Portfolio Credit Risk?," Working Paper Series 168, Sveriges Riksbank (Central Bank of Sweden).
    8. Lundin, Douglas, 2000. "Moral hazard in physician prescription behavior," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 639-662, September.
    9. Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia & Skrondal, Anders & Pickles, Andrew, 2005. "Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 301-323, October.
    10. Joe, Harry & Lee, Youngjo, 2009. "On weighting of bivariate margins in pairwise likelihood," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(4), pages 670-685, April.
    11. Varin, Cristiano & Host, Gudmund & Skare, Oivind, 2005. "Pairwise likelihood inference in spatial generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 1173-1191, June.
    12. Hanemann, W. Michael & Kanninen, Barbara, 1996. "The Statistical Analysis Of Discrete-Response Cv Data," CUDARE Working Papers 25022, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    13. Feddag, M.-L. & Bacci, S., 2009. "Pairwise likelihood for the longitudinal mixed Rasch model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1027-1037, February.
    14. Cristiano Varin, 2008. "On composite marginal likelihoods," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 92(1), pages 1-28, February.
    15. Carling, Kenneth & Alam, Moudud, 2007. "Computationally feasible estimation of the covariance structure in Generalized linear mixed models(GLMM)," Working Papers 2007:14, Örebro University, School of Business.
    16. Chong-Zhi Di & Karen Bandeen-Roche, 2011. "Multilevel Latent Class Models with Dirichlet Mixing Distribution," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 86-96, March.
    17. Kerem Tuzcuoglu, 2019. "Composite Likelihood Estimation of an Autoregressive Panel Probit Model with Random Effects," Staff Working Papers 19-16, Bank of Canada.
    18. Partha Deb, 2001. "A discrete random effects probit model with application to the demand for preventive care," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(5), pages 371-383, July.
    19. Laisney, François & Pohlmeier, Winfried & Staat, Matthias, 1991. "Estimation of labour supply functions using panel data: a survey," ZEW Discussion Papers 91-05, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    20. Greene, William, 2007. "Functional Form and Heterogeneity in Models for Count Data," Foundations and Trends(R) in Econometrics, now publishers, vol. 1(2), pages 113-218, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:33:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s00180-017-0757-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.