IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/gosnar/y2015i3p5-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kartele w trzech perspektywach: neoklasycznej, behawioralnej oraz etycznej

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Karbowski

Abstract

Celem artykułu jest krytyka podejścia neoklasycznego w studiach nad kartelami oraz ukazanie, w jaki sposób perspektywy behawioralna i etyczna rozszerzają a także uzupełniają optykę neoklasyczną. Główny nurt badań ekonomicznych nad problematyką karteli przyjmuje perspektywę neoklasyczną. Z tej tradycji badawczej wyrasta teoria optymalnego zniechęcania, która stanowi podstawę dla obecnej polityki wobec karteli w rozwiniętych krajach świata. Teoria optymalnego zniechęcania stanowi tu punkt wyjścia dla rozważań teoretycznych. Skonfrontowana jest ona następnie z doniesieniami ekonomistów behawioralnych oraz sądami etycznymi na temat funkcjonowania karteli. Analiza behawioralna pozwala wskazać odstępstwa od zachowań przedsiębiorstw przewidywanych na podstawie teorii optymalnego zniechęcania (zakładającej pełną racjonalność, doskonały egoizm oraz całkowitą samokontrolę decydentów). Te behawioralne odstępstwa wynikają z przyczyn wewnętrznych (dyspozycji decydentów) lub czynników środowiskowych. Analiza etyczna rozszerza optykę neoklasyczną. Rozważania aksjologiczne pozwalają pokazać, że działania kartelowe mają nie tylko wymiar czysto ekonomiczny, ale łamią one normy społeczne i mogą zostać uznane na moralnie złe jako przykłady kradzieży oraz oszustwa.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Karbowski, 2015. "Kartele w trzech perspektywach: neoklasycznej, behawioralnej oraz etycznej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 5-26.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2015:i:3:p:5-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.journalssystem.com/gna/pdf-100810-33096
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steinar Holden, 2012. "Implications of insights from behavioral economics for macroeconomic models," IMK Working Paper 99-2012, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    2. Christoph Engel, 2008. "The Behaviour of Corporate Actors. A Survey of the Empirical Literature," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2008_23, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    3. Liefmann, Robert, 1932. "Cartels, Concerns and Trusts," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number liefmann1932.
    4. Gowdy, John M., 2004. "Altruism, evolution, and welfare economics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 69-73, January.
    5. Prokop, Jacek, 2012. "Praktyka Zwalczania Karteli W Unii Europejskiej [The Practice Of Cartel Elimination In The European Union]," MPRA Paper 67126, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. George Loewenstein & Drazen Prelec, 1992. "Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 107(2), pages 573-597.
    7. Andreas Stephan, 2007. "Survey of Public Attitudes to Price-Fixing and Cartel Enforcement in Britain," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2007-12, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    8. Francesco Parisi & Charles K. Rowley (ed.), 2005. "The Origins of Law and Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2695.
    9. Sunstein, Cass R, 1999. "Behavioral Law and Economics: A Progress Report," American Law and Economics Review, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(1-2), pages 115-157, Fall.
    10. Jonathan Baron & Rajeev Gowda & Howard Kunreuther, 1993. "Attitudes Toward Managing Hazardous Waste: What Should Be Cleaned Up and Who Should Pay for It?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 183-192, April.
    11. Bebchuk, Lucian Arye & Kaplow, Louis, 1993. "Optimal sanctions and differences in individuals' likelihood of avoiding detection," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 217-224, June.
    12. Colin F. Camerer & Richard H. Thaler, 1995. "Anomalies: Ultimatums, Dictators and Manners," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 209-219, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karbowski, Adam & Prokop, Jacek, 2018. "Kartele i patenty a nakłady badawczo-rozwojowe przedsiębiorstw [Cartels and patents, and R&D expenditures of companies]," MPRA Paper 90181, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2018.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karbowski, Adam, 2011. "Sądy postulatywne w ekonomii głównego nurtu [Postulative Claims in Mainstream Economics]," MPRA Paper 69603, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Leigh Anderson & Kostas G. Stamoulis, 2006. "Applying Behavioural Economics to International Development Policy," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-24, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Karbowski, Adam, 2016. "Discussion on the Social Rate of Discount: from Sen to Behavioural Economics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 46-60.
    4. Gintis, Herbert, 2000. "Beyond Homo economicus: evidence from experimental economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 311-322, December.
    5. Katharina Dowling & Daniel Guhl & Daniel Klapper & Martin Spann & Lucas Stich & Narine Yegoryan, 2020. "Behavioral biases in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 449-477, May.
    6. Osiński, Jerzy & Karbowski, Adam, 2015. "Dyskontowanie nagród pieniężnych w czasie i w przestrzeni społecznej: studium eksperymentalne [Discounting of monetary rewards in time and in social space: experimental study]," MPRA Paper 69591, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Janvier D. Nkurunziza, 2005. "Reputation and Credit without Collateral in Africa`s Formal Banking," Economics Series Working Papers WPS/2005-02, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    8. Lillemo, Shuling Chen, 2014. "Measuring the effect of procrastination and environmental awareness on households' energy-saving behaviours: An empirical approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 249-256.
    9. Caroline Flammer & Michael W. Toffel & Kala Viswanathan, 2021. "Shareholder activism and firms' voluntary disclosure of climate change risks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(10), pages 1850-1879, October.
    10. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:3:p:709-728 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Thomas Dohmen & Armin Falk & David Huffman & Uwe Sunde, 2009. "Homo Reciprocans: Survey Evidence on Behavioural Outcomes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(536), pages 592-612, March.
    12. Stephen L. Cheung & Agnieszka Tymula & Xueting Wang, 2022. "Present bias for monetary and dietary rewards," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1202-1233, September.
    13. Antonides, Gerrit & Kroft, Maaike, 2005. "Fairness judgments in household decision making," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 902-913, December.
    14. Yu-Jui Huang & Adrien Nguyen-Huu, 2018. "Time-consistent stopping under decreasing impatience," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 69-95, January.
    15. Marieka M. Klawitter & C. Leigh Anderson & Mary Kay Gugerty, 2013. "Savings And Personal Discount Rates In A Matched Savings Program For Low-Income Families," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 31(3), pages 468-485, July.
    16. Alexander L. Brown & Zhikang Eric Chua & Colin F. Camerer, 2009. "Learning and Visceral Temptation in Dynamic Saving Experiments," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 124(1), pages 197-231.
    17. Mattauch, Linus & Hepburn, Cameron & Stern, Nicholas, 2018. "Pigou pushes preferences: decarbonisation and endogenous values," INET Oxford Working Papers 2018-16, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    18. Jawwad Noor, 2005. "Choice and Normative Preference," Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series WP2005-039, Boston University - Department of Economics.
    19. Stefania Albanesi & Claudia Olivetti, 2006. "Gender roles and technological progress," 2006 Meeting Papers 411, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    20. Uri Ben-Zion & Jan Pieter Krahnen & TAL SHAVIT, 2007. "Subjective Evaluation Of Delayed Risky Outcomes: An Experimental Approach," Working Papers 0709, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    21. Kimbrough, E.O. & Vostroknutov, A., 2012. "Rules, rule-following and cooperation," Research Memorandum 053, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    kartele; ekonomia neoklasyczna; ekonomia behawioralna; etyka gospodarcza;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • B13 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Wicksellian)
    • B21 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Microeconomics
    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2015:i:3:p:5-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Grzegorz Konat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.