IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/padigm/v21y2017i1p75-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spousal Attitude Towards Exerting Conflict Resolution Strategies in Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Shivendra Singh
  • Atul Dhyani

Abstract

Family is one entity that has complex variables underplaying the consumption decisions, and marketers must understand how couples behave in concert to resolve conflict across major decisions. In this study, the family aspects are investigated to shed more light on spouse attitude towards family decision-making for selection of car and school/college for their ward and assess the impact of attitudinal factor on decision satisfaction. The drop-off/pick-up method was used to collect the data from Northern India. The result reveals that spousal attitude is formed by marital power, assertiveness, subtle manipulation, love, bargaining and being submissive. Results of multiple regression analysis show that subtle manipulation is most and marital power has a negative impact on spouses’ decision satisfaction. Thus, when targeting a family for a significant trades assay, the salesperson should focus on both husband and wife and stimulate a conversation between them to appeal to their conjoint kinship.

Suggested Citation

  • Shivendra Singh & Atul Dhyani, 2017. "Spousal Attitude Towards Exerting Conflict Resolution Strategies in Decision Making," Paradigm, , vol. 21(1), pages 75-90, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:21:y:2017:i:1:p:75-90
    DOI: 10.1177/0971890717700530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971890717700530
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971890717700530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davis, Harry L, 1976. "Decision Making within the Household," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(4), pages 241-260, March.
    2. Spiro, Rosann L, 1983. "Persuasion in Family Decision-Making," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(4), pages 393-402, March.
    3. Green, Robert T, et al, 1983. "Societal Development and Family Purchasing Roles: A Cross-National Study," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(4), pages 436-442, March.
    4. Kirchler, Erich, 1990. "Spouses' influence strategies in purchase decisions as dependent on conflict type and relationship characteristics," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 101-118, March.
    5. Kim, Chankon & Lee, Hanjoon, 1996. "A taxonomy of couples based on influence strategies: The case of home purchase," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 157-168, June.
    6. Park, C Whan, 1982. "Joint Decisions in Home Purchasing: A Muddling-Through Process," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 151-162, September.
    7. Corfman, Kim P & Lehmann, Donald R, 1987. "Models of Cooperative Group Decision-Making and Relative Influence: An Experimental Investigation of Family Purchase Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavleen Kaur & Raghbir Singh, 2005. "Conflict Resolution in Urban and Rural Families: A Factor Analytical Approach," Vision, , vol. 9(1), pages 59-67, January.
    2. Kirchler, Erich, 1995. "Studying economic decisions within private households: A critical review and design for a "couple experiences diary"," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 393-419, September.
    3. Ximena Garcia-Rada & Lalin Anik & Dan Ariely, 2019. "Consuming together (versus separately) makes the heart grow fonder," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 27-43, March.
    4. Landisoa Rabeson & Corina Paraschiv & Laurent Bertrandias & Régis Chenavaz, 2022. "Couple Ethical Purchase Behavior and Joint Decision Making: Understanding the Interaction Process and the Dynamics of Influence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Tripathi Sanjeev & Sinha, Piyush Kumar & Sinha, Piyush Kumar, 2006. "Family and Store Choice - A Conceptual Framework," IIMA Working Papers WP2006-11-03, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    6. Anna Scott & Caroline Oates & William Young, 2015. "A Conceptual Framework of the Adoption and Practice of Environmental Actions in Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-26, May.
    7. Kim, Chankon & Lee, Hanjoon, 1996. "A taxonomy of couples based on influence strategies: The case of home purchase," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 157-168, June.
    8. Yan, Qianqian & Feng, Tao & Timmermans, Harry, 2023. "A model of household shared parking decisions incorporating equity-seeking household dynamics and leadership personality traits," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    9. Kozak, Metin, 2010. "Holiday taking decisions – The role of spouses," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 489-494.
    10. Kaefer, Frederick & Heilman, Carrie M. & Ramenofsky, Samuel D., 2012. "The impact of a wife's budgetary and romantic attitudes towards luxury goods on their self-purchases and purchases made for them by their husbands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 297-303.
    11. Krishna Das Gupta, 2010. "Dynamics of Marital Roles in Consumer Decision Making: A Study of Indian Households," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 35(2), pages 209-225, May.
    12. Cross, Samantha N.N. & Gilly, Mary C., 2014. "Consumption compromises: Negotiation and unification within contemporary families," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 449-456.
    13. Singh, Pallavi & Sahadev, Sunil & Oates, Caroline J. & Alevizou, Panayiota, 2020. "Pro-environmental behavior in families: A reverse socialization perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 110-121.
    14. Zhang, Junyi & Fujiwara, Akimasa, 2006. "Representing household time allocation behavior by endogenously incorporating diverse intra-household interactions: A case study in the context of elderly couples," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 54-74, January.
    15. Danielle J Brick & Gràinne M Fitzsimons & Tanya L Chartrand & Gavan J Fitzsimons & Gita JoharEditor & Sharon ShavittAssociate Editor, 2018. "Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand Compatibility, Relationship Power, and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 991-1014.
    16. Munro, Alistair & McNally, Tara & Popov, Danail, 2008. "Taking it in turn: an experimental test of theories of the household," MPRA Paper 8976, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Li-San Hung, 2017. "Married couples’ decision-making about household natural hazard preparedness: a case study of hurricane hazards in Sarasota County, Florida," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 1057-1081, June.
    18. Ling, Yan & Baldridge, David & Craig, Justin B., 2012. "The impact of family structure on issue selling by successor generation members in family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 220-227.
    19. Goodrich, Kendall & Mangleburg, Tamara F., 2010. "Adolescent perceptions of parent and peer influences on teen purchase: An application of social power theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 1328-1335, December.
    20. Maria Ashraf & Kaleem Mohammad Khan, 2016. "Spousal role and family vacation decision making in India," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 45-61.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:21:y:2017:i:1:p:75-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.