Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Die ILO-Standards zum Schutz von Arbeitnehmerrechten – Ein Begruendungsversuch mit Hilfe der kantischen Position von Norman E. Bowie (The ILO’s Labour Standards for the Protection of Employee Rights – An Analysis Based on Norman E. Bowie’s Kantian Perspective on Business Ethics)

Contents:

Author Info

  • Baeumlisberger, Damian
  • Brink, Alexander
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Der Beitrag ergruendet die normativen Grundlagen der Standards zum Schutz der Arbeitnehmerrechte der International Labour Organization. Auf Basis der kantischen Position des US-amerikanischen Wirtschaftsethikers Norman E. Bowie zeigen die Autoren, dass sich Bowies Theorieansatz grundsaetzlich dazu eignet, die vier Kernbereiche der ILO-Aktivitaeten ethisch zu fundieren. Jedoch stoesst Bowies Position bei der Begruendung der ILO-Standards auch auf Grenzen, die nur teilweise mittels zusaetzlicher, mit der kantischen Stossrichtung vereinbarer Ideen erweitert werden koennen. So wird beispielsweise der republikanische Freiheitsbegriff Philip Pettits als Verfeinerung der teilweise problematischen Unterscheidung Bowies zwischen negativer und positiver Freiheit vorgeschlagen. Kritisch bleiben die Themen Schutz von Kindern, Nichtdiskriminierung und Gewerkschaften. Alles in allem liefert der Beitrag eine ganzheitliche und grundsaetzlich positive Antwort auf die Frage nach der Moeglichkeit einer kantischen Begruendung der ILO-Standards. (The article aims at exploring the normative basis of the International Labour Organization’s labour standards. Based on Norman E. Bowie’s Kantian perspective on Business Ethics the authors show that Bowie’s theoretical groundwork can in principle be used to ethically justify the four core areas of the ILO’s activities. However, they also discover the limitations of Bowie’s position which can only sometimes be overcome by additional concepts compatible with the overall Kantian thrust. For exam-ple, Philip Pettit’s conception of republican freedom is proposed as a refinement of Bowie’s partly problematic distinction between negative and positive freedom. There remain some critical aspects in the fields of protection of children, non-discrimination, and labour unions. All things combined the article provides an overall and cautiously affirmative picture concerning the possibility of grounding the ILO’s labour standards in Kantian concepts)

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/hampp_e-journals_zfwu.htm#212
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Rainer Hampp Verlag in its journal Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik.

    Volume (Year): 13 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 118-140

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:rai:ethics:doi_10.1688/1862-0043_zfwu_2012_02_baeumlisberger

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/

    Order Information:
    Postal: Rainer Hampp Verlag, Journals, Marktplatz 5, 86415 Mering, Germany
    Email:
    Web: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/hampp_e-journals_zfwu.htm

    Related research

    Keywords: International Labour Organization; Employee Rights; Immanuel Kant; Norman E. Bowie; John Rawls; Freedom of Association; Forced Labour; Child Labour;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rai:ethics:doi_10.1688/1862-0043_zfwu_2012_02_baeumlisberger. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rainer Hampp).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.