IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v232y2015i1p65-8610.1007-s10479-013-1336-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of different cut-to-length harvesting structures on the economic value of a wood procurement planning problem

Author

Listed:
  • Amira Dems
  • Louis-Martin Rousseau
  • Jean-Marc Frayret

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a mixed integer linear model for a practical multi-facility wood-procurement planning problem using a cut-to-length (CTL) bucking system. This forest management problem is difficult to solve since it integrates the forest bucking problem and the multi-facility supply planning problem. A priority-list approach was used to generate adequate bucking patterns in the Eastern Canadian context. The model provides decision support with respect to how to harvest the different cut-blocks according to the bucking priority list used, and in what quantities harvested logs should be transported to sawmills. It aims to minimize the nonlinear harvesting cost, the transportation cost, and the inventory cost and to maximize the product value (i.e., profit maximization). The harvesting cost considers the nonlinearity of the harvester productivity function, which is an important aspect of the decision-making process in forest management. The model was used to compare the current bucking scenario to two new possibilities. These scenarios allow us to investigate the gains and losses that arise from the use of different bucking aggregations. Specifically, we consider the impact on the number of different log types per block and thus on the associated harvesting cost. Moreover, we aim to better understand the cost/benefit trade-offs of a more complex decision structure in a Canadian wood-procurement context. The results of our scenario tests showed that forest bucking aggregation (the current practice) significantly reduces the company’s profit. A simple bucking disaggregation that does not increase the operational cost can improve the outcome. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Amira Dems & Louis-Martin Rousseau & Jean-Marc Frayret, 2015. "Effects of different cut-to-length harvesting structures on the economic value of a wood procurement planning problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 232(1), pages 65-86, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:232:y:2015:i:1:p:65-86:10.1007/s10479-013-1336-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-013-1336-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-013-1336-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-013-1336-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Epstein, R. & Nieto, E. & Weintraub, A. & Chevalier, P. & Gabarro, J., 1999. "A system for the design of short term harvesting strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 427-439, December.
    2. Carlsson, Dick & Ronnqvist, Mikael, 2005. "Supply chain management in forestry--case studies at Sodra Cell AB," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(3), pages 589-616, June.
    3. Chauhan, Satyaveer S. & Frayret, Jean-Marc & LeBel, Luc, 2009. "Multi-commodity supply network planning in the forest supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 688-696, July.
    4. Melo, M.T. & Nickel, S. & Saldanha-da-Gama, F., 2009. "Facility location and supply chain management - A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 401-412, July.
    5. Martell, David L. & Gunn, Eldon A. & Weintraub, Andres, 1998. "Forest management challenges for operational researchers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adejuyigbe O. Fajemisin & Laura Climent & Steven D. Prestwich, 2021. "An analytics-based heuristic decomposition of a bilevel multiple-follower cutting stock problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(3), pages 665-692, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Satyaveer Chauhan & J.-M. Frayret & Luc LeBel, 2011. "Supply network planning in the forest supply chain with bucking decisions anticipation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 93-115, October.
    2. Li, Xiaopeng, 2013. "An integrated modeling framework for design of logistics networks with expedited shipment services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 46-63.
    3. Dems, A. & Rousseau, L.M. & Frayret, J.M., 2017. "Annual timber procurement planning with bucking decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 713-720.
    4. repec:thr:techub:10010:y:2020:i:1:p:436-447 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Becker, Tristan & Lier, Stefan & Werners, Brigitte, 2019. "Value of modular production concepts in future chemical industry production networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 957-970.
    6. Venn, Tyron J. & Dorries, Jack W. & McGavin, Robert L., 2021. "A mathematical model to support investment in veneer and LVL manufacturing in subtropical eastern Australia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Hashem Omrani & Farzane Adabi & Narges Adabi, 2017. "Designing an efficient supply chain network with uncertain data: a robust optimization—data envelopment analysis approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(7), pages 816-828, July.
    8. Kai L. Ross & Sándor F. Tóth & Weikko S. Jaross, 2018. "Forest Harvest Scheduling with Endogenous Road Costs," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 260-270, June.
    9. Sauvey, Christophe & Melo, Teresa & Correia, Isabel, 2019. "Two-phase heuristics for a multi-period capacitated facility location problem with service-differentiated customers," Technical Reports on Logistics of the Saarland Business School 16, Saarland University of Applied Sciences (htw saar), Saarland Business School.
    10. Guerrero, W.J. & Prodhon, C. & Velasco, N. & Amaya, C.A., 2013. "Hybrid heuristic for the inventory location-routing problem with deterministic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 359-370.
    11. M. Fattahi & M. Mahootchi & S. M. Moattar Husseini, 2016. "Integrated strategic and tactical supply chain planning with price-sensitive demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 423-456, July.
    12. Hasani, Aliakbar & Khosrojerdi, Amirhossein, 2016. "Robust global supply chain network design under disruption and uncertainty considering resilience strategies: A parallel memetic algorithm for a real-life case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 20-52.
    13. Sophie Masson & Romain Petiot, 2012. "Territorial Attractiveness, Logistical Facilities And Sustainable Development [Attractivité territoriale, infrastructures logistiques et développement durable]," Post-Print hal-04153018, HAL.
    14. Xuejie Bai & Yankui Liu, 2016. "Robust optimization of supply chain network design in fuzzy decision system," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1131-1149, December.
    15. Longinidis, Pantelis & Georgiadis, Michael C., 2014. "Integration of sale and leaseback in the optimal design of supply chain networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 73-89.
    16. Ortiz-Astorquiza, Camilo & Contreras, Ivan & Laporte, Gilbert, 2018. "Multi-level facility location problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 791-805.
    17. Nader Naderializadeh & Kevin A. Crowe, 2020. "Formulating the integrated forest harvest-scheduling model to reduce the cost of the road-networks," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2283-2306, December.
    18. Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke A. & Meijboom, Kars, 2021. "A qualitative exploration of the wood product supply chain – investigating the possibilities and desirability of an increased demand orientation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    19. Rodolfo Mendoza-Gómez & Roger Z. Ríos-Mercado & Karla B. Valenzuela-Ocaña, 2019. "An Efficient Decision-Making Approach for the Planning of Diagnostic Services in a Segmented Healthcare System," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1631-1665, September.
    20. Mallidis, I. & Vlachos, D. & Dekker, R., 2010. "Greening Supply Chains: Impact on Cost and Design," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2010-39a, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    21. Correia, Isabel & Melo, Teresa & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2012. "Comparing classical performance measures for a multi-period, two-echelon supply chain network design problem with sizing decisions," Technical Reports on Logistics of the Saarland Business School 1, Saarland University of Applied Sciences (htw saar), Saarland Business School.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:232:y:2015:i:1:p:65-86:10.1007/s10479-013-1336-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.