IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/manlab/v37y2012i4p295-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personal Characteristics of Indian Entrepreneurs and Intrapreneurs

Author

Listed:
  • Ravindra Jain

    (Ravindra Jain is Professor in Business Management, Faculty of Management Studies, Vikram University, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, India. E-mail: jainravindrak@rediffmail.com)

  • Saiyed Wajid Ali

    (Saiyed Wajid Ali is Assistant Professor in Management, Centre for Management Studies, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi (A Central University of India). E-mail: saiyed.wajid@gmail.com)

Abstract

The present study examined the psychological characteristics of the entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs in terms of six variables, namely, achievement orientation, innovativeness, internal locus of control, risk-taking propensity, proactiveness and self-efficacy, and such an examination was also done with reference to the following five demographic features: gender, education level, family background, work experience and age range of the entrepreneurs/intrapreneurs. The study was carried out with sample survey of 134 entrepreneurs (owner–managers) and 116 intrapreneurs (corporate managers) belonging to various service provider enterprises of India. All the psychological characteristics (except ‘risk-taking propensity’) were found as moderately positive in case of both male and female entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs without significant variation. The risk-taking propensity was perceived as ‘less positive’ by the entrepreneurs and it was found to be significantly higher for female intrapreneurs as compared to that of male intrapreneurs. The entrepreneurs belonging to business family background were found significantly better than the entrepreneurs belonging to rest of the backgrounds (namely, farming, service in private company and service in public/government organization) with regard to the characteristics like achievement orientation, innovativeness, internal locus of control and risk-taking propensity. In the matter of ‘risk-taking propensity’ of intrapreneurs, those from private sector service families were found to be better than intrapreneurs from farming and business families. In the matter of ‘self-efficacy’, intrapreneurs belonging to private service background were found to be better than intrapreneurs belonging to background of public/government service. Post-graduate entrepreneurs were found to be better in achievement orientation than others; non-graduate entrepreneurs were found more proactive than others; and non-graduates were found more innovative than post-graduates. Post-graduate intrapreneurs were found better in risk-taking propensity than graduates, as well as they were found better in achievement orientation than non-graduates; whereas self-efficacy of non-graduates was found better than that of graduates and non-graduates. Comparatively, younger entrepreneurs were found more proactive than others; and those in their middle ages were found to have high locus of control and risk-taking propensity than others. Middle-aged intrapreneurs were found comparatively better in internal locus of control than those who were relatively younger and relatively elder. All those who were elder (40 years and above) were found to be more proactive than those who were relatively younger. Those who were younger (for example, 25–30 years) were found to have less achievement orientation than rest of the intrapreneurs. There is no significant impact of work experience of the entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs found on their psychological characteristics (except on the proactiveness of the intrapreneurs). Age, gender and family background were found as important predictors in discriminating between the two groups of entrepreneurs—one with low level and other with moderate level of such characteristics. But, in case of intrapreneurs, the discriminant analysis has shown dissimilar results. The results of the study do not match fully with the findings of earlier research, and hence the research on personal characteristics of the entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs appeared to be inconclusive.

Suggested Citation

  • Ravindra Jain & Saiyed Wajid Ali, 2012. "Personal Characteristics of Indian Entrepreneurs and Intrapreneurs," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 37(4), pages 295-322, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:manlab:v:37:y:2012:i:4:p:295-322
    DOI: 10.1177/0258042X13484870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0258042X13484870
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0258042X13484870?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard L. Mccline & Subodh Bhat & Pam Baj, 2000. "Opportunity Recognition: An Exploratory Investigation of a Component of the Entrepreneurial Process in the Context of the Health Care Industry," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(2), pages 81-94, December.
    2. William Bygrave & Maria Minniti, 2000. "The Social Dynamics of Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 24(3), pages 25-36, April.
    3. Jeen Wei Ong & Hishamuddin Bin Ismail, 2011. "Entrepreneurial traits and firm performance: is gender a matter?," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(4), pages 499-517.
    4. Westhead, Paul, 1990. "A typology of new manufacturing firm founders in Wales: Performance measures and public policy implications," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 103-122, March.
    5. Miner, John B. & Smith, Norman R. & Bracker, Jeffrey S., 1992. "Defining the inventor-entrepreneur in the context of established typologies," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 103-113, March.
    6. Jeffry A. Timmons, 1978. "Characteristics and Role Demands of Entrepreneurship1," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 3(1), pages 5-17, July.
    7. Peter B. Robinson & David V. Stimpson & Jonathan C. Huefner & H. Keith Hunt, 1991. "An Attitude Approach to the Prediction of Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 15(4), pages 13-32, July.
    8. Macmillan, Ian C. & Siegel, Robin & Narasimha, P. N. Subba, 1985. "Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 119-128.
    9. Hema Wijewardena & Shiran Cooray, 1996. "Factors Contributing To The Growth Of Small Manufacturing Firms: Perceptions Of Japanese Owner/Managers," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(04), pages 351-361.
    10. Douglass, Merrill E., 1976. "Relating education to entrepreneurial success," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 40-44, December.
    11. Herron, Lanny & Robinson, Richard Jr., 1993. "A structural model of the effects of entrepreneurial characteristics on venture performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 281-294, May.
    12. Don Y. Lee & Eric W. K. Tsang, 2001. "The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 583-602, June.
    13. Colombo, Massimo G. & Grilli, Luca, 2005. "Founders' human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 795-816, August.
    14. Hall, John & Hofer, Charles W., 1993. "Venture capitalists' decision criteria in new venture evaluation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 25-42, January.
    15. Dean A. Shepherd & Holger Patzelt, 2011. "The New Field of Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Studying Entrepreneurial Action Linking “What is to be Sustained†with “What is to be Developedâ€," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 137-163, January.
    16. R. Keith Schwer & Ugur Yucelt, 1984. "A Study of Risk-Taking Propensities among Small Business Entrepreneurs and Managers: an Empirical Evaluation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 8(3), pages 31-40, January.
    17. Duchesneau, Donald A. & Gartner, William B., 1990. "A profile of new venture success and failure in an emerging industry," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 5(5), pages 297-312, September.
    18. Adnan Ozyilmaz, 2011. "The effects of demographic characteristics on entrepreneurial intention in the pre-venture stage of entrepreneurship," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(3), pages 406-424.
    19. Souitaris, Vangelis & Zerbinati, Stefania & Al-Laham, Andreas, 2007. "Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 566-591, July.
    20. Levesque, Moren & Minniti, Maria, 2006. "The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behavior," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 177-194, March.
    21. Stuart, Robert W. & Abetti, Pier A., 1990. "Impact of entrepreneurial and management experience on early performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 151-162, May.
    22. Alexei Tkachev & Lars Kolvereid, 1999. "Self-employment intentions among Russian students," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 269-280, July.
    23. Douglas, Evan J. & Shepherd, Dean A., 2000. "Entrepreneurship as a utility maximizing response," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 231-251, May.
    24. Robinson, Peter B. & Sexton, Edwin A., 1994. "The effect of education and experience on self-employment success," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 141-156, March.
    25. Stein Kristiansen & Nurul Indarti, 2004. "Entrepreneurial Intention Among Indonesian And Norwegian Students," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(01), pages 55-78.
    26. StewartJr., Wayne H. & Watson, Warren E. & Carland, Joann C. & Carland, James W., 1999. "A proclivity for entrepreneurship: A comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 189-214, March.
    27. Lars Kolvereid, 1996. "Prediction of Employment Status Choice Intentions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 21(1), pages 47-58, October.
    28. Arnold C. Cooper & William C. Dunkelberg, 1987. "Entrepreneurial Research: Old Questions, New Answers and Methodological Issues," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 11(3), pages 11-24, January.
    29. Friederike Welter, 2011. "Contextualizing Entrepreneurship—Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(1), pages 165-184, January.
    30. Cooper, Arnold C. & Bruno, Albert V., 1977. "Success among high-technology firms," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 16-22, April.
    31. Holly Buttner, E., 1993. "Female entrepreneurs: How far have they come?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 59-65.
    32. Henry R. Feeser & Gary E. Willard, 1990. "Founding strategy and performance: A comparison of high and low growth high tech firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 87-98, February.
    33. Gideon D. Markman & David B. Balkin & Robert A. Baron, 2002. "Inventors and New Venture Formation: the Effects of General Self–Efficacy and Regretful Thinking," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 27(2), pages 149-165, April.
    34. Begley, Thomas M. & Boyd, David P., 1987. "Psychological characteristics associated with performence in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 79-93.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Kannadhasan & Pankaj Singh & Parikshit Charan & Pavan Kumar Balivada, 2018. "Personality characteristics and the process of start-up: the moderating role of institutional environment," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 45(4), pages 287-300, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ravindra K. Jain, 2011. "Entrepreneurial Competencies," Vision, , vol. 15(2), pages 127-152, June.
    2. Nigam, Nirjhar & Benetti, Cristiane & Johan, Sofia A., 2020. "Digital start-up access to venture capital financing: What signals quality?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    3. Kelley A. Packalen, 2007. "Complementing Capital: The Role of Status, Demographic Features, and Social Capital in Founding Teams’ Abilities to Obtain Resources," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(6), pages 873-891, November.
    4. Shirokova, Galina & Osiyevskyy, Oleksiy & Bogatyreva, Karina, 2016. "Exploring the intention–behavior link in student entrepreneurship: Moderating effects of individual and environmental characteristics," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 386-399.
    5. Cuong Nguyen, 2018. "Demographic factors, family background and prior self-employment on entrepreneurial intention - Vietnamese business students are different: why?," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Sascha G. Walter & Achim Walter, 2009. "Personenbezogene Determinanten von Unternehmensgründungen: Stand der Forschung und Perspektiven des Fortschritts," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 57-89, February.
    7. James J. Chrisman & Alan Bauerschmidt & Charles W. Hofer, 1998. "The Determinants of New Venture Performance: An Extended Model," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(1), pages 5-29, October.
    8. Colombo, Massimo G. & Grilli, Luca, 2010. "On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: Exploring the role of founders' human capital and venture capital," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 610-626, November.
    9. Soriano, Domingo Ribeiro, 2010. "Management factors affecting the performance of technology firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(5), pages 463-470, May.
    10. Denis A. Grégoire & Martin X. Noël & Richard Déry & Jean–Pierre Béchard, 2006. "Is There Conceptual Convergence in Entrepreneurship Research? A Co–Citation Analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981–2004," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(3), pages 333-373, May.
    11. Heinrichs, Simon & Walter, Sascha, 2013. "Who Becomes an Entrepreneur? A 30-Years-Review of Individual-Level Research and an Agenda for Future Research," EconStor Preprints 68590, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    12. Ravindra Jain & Saiyed Wajid Ali & Sachin Kamble, 2015. "Entrepreneurial and Intrapreneurial Attitudes: Conceptualization, Measure Development, Measure Test and Model Fit," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 40(1-2), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Rabindra Kumar Pradhan & Papri Nath, 2012. "Perception of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Emotional Intelligence," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 13(1), pages 89-108, February.
    14. Kwaku Amofah & Ramon Saladrigues, 2020. "Going Down Memory Lane in the Application of Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behaviour Model to Measure Entrepreneurial Intention: An Sem-Pls Approach," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 110-121.
    15. Zellweger, Thomas & Sieger, Philipp & Halter, Frank, 2011. "Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 521-536, September.
    16. Rajib Roy & Fatima Akhtar & Niladri Das, 2017. "Entrepreneurial intention among science & technology students in India: extending the theory of planned behavior," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1013-1041, December.
    17. von Graevenitz, Georg & Harhoff, Dietmar & Weber, Richard, 2010. "The effects of entrepreneurship education," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 90-112, October.
    18. Ingrid Verheul & Martin Carree & Roy Thurik, 2009. "Allocation and productivity of time in new ventures of female and male entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 273-291, October.
    19. Ge, Dingkun & Mahoney, James M. & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2005. "New Venture Valuation by Venture Capitalists: An Integrative Approach," Working Papers 05-0124, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    20. Kayhan Tajeddini & Stephen Mueller, 2009. "Entrepreneurial characteristics in Switzerland and the UK: A comparative study of techno-entrepreneurs," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-25, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:manlab:v:37:y:2012:i:4:p:295-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.xlri.ac.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.