IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i8p2852-d163186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply Chain Efficiency Measurement to Maintain Sustainable Performance in the Automobile Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Illi Kim

    (College of Business Administration, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Changhee Kim

    (College of Business Administration, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Korea)

Abstract

The automobile industry is set to undergo a structural transformation in the progress toward next-generation industries that involve autonomous vehicles and connected cars. Thus, supply chain management has become increasingly important for corporate competitiveness. This study aims to identify opportunities for improving supply chain performance by quantifying the impact of suppliers on the supply chain. An analysis was conducted in two phases. First, the efficiency of 139 partners that supply automobile components to the Hyundai Motor Company was measured using the Charnes–Cooper–Rhodes model, while the efficiency of Hyundai Motor Company’s 540 supply chains comprising partners, subsidiaries, and parent companies was measured using the network epsilon-based measure model. Second, the relationship between the partner efficiency and the supply chain efficiency was analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test and the Tobit regression model. The results showed that efficient operation of partners hampers the efficiency of the total supply chain. Thus, there may be several partners that are not committed to quality improvement, while the Hyundai Motor Company seeks to promote quality management through win–win cooperation with partners. Consequently, automakers must review their partner management system, including their performance measurement and incentive systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Illi Kim & Changhee Kim, 2018. "Supply Chain Efficiency Measurement to Maintain Sustainable Performance in the Automobile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2852-:d:163186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2852/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2852/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weber, Charles A. & Current, John R. & Benton, W. C., 1991. "Vendor selection criteria and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 2-18, January.
    2. Chen, Ci & Yan, Hong, 2011. "Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 147-155, August.
    3. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2010. "An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA - A third pole of technical efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1554-1563, December.
    4. Tone, Kaoru & Tsutsui, Miki, 2009. "Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 243-252, August.
    5. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    6. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    7. Liang Liang & Feng Yang & Wade Cook & Joe Zhu, 2006. "DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 35-49, July.
    8. Hoff, Ayoe, 2007. "Second stage DEA: Comparison of approaches for modelling the DEA score," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 425-435, August.
    9. Tariq, Yasir Bin & Abbas, Zaheer, 2013. "Compliance and multidimensional firm performance: Evaluating the efficacy of rule-based code of corporate governance," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 565-575.
    10. Pradipta Kumar Sahoo & Badri Narayan Rath, 2018. "Productivity growth, efficiency change and source of inefficiency: evidence from the Indian automobile industry," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(1), pages 59-74.
    11. Arshinder & Kanda, Arun & Deshmukh, S.G., 2008. "Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 316-335, October.
    12. Wai Peng Wong & Wikrom Jaruphongsa & Loo Hay Lee, 2008. "Supply chain performance measurement system: a Monte Carlo DEA-based approach," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 162-188.
    13. Banker, Rajiv D. & Zheng, Zhiqiang (Eric) & Natarajan, Ram, 2010. "DEA-based hypothesis tests for comparing two groups of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 231-238, October.
    14. Saranga, Haritha, 2009. "The Indian auto component industry - Estimation of operational efficiency and its determinants using DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 707-718, July.
    15. Ramanathan, Usha & Gunasekaran, Angappa, 2014. "Supply chain collaboration: Impact of success in long-term partnerships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 252-259.
    16. Zhou, Peng & Poh, Kim Leng & Ang, Beng Wah, 2007. "A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 1-9, April.
    17. Alessandro Manello & Giuseppe G. Calabrese & Piercarlo Frigero, 2016. "Technical efficiency and productivity growth along the automotive value chain: evidence from Italy," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(2), pages 245-259.
    18. Talluri, Srinivas & Narasimhan, Ram & Nair, Anand, 2006. "Vendor performance with supply risk: A chance-constrained DEA approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 212-222, April.
    19. Chia-Nan Wang & Xuan-Tho Nguyen & Yen-Hui Wang, 2016. "Automobile Industry Strategic Alliance Partner Selection: The Application of a Hybrid DEA and Grey Theory Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Patrick L. Brockett & Boaz Golany, 1996. "Using Rank Statistics for Determining Programmatic Efficiency Differences in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 466-472, March.
    21. Xu, Xin & Cui, Qiang, 2017. "Evaluating airline energy efficiency: An integrated approach with Network Epsilon-based Measure and Network Slacks-based Measure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 274-286.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Min Wang & Meng Ji & Xiaofen Wu & Kexin Deng & Xiaodong Jing, 2023. "Analysis on Evaluation and Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Port Cluster Eco-Efficiency: Case Study from the Yangtze River Delta in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Saswati Tripathi & Bijoy Talukder, 2023. "Supply Chain Performance and Profitability in Indian Automobile Industry: Evidence of Segmental Difference," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(2), pages 371-392, April.
    3. Chia-Nan Wang & Van Thanh Nguyen & Hoang Tuyet Nhi Thai & Ngoc Nguyen Tran & Thi Lan Anh Tran, 2018. "Sustainable Supplier Selection Process in Edible Oil Production by a Hybrid Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Green Data Envelopment Analysis for the SMEs Food Processing Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javad Gerami & Reza Kiani Mavi & Reza Farzipoor Saen & Neda Kiani Mavi, 2023. "A novel network DEA-R model for evaluating hospital services supply chain performance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1041-1066, May.
    2. Somayeh Soheilirad & Kannan Govindan & Abbas Mardani & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Norhayati Zakuan, 2018. "Application of data envelopment analysis models in supply chain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 915-969, December.
    3. Ang, Sheng & Liu, Pei & Yang, Feng, 2020. "Intra-Organizational and inter-organizational resource allocation in two-stage network systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Alperovych, Yan & Amess, Kevin & Wright, Mike, 2013. "Private equity firm experience and buyout vendor source: What is their impact on efficiency?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 601-611.
    5. Despotis, Dimitris K. & Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris, 2016. "The “weak-link” approach to network DEA for two-stage processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 481-492.
    6. Kao, Chiang, 2019. "Inefficiency identification for closed series production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 599-607.
    7. Kao, Chiang, 2016. "Efficiency decomposition and aggregation in network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 778-786.
    8. Junhee Bae & Yanghon Chung & Hyesoo Ko, 2021. "Analysis of efficiency in public research activities in terms of knowledge spillover: focusing on earthquake R&D accomplishments," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(2), pages 2249-2264, September.
    9. Nafiseh Javaherian & Ali Hamzehee & Hossein Sayyadi Tooranloo, 2021. "A compositional approach to two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis in intuitionistic fuzzy environment," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(1), pages 21-39.
    10. Tatiana Bencova & Andrea Bohacikova, 2022. "DEA in Performance Measurement of Two-Stage Processes: Comparative Overview of the Literature," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 111-129.
    11. Pournader, Mehrdokht & Kach, Andrew & Fahimnia, Behnam & Sarkis, Joseph, 2019. "Outsourcing performance quality assessment using data envelopment analytics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 173-182.
    12. Ang, Sheng & Chen, Chien-Ming, 2016. "Pitfalls of decomposition weights in the additive multi-stage DEA model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 139-153.
    13. Ying Li & Yung-ho Chiu & Tai-Yu Lin, 2019. "The Impact of Economic Growth and Air Pollution on Public Health in 31 Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, January.
    14. Villa, G. & Lozano, S., 2016. "Assessing the scoring efficiency of a football match," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 559-569.
    15. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    16. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2016. "Research fronts in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    17. Nafiseh Javaherian & Ali Hamzehee & Hossein Sayyadi Tooranloo, 2021. "A compositional approach to two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis in intuitionistic fuzzy environment," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31, pages 21-39.
    18. Lim, Dong-Joon & Kim, Moon-Su, 2022. "Measuring dynamic efficiency with variable time lag effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    19. Kuo‐Cheng Kuo & Wen‐Min Lu & Dinh Tam Nguyen & Hsiu Fei Wang, 2020. "The effect of special economic zones on governance performance and their spillover effects in Chinese provinces," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 446-460, April.
    20. Zohreh Sadeghi & Reza Farzipoor Saen & Mahdi Moradzadehfard, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Developing a network data envelopment analysis model for appraising sustainable supply chains: a sustainability accounting approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 809-824, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:8:p:2852-:d:163186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.