IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agfoec/v10y2022i1d10.1186_s40100-022-00231-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer preferences for wild game meat: evidence from a hybrid choice model on wild boar meat in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Tommaso Fantechi

    (Università Degli Studi Di Firenze)

  • Caterina Contini

    (Università Degli Studi Di Firenze)

  • Gabriele Scozzafava

    (Università Degli Studi Di Firenze)

  • Leonardo Casini

    (Università Degli Studi Di Firenze)

Abstract

The increasing numbers of wild animals in Europe is leading, on the one hand, to growing problems stemming from their interaction with human activities. On the other, many European countries have still not developed national supply chains to market wild game. Instead, these supply chains could represent a win–win strategy in providing a sustainable alternative to production via intensive livestock farming and developing rural territories. Our aim was to understand consumer behaviour towards wild game meat. We conducted a choice experiment on wild boar meat on a sample of Italian consumers (625). The application of a hybrid model combining a structural equation model and a latent class analysis allowed us to identify the antecedents of attitude towards wild game meat and to analyse consumer choices by utilising attitude as an explanatory variable. The results provide useful suggestions to implement rural development policies and offer food for thought in the area of consumer behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Tommaso Fantechi & Caterina Contini & Gabriele Scozzafava & Leonardo Casini, 2022. "Consumer preferences for wild game meat: evidence from a hybrid choice model on wild boar meat in Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:10:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-022-00231-w
    DOI: 10.1186/s40100-022-00231-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40100-022-00231-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40100-022-00231-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dobrenova, Fanny V. & Grabner-Kräuter, Sonja & Terlutter, Ralf, 2015. "Country-of-origin (COO) effects in the promotion of functional ingredients and functional foods," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 314-321.
    2. Kim Darby & Marvin T. Batte & Stan Ernst & Brian Roe, 2008. "Decomposing Local: A Conjoint Analysis of Locally Produced Foods," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(2), pages 476-486.
    3. Balcombe, Kelvin & Bradley, Dylan & Fraser, Iain & Hussein, Mohamud, 2016. "Consumer preferences regarding country of origin for multiple meat products," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 49-62.
    4. Claudia Bazzani & Maurizio Canavari, 2013. "Alternative Agri-Food Networks and Short Food Supply Chains: a review of the literature," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 15(2), pages 11-34.
    5. Xiaoru Xie & Liman Huang & Jun (Justin) Li & Hong Zhu, 2020. "Generational Differences in Perceptions of Food Health/Risk and Attitudes toward Organic Food and Game Meat: The Case of the COVID-19 Crisis in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Amici, A. & Coletta, A. & Primi, R. & Rossi, C. M. & Viola, P., 2018. "Wild boar interaction with human activities : three years of investigations in Central Italy," 2018 Seventh AIEAA Conference, June 14-15, Conegliano, Italy 275657, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    7. Benjamin L. Campbell & Saneliso Mhlanga & Isabelle Lesschaeve, 2013. "Perception versus Reality: Canadian Consumer Views of Local and Organic," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 61(4), pages 531-558, December.
    8. Jianhua Wang & Jiaye Ge & Yuting Ma, 2018. "Urban Chinese Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Pork with Certified Labels: A Discrete Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    10. McFadden, Daniel, 1974. "The measurement of urban travel demand," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 303-328, November.
    11. Anna Gaviglio & Maria Elena Marescotti & Eugenio Demartini, 2018. "The Local Value Chain of Hunted Red Deer Meat: A Scenario Analysis Based on a Northern Italian Case Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-10, May.
    12. Grebitus, Carola & Lusk, Jayson L. & Nayga, Rodolfo M., 2013. "Explaining differences in real and hypothetical experimental auctions and choice experiments with personality," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 11-26.
    13. Ali Eldesouky & Francisco J. Mesias & Miguel Escribano, 2020. "Consumer Assessment of Sustainability Traits in Meat Production. A Choice Experiment Study in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Marescotti, Maria Elena & Caputo, Vincenzina & Demartini, Eugenio & Gaviglio, Anna, 2020. "Consumer preferences for wild game cured meat label: do attitudes towards animal welfare matter?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(4), June.
    15. Giovanna Sacchi & Vincenzina Caputo & Rodolfo M. Nayga, 2015. "Alternative Labeling Programs and Purchasing Behavior toward Organic Foods: The Case of the Participatory Guarantee Systems in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Wynne W. Chin & Abhijit Gopal & W. David Salisbury, 1997. "Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 342-367, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rose, J.M. & Borriello, A. & Pellegrini, A., 2023. "Formative versus reflective attitude measures: Extending the hybrid choice model," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin Bai & Zhanguo Zhu & Tong Zhang, 2021. "How to Improve Food Quality in the Domestic Market: The Role of “Same Line Same Standard Same Quality”—Evidence from a Consumer Choice Experiment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Bianca Polenzani & Chiara Riganelli & Andrea Marchini, 2020. "Sustainability Perception of Local Extra Virgin Olive Oil and Consumers’ Attitude: A New Italian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Chavez, Daniel E. & Palma, Marco A. & Nayga Jr., Rodolfo M., 2017. "When does real become consequential in non-hypothetical choice experiments?," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266327, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Panchalingam, Thadchaigeni & Howard, Gregory & Allen Klaiber, H. & Roe, Brian E., 2023. "Food choice behavior of adolescents under parent-child interaction in the context of US school lunch programs," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Ching‐Hua Yeh & Stefan Hirsch, 2023. "A meta‐regression analysis on the willingness‐to‐pay for country‐of‐origin labelling," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 719-743, September.
    6. Kurtuluş, Ercan & Çetin, İsmail Bilge, 2020. "Analysis of modal shift potential towards intermodal transportation in short-distance inland container transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 24-37.
    7. Chenyi He & Ruifeng Liu & Zhifeng Gao & Xin Zhao & Charles A. Sims & Rodolfo M. Nayga, 2021. "Does local label bias consumer taste buds and preference? Evidence of a strawberry sensory experiment," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 550-568, July.
    8. Martina Vecchi & Edward C. Jaenicke & Claudia Schmidt, 2022. "Local food in times of crisis: The impact of COVID‐19 and two reinforcing primes," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 850-873, October.
    9. Ali Eldesouky & Francisco J. Mesias & Miguel Escribano, 2020. "Consumer Assessment of Sustainability Traits in Meat Production. A Choice Experiment Study in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Caterina Contini & Fabio Boncinelli & Giovanna Piracci & Gabriele Scozzafava & Leonardo Casini, 2023. "Can blockchain technology strengthen consumer preferences for credence attributes?," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Okello, Afrika Onguko & Otieno, David Jakinda & Nzuma, Jonathan Makau & Kidoido, Michael Mukembo & Tanga, Chrysantus Mbi, 2022. "Smallholder farmers’ willingness to pay for commercial insect-based chicken feed in Kenya," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 26(1), October.
    12. Yang, Shang-Ho & Woods, Timothy, 2014. "The Divergence of Defining Local Food – Consumer Co-op versus Conventional Grocery Shoppers," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170480, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Jasper Grashuis & Alexandre Magnier, 2018. "Product differentiation by marketing and processing cooperatives: A choice experiment with cheese and cereal products," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 813-830, October.
    14. Demartini, Eugenio & Vecchiato, Daniel & Finos, Livio & Mattavelli, Simone & Gaviglio, Anna, 2022. "Would you buy vegan meatballs? The policy issues around vegan and meat-sounding labelling of plant-based meat alternatives," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    15. Paul Hindley & O. Ashton Morgan, 2023. "The Role of Respondent Certainty and Attribute Non-Attendance on the Willingness to Pay for the Attributes of Recyclable Aluminum Bottled Water," Working Papers 23-06, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    16. Eugenio DEMARTINI & Anna GAVIGLIO & Alberto PIRANI, 2017. "Farmers' motivation and perceived effects of participating in short food supply chains: evidence from a North Italian survey," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(5), pages 204-216.
    17. Diane Smith & Weiwei Wang & Lisa Chase & Hans Estrin & Julia Van Soelen Kim, 2019. "Perspectives from the Field: Adaptions in CSA Models in Response to Changing Times in the U.S," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Kar H. Lim & Wuyang Hu, 2016. "How Local Is Local? A Reflection on Canadian Local Food Labeling Policy from Consumer Preference," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 64(1), pages 71-88, March.
    19. Vecchi, Martina & Jaenicke, Edward C., 2021. "Local food in times of crisis: the impact of Covid-19 and two reinforcing primes," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313958, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Chenkuo Pai & Sangguk Kang & Yumeng Liu & Yingchuan Zheng, 2021. "An Examination of Revisit Intention Based on Perceived Smart Tourism Technology Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:10:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-022-00231-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.