Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Should We Differentiate Between Business And Private Customers?

Contents:

Author Info

  • Inger ROOS

    ()
    (Service Research Center, Karlstad University, 65188 Karlstad, Sweden)

  • Anders GUSTAFSSON

    ()
    (Service Research Center, Karlstad University, 65188 Karlstad, Sweden)

  • Bo EDVARDSSON

    ()
    (Service Research Center, Karlstad University, 65188 Karlstad, Sweden)

  • Peter LANDMARK

    ()
    (Karlstad Airport, 65188 Karlstad, Sweden)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The literature on how customers make their service-provider choices largely distinguishes between private and business customers, and companies’ offerings have been separated accordingly. This study takes a closer look at the possible differences between these two customer categories. The results are explorative and based on both qualitative and quantitative studies focusing on customers’ actual behavior. The findings show that it is not only job-related aspects such as “being able to work” that influence business travel, and that private matters such as “time with the family” are clearly of equal significance in the choice situation. Price perception is important, but only when it is set against the appropriate social costs. The contradiction appears in the airlines’ offers to these customers, which are generally specifically job related. The results of the present study show that most business customers are, in fact, “private customers”.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://mrp.ase.ro/no23/f2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania in its journal Management Research and Practice.

    Volume (Year): 2 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 3 (September)
    Pages: 249-263

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:2:y:2010:i:3:p:249-263

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 6 ROMANA PLACE, 70167 - BUCHAREST
    Phone: 0040-01-2112650
    Fax: 0040-01-3129549
    Email:
    Web page: http://ccasp.ase.ro/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: air travel; customer relationships; business-to-business relationships; preferences; choice; service;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Nedungadi, Prakash, 1990. " Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(3), pages 263-76, December.
    2. Woodside, Arch G. & Trappey, Randolph III, 1996. "Customer portfolio analysis among competing retail stores," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 189-200, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:2:y:2010:i:3:p:249-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Colesca Sofia) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Colesca Sofia to update the entry or send us the correct address.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.