IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v29y1992i7p1043-1069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Form Follows Function: Reformulating Urban Population Density Functions

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Batty

    (National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, State University of New York at Buffalo, 301F Wilkeson Quad, Buffalo, NY 14261, USA)

  • Kwang Sik Kim

    (Department of Public Administration, Sung Kyun Kwan University, 53, 3-KA, Myungryun-dong, Chongro-ku, Seoul 110-745, Korea)

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that the most appropriate form for urban population density models is the inverse power function, contrary to conventional practice, which is largely based upon the negative exponential. We first show that the inverse power function has several theoretical properties which have hitherto gone unremarked in the literature. Our main argument, however, is based on the notion that a density function should describe the extent to which the space available for urban development is filled. To this end, we introduce ideas from urban allometry and fractal geometry to demonstrate that the inverse power model is the only function which embodies the fractal property of self-similarity which we consider to be a basic characteristic of urban form and density. In short, we show that the distance parameter a of the inverse power model is a measure of the extent to which space is filled, and that its value is determined by the basic relation D +α=2 where D is the fractal dimension of the city in question. We then test this model using four data sets which measure the density and morphology of the city of Seoul. Using a variety of estimation methods such as loglinear regression, dimensional approximation and entropy-maximising, we estimate dimension and density parameters for 136 variants of the function and its data sets. From these estimates, 125 are within the values hypothesised and this suggests fairly conclusively that the value of the density parameter a for the inverse power function should be within the range 0-1 and probably between 0.2 and 0.5. Many related questions are raised by this analysis which will form the subject of future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Batty & Kwang Sik Kim, 1992. "Form Follows Function: Reformulating Urban Population Density Functions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 29(7), pages 1043-1069, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:29:y:1992:i:7:p:1043-1069
    DOI: 10.1080/00420989220081041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420989220081041
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420989220081041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R.H. Best & A.R. Jones & A.W. Rogers, 1974. "The Density-size Rule," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 201-208, June.
    2. Herbert K. Weiss, 1961. "The Distribution of Urban Population and an Application to a Servicing Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(6), pages 860-874, December.
    3. A. Stewart Fotheringham & Michael Batty & Paul A. Longley, 1989. "Diffusion‐Limited Aggregation And The Fractal Nature Of Urban Growth," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(1), pages 55-69, January.
    4. Beckmann, Martin J., 1969. "On the distribution of urban rent and residential density," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 60-67, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. António Dinis F. Santos & Duarte Valério & J. A. Tenreiro Machado & António M. Lopes, 2019. "A fractional perspective to the modelling of Lisbon’s public transportation network," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1893-1913, October.
    2. Daniel Griffith & David Wong, 2007. "Modeling population density across major US cities: a polycentric spatial regression approach," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 53-75, April.
    3. Mario Coccia & Barry Bozeman, 2016. "Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1065-1084, September.
    4. Isabelle Thomas & Pierre Frankhauser & Marie‐Laurence De Keersmaecker, 2007. "Fractal dimension versus density of built‐up surfaces in the periphery of Brussels," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(2), pages 287-308, June.
    5. Marjo Kasanko & Jose I. Barredo & Carlo Lavalle & Valentina Sagris, 2005. "Towards urban un-sustainability in Europe? An indicator-based analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa05p149, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Ondřej Slach & Vojtěch Bosák & Luděk Krtička & Alexandr Nováček & Petr Rumpel, 2019. "Urban Shrinkage and Sustainability: Assessing the Nexus between Population Density, Urban Structures and Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Jaume Benseny & Juuso Toyli & Heikki Hammainen & Andr'es Arcia-Moret, 2019. "The mitigating role of regulation on the concentric patterns of broadband diffusion. The case of Finland," Papers 1905.03002, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    8. Luca Salvati, 2019. "Examining urban functions along a metropolitan gradient: a geographically weighted regression tells you more," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 19-40, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A.R. Jones, 1975. "Density-size Rule, a further Note," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 12(2), pages 225-228, June.
    2. Deman, S., 2000. "The real estate takeover: Application of Grossman and Hart theory," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 175-195.
    3. John Parr, 2015. "The city and the region as contrasts in spatial organization," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 797-817, May.
    4. Dmitry Pokrovsky & Kristian Behrens, 2014. "Unequal cities: Self-selection, matching, and the distribution of income," ERSA conference papers ersa14p997, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M., 2008. "If Alonso was Right: Residual Land Price, Accessibility and Urban Attraction," MPRA Paper 11707, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Peng, Ya-Ting & Li, Zhi-Chun & Choi, Keechoo, 2017. "Transit-oriented development in an urban rail transportation corridor," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 269-290.
    7. Li, Zhi-Chun & Guo, Qian-Wen & Lam, William H.K. & Wong, S.C., 2015. "Transit technology investment and selection under urban population volatility: A real option perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 318-340.
    8. Schmidheiny, Kurt, 2006. "Income segregation and local progressive taxation: Empirical evidence from Switzerland," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 429-458, February.
    9. John Craig & John Haskey, 1978. "The Relationships Between the Population, Area, and Density of Urban Areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 15(1), pages 101-107, February.
    10. Jian Feng & Yanguang Chen, 2021. "Modeling Urban Growth and Socio-Spatial Dynamics of Hangzhou, China: 1964–2010," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Chen, Yanguang, 2009. "Analogies between urban hierarchies and river networks: Fractals, symmetry, and self-organized criticality," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 1766-1778.
    12. Berliant, Marcus & Dunz, Karl, 2004. "A foundation of location theory: existence of equilibrium, the welfare theorems, and core," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 593-618, August.
    13. Zoltan J. Acs & Attila Varga, 2008. "Geography, Endogenous Growth, and Innovation," Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, chapter 12, pages 152-168, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. John Parr, 2012. "Spatial-structure differences between urban and regional systems," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 49(2), pages 293-303, October.
    15. Natalia Presman & Arie Arnon, 2006. "Commuting patterns in Israel 1991-2004," Bank of Israel Working Papers 2006.04, Bank of Israel.
    16. Zhi-Chun Li & Li Cheng & André de Palma, 2023. "Ring road investment, cordon tolling, and urban spatial structure: Formulation and a case study," THEMA Working Papers 2023-07, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    17. John Yinger, 2009. "Hedonic Markets and Explicit Demands: Bid-Function Envelopes for Public Services, Neighborhood Amenities, and Commuting Costs," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 114, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University.
    18. Wei-Bin Zhang, 2021. "Growth With Residential Density, Land Rent And Land Value," Economia Coyuntural,Revista de temas de perspectivas y coyuntura, Instituto de Investigaciones Economicas y Sociales 'Jose Ortiz Mercado' (IIES-JOM), Facultad de Ciencias Economicas, Administrativas y Financieras, Universidad Autonoma Gabriel Rene Moreno, vol. 6(1), pages 79-116.
    19. Chen, Yanguang & Lin, Jingyi, 2009. "Modeling the self-affine structure and optimization conditions of city systems using the idea from fractals," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 615-629.
    20. Liotta, Charlotte & Viguié, Vincent & Lepetit, Quentin, 2022. "Testing the monocentric standard urban model in a global sample of cities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:29:y:1992:i:7:p:1043-1069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.