IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jedbes/v46y2021i6p682-716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Rating Scale Mixture Model to Account for the Tendency to Middle and Extreme Categories

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Colombi

    (University of Bergamo)

  • Sabrina Giordano

    (University of Calabria)

  • Gerhard Tutz

    (Ludwig Maximilians University Munich)

Abstract

A mixture of logit models is proposed that discriminates between responses to rating questions that are affected by a tendency to prefer middle or extremes of the scale regardless of the content of the item (response styles) and purely content-driven preferences. Explanatory variables are used to characterize the content-driven way of answering as well as the tendency to middle or extreme categories. The proposed model is extended to account for the presence of response styles in the case of several items, and the association among responses is described, both when they are content driven or dictated by response styles. In addition, stochastic orderings, related to the tendency to select middle or extreme categories, are introduced and investigated. A simulation study describes the effectiveness of the proposed model, and an application to a questionnaire on attitudes toward ethnic minorities illustrates the applicability of the modeling approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Colombi & Sabrina Giordano & Gerhard Tutz, 2021. "A Rating Scale Mixture Model to Account for the Tendency to Middle and Extreme Categories," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 46(6), pages 682-716, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:46:y:2021:i:6:p:682-716
    DOI: 10.3102/1076998621992554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/1076998621992554
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3102/1076998621992554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D'Elia, Angela & Piccolo, Domenico, 2005. "A mixture model for preferences data analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 917-934, June.
    2. Tutz, G. & Berger, M., 2017. "Separating location and dispersion in ordinal regression models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 131-148.
    3. Rosaria Simone & Gerhard Tutz, 2018. "Modelling uncertainty and response styles in ordinal data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 72(3), pages 224-245, August.
    4. White, Halbert, 1982. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Forcina, Antonio, 2008. "Identifiability of extended latent class models with individual covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 5263-5268, August.
    6. Timothy Johnson, 2003. "On the use of heterogeneous thresholds ordinal regression models to account for individual differences in response style," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 563-583, December.
    7. Roberto Colombi & Sabrina Giordano, 2019. "Likelihood-based tests for a class of misspecified finite mixture models for ordinal categorical data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(4), pages 1175-1202, December.
    8. Anna Gottard & Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo, 2016. "Varying uncertainty in CUB models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(2), pages 225-244, June.
    9. Rossi P. E & Gilula Z. & Allenby G. M, 2001. "Overcoming Scale Usage Heterogeneity: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 20-31, March.
    10. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 389-435, September.
    11. Roberto Colombi & Sabrina Giordano & Anna Gottard & Maria Iannario, 2019. "Hierarchical marginal models with latent uncertainty," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 46(2), pages 595-620, June.
    12. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "Rejoinder to the discussion of “The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 477-493, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2022. "A mixture model for ordinal variables measured on semantic differential scales," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 98-123.
    2. Roberto Colombi & Sabrina Giordano, 2019. "Likelihood-based tests for a class of misspecified finite mixture models for ordinal categorical data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(4), pages 1175-1202, December.
    3. Rosaria Simone, 2023. "Uncertainty Diagnostics of Binomial Regression Trees for Ordered Rating Data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 40(1), pages 79-105, April.
    4. Rosaria Simone, 2021. "An accelerated EM algorithm for mixture models with uncertainty for rating data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 691-714, March.
    5. Simone, Rosaria & Tutz, Gerhard & Iannario, Maria, 2020. "Subjective heterogeneity in response attitude for multivariate ordinal outcomes," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 145-158.
    6. Rosaria Simone, 2022. "On finite mixtures of Discretized Beta model for ordered responses," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(3), pages 828-855, September.
    7. Capecchi, Stefania & Amato, Mario & Sodano, Valeria & Verneau, Fabio, 2019. "Understanding beliefs and concerns towards palm oil: Empirical evidence and policy implications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. E. Nardo & R. Simone, 2019. "A model-based fuzzy analysis of questionnaires," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(2), pages 187-215, June.
    9. Ribecco, Nunziata & D'Uggento, Angela Maria & Labarile, Angela, 2022. "What influences the perception of immigration in Italian adolescents? An analysis with CUB models for rating data," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    10. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 389-435, September.
    11. Stefania Capecchi & Maria Iannario & Rosaria Simone, 2018. "Well-Being and Relational Goods: A Model-Based Approach to Detect Significant Relationships," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 729-750, January.
    12. Kim, Jung Seek & Ratchford, Brian T., 2013. "A Bayesian multivariate probit for ordinal data with semiparametric random-effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 192-208.
    13. Maria Iannario & Domenico Piccolo, 2016. "A comprehensive framework of regression models for ordinal data," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 74(2), pages 233-252, August.
    14. Gerhard Tutz, 2020. "Modelling heterogeneity: on the problem of group comparisons with logistic regression and the potential of the heterogeneous choice model," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(3), pages 517-542, September.
    15. Colombi, Roberto, 2020. "Selection tests for possibly misspecified hierarchical multinomial marginal models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 136-147.
    16. Lynd Bacon & Peter Lenk, 2012. "Augmenting discrete-choice data to identify common preference scales for inter-subject analyses," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 453-474, December.
    17. Domenico Piccolo & Rosaria Simone, 2019. "Rejoinder to the discussion of “The class of cub models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 477-493, September.
    18. Bettina Grün & Sara Dolnicar, 2016. "Response style corrected market segmentation for ordinal data," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 729-741, December.
    19. de Jong, M.G., 2006. "Response bias in international marketing research," Other publications TiSEM 5d4031be-97b5-4db3-962b-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Roberto Colombi & Sabrina Giordano & Anna Gottard, 2019. "Discussion of “The class of CUB models: statistical foundations, inferential issues and empirical evidence”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 441-444, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:46:y:2021:i:6:p:682-716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.