IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v51y2014i12p2685-2702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Location-demand-based residential floor area ratio distribution method

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Hsin Tsai

Abstract

Urban density policy, usually implemented through a floor area ratio (FAR) plan, may become increasingly important in achieving such goals as environmental sustainability or acting as an incentive to promote transit-orientated development. Nonetheless there seems a lack of guidance on FAR distribution. In order to provide FAR distribution guidelines, in particular with the goal of incorporating sustainability and market demand, this paper develops a step-by-step, quantitative residential FAR distribution alternative based on both the advantages of the location and the market demand for the locations. It consists of two major steps: floor area generation and FAR distribution; the latter being the focus of this paper. The methods applied involve the measurement of accessibility within geographic information systems and the hedonic price model. A simulation analysis of this FAR distribution method is conducted to develop a FAR plan for a plan area, and is then applied to demonstrate how the FAR plan can be modified if mass rapid transit stations are introduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Hsin Tsai, 2014. "Location-demand-based residential floor area ratio distribution method," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(12), pages 2685-2702, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:51:y:2014:i:12:p:2685-2702
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098013506048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098013506048
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098013506048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bertaud, Alain & Brueckner, Jan K., 2005. "Analyzing building-height restrictions: predicted impacts and welfare costs," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 109-125, March.
    2. Fujita,Masahisa, 1991. "Urban Economic Theory," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521396455, January.
    3. Xiaolu Gao & Yasushi Asami & Wataru Katsumata, 2006. "Evaluating Land-Use Restrictions concerning the Floor Area Ratio of Lots," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(4), pages 515-532, August.
    4. Tatsuhito Kono & Takayuki Kaneko & Hisa Morisugi, 2010. "Necessity of minimum floor area ratio regulation: a second-best policy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 44(3), pages 523-539, June.
    5. Erick Guerra & Robert Cervero, 2011. "Cost of a Ride," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(3), pages 267-290.
    6. Cervero, Robert & Duncan, Michael, 2002. "Residential Self Selection and Rail Commuting: A Nested Logit Analysis," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1wg020cd, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan K. Brueckner & Shihe Fu & Yizhen Gu & Junfu Zhang, 2017. "Measuring the Stringency of Land Use Regulation: The Case of China's Building Height Limits," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 99(4), pages 663-677, July.
    2. Takeda, Yoshihiro & Kono, Tatsuhito & Zhang, Yang, 2019. "Welfare effects of floor area ratio regulation on landowners and residents with different levels of income," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    3. Tikoudis, Ioannis & Farrow, Katherine & Mebiame, Rose Mba & Oueslati, Walid, 2022. "Beyond average population density: Measuring sprawl with density-allocation indicators," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Kono, Tatsuhito & Joshi, Kirti Kusum, 2012. "A new interpretation on the optimal density regulations: Closed and open city," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 223-234.
    5. Lehe, Lewis, 2014. "Inclusionary Zoning in a Monocentric City," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6qp1j5bj, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Qing Lu & Jing Ning & Hong You & Liyan Xu, 2023. "Urban Intensity in Theory and Practice: Empirical Determining Mechanism of Floor Area Ratio and Its Deviation from the Classic Location Theories in Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Nicolas Coulombel, 2008. "Monocentric analysis of restricting the budget share of housing alone or with transportation," Working Papers hal-00319084, HAL.
    8. Satyajit Chatterjee & Burcu Eyigungor, 2017. "A Tractable City Model For Aggregative Analysis," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 58(1), pages 127-155, February.
    9. Cai, Hongbin & Wang, Zhi & Zhang, Qinghua, 2017. "To build above the limit? Implementation of land use regulations in urban China," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 223-233.
    10. Tikoudis, Ioannis & Verhoef, Erik T. & van Ommeren, Jos N., 2018. "Second-best urban tolls in a monocentric city with housing market regulations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 342-359.
    11. Takayama, Yuki & Kuwahara, Masao, 2017. "Bottleneck congestion and residential location of heterogeneous commuters," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 65-79.
    12. Yidi Wang & Ying Fan & Zan Yang, 2022. "Challenges, Experience, and Prospects of Urban Renewal in High-Density Cities: A Review for Hong Kong," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Tatsuhito Kono & Hiroya Kawaguchi, 2017. "Cordon Pricing and Land‐Use Regulation," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 119(2), pages 405-434, April.
    14. Hans R. A. Koster & Piet Rietveld & Jos N. van Ommerren, 2011. "Is the Sky the Limit? An Analysis of High-Rise Office Buildings," SERC Discussion Papers 0086, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    15. Satyajit Chatterjee & Burcu Eyigungor, 2013. "Do supply restrictions raise the value of urban land? The (neglected) role of production externalities," Working Papers 13-37, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    16. Rainald Borck & Jan K. Brueckner, 2018. "Optimal Energy Taxation in Cities," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(2), pages 481-516.
    17. Paolo Avner & Vincent Viguié & Bramka Arga Jafino & Stephane Hallegatte, 2022. "Flood Protection and Land Value Creation – Not all Resilience Investments Are Created Equal," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 417-449, November.
    18. Kristof Dascher, 2013. "Climate Change and Urban Contours: Why Countries with Denser City Centers Fight Climate Change Harder," ERSA conference papers ersa13p744, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Coulombel, Nicolas, 2018. "Why housing and transport costs should always be considered together: A monocentric analysis of prudential measures in housing access," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 89-105.
    20. Proque, Andressa Lemes & dos Santos, Gervásio Ferreira & Betarelli Junior, Admir Antonio & Larson, William D., 2020. "Effects of land use and transportation policies on the spatial distribution of urban energy consumption in Brazil," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:51:y:2014:i:12:p:2685-2702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.