IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v24y2023i2p371-392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply Chain Performance and Profitability in Indian Automobile Industry: Evidence of Segmental Difference

Author

Listed:
  • Saswati Tripathi
  • Bijoy Talukder

Abstract

The automobile industry is broadly categorized into three segments—commercial vehicles, passenger vehicles and two/three-wheelers. The automobile supply chain is complex, as this includes raw material suppliers, component manufacturers, sub assemblers, final assemblers, different distribution channels, networks and end consumers. This demands a robust supply chain that can integrate all these links for cost efficiency and profitability. The objectives of this article are to find segmental differences in the supply chain performance of the Indian automobile industry and to quantify the impact of supply chain performance on the overall profitability of the firms across the segments. This article measures the performance of the supply chain of Indian automobile industry segments integrating supply chain financial metrics and supply chain operations reference key performance indicators (SCOR KPIs) through a 10-year timeline. The results are compared across segments to identify unique performance features, if any, using ANOVA. A panel data fixed effect model (least square dummy variable [LSDV]) is constructed to establish the relationship between supply chain performance and profitability and to understand whether the identified supply chain performance variables have any significant impact on profitability across the segments. This article has evidenced that though the supply chain of two/three-wheelers segment is performing better in fixed asset and inventory turnover it is more impacted by distribution inefficiency. The supply chain of the commercial-vehicles segment is impacted more by excess fixed assets, distribution inefficiency and poor inventory turnover. Although inventory turnover of passenger-vehicles segment is better than that of the commercial vehicles, the supply chain fixed assets remain a concern for this segment. Across the industry segments, the profitability of the segment is more impacted by poor distribution efficiency compared to fixed assets and inventory turnover. This article contributes towards finding key segmental supply chain performance features of the Indian automobile industry and building a panel data fixed effect model by integrating supply chain performance indicators with the profitability of the firms across the segments. This model can contribute towards effective decision-making in the automobile supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Saswati Tripathi & Bijoy Talukder, 2023. "Supply Chain Performance and Profitability in Indian Automobile Industry: Evidence of Segmental Difference," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(2), pages 371-392, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:24:y:2023:i:2:p:371-392
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150919898302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150919898302
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150919898302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harri Laihonen & Sanna Pekkola, 2016. "Impacts of using a performance measurement system in supply chain management: a case study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(18), pages 5607-5617, September.
    2. Daniel J. Vine & Valerie A. Ramey, 2006. "Declining Volatility in the U.S. Automobile Industry," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1876-1889, December.
    3. Illi Kim & Changhee Kim, 2018. "Supply Chain Efficiency Measurement to Maintain Sustainable Performance in the Automobile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Bhaumik, Sankar Kumar, 2015. "Principles of Econometrics: A Modern Approach Using EViews," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198098539.
    5. Wojciech Piotrowicz & Richard Cuthbertson, 2015. "Performance measurement and metrics in supply chains: an exploratory study," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 64(8), pages 1068-1091, November.
    6. Sharon Novak & Scott Stern, 2008. "How Does Outsourcing Affect Performance Dynamics? Evidence from the Automobile Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(12), pages 1963-1979, December.
    7. Montserrat Pallares-Barbera, 1998. "Changing Production Systems: The Automobile Industry in Spain," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(4), pages 344-359, October.
    8. Corey C. Phelps & Ralph Heidl & Anu Wadhwa, 2012. "Networks, knowledge, and knowledge networks: A critical review and research agenda," Post-Print hal-00715591, HAL.
    9. Wojciech Piotrowicz & Richard Cuthbertson, 2015. "Performance measurement and metrics in supply chains: an exploratory study," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 64(8), pages 1068-1091, November.
    10. Anja Schulze & John Paul MacDuffie & Florian A. Täube, 2015. "Introduction: knowledge generation and innovation diffusion in the global automotive industry—change and stability during turbulent times," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 24(3), pages 603-611.
    11. Chan K. Hahn & Edward A. Duplaga & Janet L. Hartley, 2000. "Supply-Chain Synchronization: Lessons from Hyundai Motor Company," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 32-45, August.
    12. Suk Ho Jin & Suk Jae Jeong & Kyung Sup Kim, 2017. "A Linkage Model of Supply Chain Operation and Financial Performance for Economic Sustainability of Firm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, January.
    13. Scott R. Swenseth & David L. Olson, 2016. "Trade-offs in lean vs. outsourced supply chains," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(13), pages 4065-4080, July.
    14. Gunasekaran, A. & Patel, C. & McGaughey, Ronald E., 2004. "A framework for supply chain performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 333-347, February.
    15. Pradipta Kumar Sahoo & Badri Narayan Rath, 2018. "Productivity growth, efficiency change and source of inefficiency: evidence from the Indian automobile industry," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(1), pages 59-74.
    16. Karthik Balakrishnan & Sridhar Seshadri & Anshul Sheopuri & Ananth Iyer, 2007. "Indian Auto-Component Supply Chain at the Crossroads," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 310-323, August.
    17. Dominik Eckstein & Matthias Goellner & Constantin Blome & Michael Henke, 2015. "The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: the moderating effect of product complexity," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(10), pages 3028-3046, May.
    18. Stanley Baiman & Paul E. Fischer & Madhav V. Rajan, 2001. "Performance Measurement and Design in Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 173-188, January.
    19. Timothy Sturgeon & Johannes Van Biesebroeck & Gary Gereffi, 2008. "Value chains, networks and clusters: reframing the global automotive industry," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 297-321, May.
    20. Peter Kennedy, 2003. "A Guide to Econometrics, 5th Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 5, volume 1, number 026261183x, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. DeCampos, Hugo A. & Rosales, Claudia R. & Narayanan, Sriram, 2022. "Supply chain horizontal complexity and the moderating impact of inventory turns: A study of the automotive component industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    2. Tongtong Jiang & Xiuguo Wu & Yunxiao Yin, 2023. "Logistics Efficiency Evaluation and Empirical Research under the New Retailing Model: The Way toward Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Joshi, Deepika & Nepal, Bimal & Rathore, Ajay Pal Singh & Sharma, Dipti, 2013. "On supply chain competitiveness of Indian automotive component manufacturing industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 151-161.
    4. Calabrese, Giuseppe Giulio & Manello, Alessandro, 2018. "Firm internationalization and performance: Evidence for designing policies," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1221-1242.
    5. Gonzalez-Brambila, Claudia N. & Veloso, Francisco M. & Krackhardt, David, 2013. "The impact of network embeddedness on research output," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1555-1567.
    6. Sachin S. Kamble & Angappa Gunasekaran & Nachiappan Subramanian & Abhijeet Ghadge & Amine Belhadi & Mani Venkatesh, 2023. "Blockchain technology’s impact on supply chain integration and sustainable supply chain performance: evidence from the automotive industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 575-600, August.
    7. Sima M. Fortsch & Jeong Hoon Choi & Elena A. Khapalova, 2022. "Competition can help predict sales," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(2), pages 331-344, March.
    8. Hald, Kim Sundtoft & Mouritsen, Jan, 2018. "The evolution of performance measurement systems in a supply chain: A longitudinal case study on the role of interorganisational factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 256-271.
    9. Jinsuk Yang & Qing Hao & Mahmut Yaşar, 2023. "Institutional investors and cross‐border mergers and acquisitions: The 2000–2018 period," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 553-583, September.
    10. Styan, Jacob & Boerngen, Maria A. & Barrowclough, Michael J., 2021. "Factors Influencing Increased Usage of Cash Rent Leases in Illinois," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2021.
    11. Jason Barabas, 1998. "Wage Erosion, Economic Assessments, and Social Welfare Opinions," JCPR Working Papers 56, Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research.
    12. Wang, Liang & Tan, Justin & Li, Wan, 2018. "The impacts of spatial positioning on regional new venture creation and firm mortality over the industry life cycle," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 41-52.
    13. repec:kap:iaecre:v:17:y:2011:i:2:p:157-168 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. David M. Brasington & Diane Hite, 2005. "Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic Approach," Departmental Working Papers 2005-08, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    15. Yakubu, Ibrahim Nandom, 2022. "Exploring the Drivers of Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Interactive Effect of Globalization and Financial Development," MPRA Paper 115230, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Berna Karali & Scott H. Irwin & Olga Isengildina‐Massa, 2020. "Supply Fundamentals and Grain Futures Price Movements," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(2), pages 548-568, March.
    17. Frida Thomas Pacho, 2018. "Diversified Network Effects on Innovation Performance in Tanzania: Innovation Strategy in Service Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation, Macrothink Institute, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation, vol. 5(1), pages 1-1, December.
    18. Sharon Novak & Scott Stern, 2009. "Complementarity Among Vertical Integration Decisions: Evidence from Automobile Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 311-332, February.
    19. Christopher Hansman & Jonas Hjort & Gianmarco León-Ciliotta & Matthieu Teachout, 2020. "Vertical Integration, Supplier Behavior, and Quality Upgrading among Exporters," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(9), pages 3570-3625.
    20. Carlberg, Jared G., 2002. "Effects Of Ownership Restrictions On Farmland Values In Saskatchewan," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(2), pages 1-10, August.
    21. Isaksson, Olov H.D. & Simeth, Markus & Seifert, Ralf W., 2016. "Knowledge spillovers in the supply chain: Evidence from the high tech sectors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 699-706.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:24:y:2023:i:2:p:371-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.