IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v27y2022i3p587-603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Young People’s Perspectives on the Value and Meaning of Art during the Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Rizzo

    (UNICEF, Jordan)

  • Ellie Knox

    (Young Citizen, UK)

  • Naqi Azizi

    (Young Citizen, UK)

  • Isra Sulevani

    (Young Citizen, UK)

  • Charmaine Chia

    (Young Citizen, Singapore)

  • Marie Leo

    (Young Citizen, Singapore)

  • Micol Spina

    (Young Citizen, Italy)

  • Barry Percy-Smith

    (University of Huddersfield, UK)

  • Chermaine Tay

    (ACTED, Yemen)

  • Leanne Monchuk

    (University of Huddersfield, UK)

  • Laurie Day

    (Ecorys UK Ltd., UK)

Abstract

This contribution draws on the voices and reflections from young people as co-researchers in the Growing-Up Under Covid-19 project – a longitudinal ethnographic action research project to document, share, and respond to impacts of the pandemic on different spheres of young people’s lives. The research was conducted entirely online over 18 months in seven countries and has involved youth-led approaches to research, including video diaries and the use of artefacts and visual material to convey their experiences and support reflection and dialogue across research groups and with external stakeholders. In this contribution, the young co-researchers reflect on their rationale for using different visual media and why this was important for them. They also reflect on the significance of the representations in the visual images and how these images communicate how young people’s understanding of COVID and its impact on young people has changed (or given new meaning to) and how this in turn has given rise to particular responses and opportunities for young people. The article draws on examples of different visual forms selected by young people in Singapore, Italy, Lebanon, and the UK nations, including video, drawing, photography, and crafts. These different media and links to videos were included in the accompanying document. The contribution explores the different narratives and meanings behind the visuals, using the words of young people themselves, interspersed with narration from the adult researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Rizzo & Ellie Knox & Naqi Azizi & Isra Sulevani & Charmaine Chia & Marie Leo & Micol Spina & Barry Percy-Smith & Chermaine Tay & Leanne Monchuk & Laurie Day, 2022. "Young People’s Perspectives on the Value and Meaning of Art during the Pandemic," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(3), pages 587-603, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:27:y:2022:i:3:p:587-603
    DOI: 10.1177/13607804221105282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13607804221105282
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13607804221105282?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan D. Meyer, 1991. "Visual Data in Organizational Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(2), pages 218-236, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helen Lomax & Kate Smith & Barry Percy-Smith, 2022. "Rethinking Visual Arts–Based Methods of Knowledge Generation and Exchange in and beyond the Pandemic," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(3), pages 541-549, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Li-Ching, 2012. "Screening alternatives graphically by an extended case-based distance approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 96-103, January.
    2. Arie Y. Lewin & Silvia Massini & Carine Peeters, 2011. "Microfoundations of Internal and External Absorptive Capacity Routines," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 81-98, February.
    3. Ma, Li-Ching, 2010. "Visualizing preferences on spheres for group decisions based on multiplicative preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 176-184, May.
    4. Yves Fassin, 2008. "Imperfections and Shortcomings of the Stakeholder Model’s Graphical Representation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(4), pages 879-888, July.
    5. Comi, Alice & Eppler, Martin J., 2014. "Diagnosing capabilities in family firms: An overview of visual research methods and suggestions for future applications," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 41-51.
    6. Aaltola, Pasi & Manninen, Ari, 2021. "Drawing the premises for personalized learning: Illustrations of management and accounting," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    7. A. Parmentier, 2010. "Cartographie du journal personnel : Un outil méthodologique réflectif pour la recherche-intervention," Post-Print halshs-00534839, HAL.
    8. Sonia Tello-Rozas & Marlei Pozzebon & Chantale Mailhot, 2015. "Uncovering Micro-Practices and Pathways of Engagement That Scale Up Social-Driven Collaborations: A Practice View of Power," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(8), pages 1064-1096, December.
    9. Karin Eberhard, 2023. "The effects of visualization on judgment and decision-making: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 167-214, February.
    10. Helal Zaabi & Hamdi Bashir, 2020. "Modeling and analyzing project interdependencies in project portfolios using an integrated social network analysis-fuzzy TOPSIS MICMAC approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1083-1106, December.
    11. André Luis Silva & Márcia de Freitas Duarte & Flávia Plutarco, 2020. "Organizational Rare Events: Theory and Research Practice," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(4), pages 635-659, October.
    12. Y. Fassin, 2008. "The Stakeholder Model Refined," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/529, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    13. Clarke, Jean & Holt, Robin, 2017. "Imagery of ad-venture: Understanding entrepreneurial identity through metaphor and drawing," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 476-497.
    14. Eivor Oborn & Michael Barrett & Wanda Orlikowski & Anna Kim, 2019. "Trajectory Dynamics in Innovation: Developing and Transforming a Mobile Money Service Across Time and Place," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 1097-1123, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:27:y:2022:i:3:p:587-603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.