IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inrsre/v7y1982i1p53-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Interregional Linkages between National and Regional Input-Output Models

Author

Listed:
  • David F. Batten

    (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Graham Road, Highett, Victoria 3190 Australia)

Abstract

Elements of information theory are applied to the problem of estimating interregional flow coefficients in a national system of regions. The inclusion of constraints relating to the capacity of the transportation system justifies the adoption of Jaynes' principle of maximum uncertainty, in place of iterative proportional fitting procedures developed for multidimensional contingency table analysis. The inclusion of a priori information is also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • David F. Batten, 1982. "The Interregional Linkages between National and Regional Input-Output Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 7(1), pages 53-67, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:7:y:1982:i:1:p:53-67
    DOI: 10.1177/016001768200700103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016001768200700103
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/016001768200700103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanislaw Czamanski & Emil E. Malizia, 1969. "Applicability And Limitations In The Use Of National Input‐Output Tables For Regional Studies," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 65-78, January.
    2. William A. Schaffer & Kong Chu, 1969. "Nonsurvey Techniques For Constructing Regional Interindustry Models," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 83-104, January.
    3. Snickars, Folke & Weibull, Jorgen W., 1977. "A minimum information principle : Theory and practice," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1-2), pages 137-168, March.
    4. Richard Stone & Alan Brown, 1965. "Behavioural and Technical Change in Economic Models," International Economic Association Series, in: E. A. G. Robinson (ed.), Problems in Economic Development, chapter 0, pages 428-443, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Siyuan & Chen, Bin & Fath, Brian, 2015. "Trans-boundary total suspended particulate matter (TSPM) in urban ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 59-63.
    2. Kristinn Hermannsson, 2016. "Beyond Intermediates: The Role of Consumption and Commuting in the Construction of Local Input–Output Tables," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 315-339, July.
    3. Heiwai Tang & Fei Wang & Zhi Wang, 2016. "Extending the Input-Output Table Based on Firm-level Data," CESifo Working Paper Series 5811, CESifo.
    4. Jahn, Malte, 2015. "A location quotient-based interregional input-output (IRIOLQ) framework," HWWI Research Papers 161, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongli Zhang & Lei Shen & Shuai Zhong & Ayman Elshkaki, 2020. "Economic Structure Transformation and Low-Carbon Development in Energy-Rich Cities: The Case of the Contiguous Area of Shanxi and Shaanxi Provinces, and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Yu, Yang & Hubacek, Klaus & Feng, Kuishuang & Guan, Dabo, 2010. "Assessing regional and global water footprints for the UK," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1140-1147, March.
    3. Benjamin H. Stevens & George I. Treyz & David J. Ehrlich & James R. Bower, 1983. "A New Technique for the Construction of Non-Survey Regional Input-Output Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 271-286, December.
    4. William H. Miernyk, 1976. "Comments on Recent Developments in Regional Input-Output Analysis," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 1(2), pages 47-55, October.
    5. Jeffery I. Round, 1983. "Nonsurvey Techniques: A Critical Review of the Theory and the Evidence," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 189-212, December.
    6. Xiaoyun Zhao & Sung-Goan Choi, 2015. "On the regionalization of input–output tables with an industry-specific location quotient," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 901-926, May.
    7. Gurgul, Henryk, 2007. "Stochastic input-output modeling," MPRA Paper 68573, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2007.
    8. Kristinn Hermannsson, 2016. "Beyond Intermediates: The Role of Consumption and Commuting in the Construction of Local Input–Output Tables," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 315-339, July.
    9. Abareshi, Maryam & Zaferanieh, Mehdi, 2019. "A bi-level capacitated P-median facility location problem with the most likely allocation solution," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-20.
    10. Eliasson, Jonas & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2000. "A model for integrated analysis of household location and travel choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 375-394, June.
    11. Lindbeck, Assar & Weibull, Jörgen, 2020. "Delegation of investment decisions, and optimal remuneration of agents," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    12. Börjesson, Maria & Eliasson, Jonas & Franklin, Joel, 2012. "Valuations of travel time variability in scheduling versus mean-variance models," Working papers in Transport Economics 2012:2, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    13. Robison, M. H., 1992. "A Technique For Making Upward Adjustments In National Coefficients In Pool-Quotient Non-Survey Regional I-O Models," A.E. Research Series 305097, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    14. Lenzen, Manfred & Dey, Christopher & Foran, Barney, 2004. "Energy requirements of Sydney households," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 375-399, July.
    15. David A. Plane, 1981. "Estimation of Place-to-Place Migration Flows from Net Migration Totals: A Minimum Information Approach," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 6(1), pages 33-51, April.
    16. McKusick, Robert & Bills, Nelson & Clark, Richard & Jones, Clifford & Niehaus, Robert & Palmer, Charles & Stipe, Sterling & Wilkins, John & Zygadlo, Linda, 1978. "Regional Development and Plan Evaluation: The Use of Input-Output Analysis," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 321952, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Elias Giannakis, 2010. "An input-output approach in assessing the impact of extensive versus intensive farming systems on rural development: the case of Greece," Working Papers 2010-01, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    18. Marek Radvanský & Ivan Lichner, 2021. "An alternative approach to the construction of multi-regional input–output tables of the Czech Republic: application of the CHARM method," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1083-1111, November.
    19. K.W. Clements & Y. Qiang, 1998. "A New Input-output Table for Western Australia - Part 2," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 98-16, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    20. Giannakis, Elias & Efstratoglou, Sophia, 2011. "An input-output approach in assessing the CAP reform impact of extensive versus intensive farming systems on rural development: The case of Greece," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 12(1).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:7:y:1982:i:1:p:53-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.