IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_2003_num_157_1_6890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts économiques d’une réduction des utilisations agricoles des engrais minéraux en France : une analyse en équilibre général

Author

Listed:
  • Fabrice Levert
  • Hervé Guyomard
  • Alexandre Gohin

Abstract

[fre] Nous évaluons les conséquences pour l’économie française de deux politiques de réduction des consommations agricoles des engrais minéraux, la taxation et le quota d’utilisation. Les deux politiques correspondent à une diminution de 15% des utilisations totales des engrais minéraux. Elles n’auraient que des effets limités sur les allocations de surfaces entre cultures et les offres des différentes productions agricoles. Les deux instruments conduiraient à une augmentation du bien-être marchand de l’économie française (environ 1,6 milliard de francs 1994). La politique de taxation aboutirait à une diminution de la valeur ajoutée agricole d’environ 2,5 milliards de francs 1994, alors que la politique de quotas librement échangeables permettrait un maintien au niveau initial (avec cependant des disparités entre secteurs agricoles). Les deux politiques permettraient d’obtenir un double dividende fort, i. e. une amélioration du bien-être privé de l’économie française et une réduction de la pollution. [eng] We evaluate the consequences for the French economy of two policies aimed at reducing agricultural consumption of mineral fertilisers : taxation and utilisation quotas. Both policies correspond to a diminution of 15% in total utilisation of mineral fertilisers. Both appear to have only limited effects on the allocation of land area between crops and on the supply of various types of agricultural produce. Both lead to an increase in market well-being for the French economy (of roughly 1.6 billion 1994 francs). But the policy based on taxation would lead to a decline in agricultural value-added of around 2.5 billion 1994 francs, whereas the policy based on freely tradable quotas would enable it to be maintained at its initial level, albeit with disparities between agricultural sectors. Both policies would make it possible to obtain a major double dividend, i. e. an improvement in private well-being for the French economy and a reduction in pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabrice Levert & Hervé Guyomard & Alexandre Gohin, 2003. "Impacts économiques d’une réduction des utilisations agricoles des engrais minéraux en France : une analyse en équilibre général," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 157(1), pages 13-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2003_num_157_1_6890
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.2003.6890
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.2003.6890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.2003.6890
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_2003_num_157_1_6890
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.2003.6890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Montgomery, W. David, 1972. "Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 395-418, December.
    2. Abler, David G & Shortle, James S, 1992. "Environmental and Farm Commodity Policy Linkages in the U.S. and the EC," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 19(2), pages 197-217.
    3. Rendleman, C. Matthew, 1991. "Agrichemical Reduction Policy: Its Effect on Income and Income Distribution," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 43(4), pages 1-5.
    4. Lawrence Goulder, 1995. "Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 2(2), pages 157-183, August.
    5. Roberto J. Garcia & Alan Randall, 1994. "A Cost Function Analysis to Estimate the Effects of Fertilizer Policy on the Supply of Wheat and Corn," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 16(2), pages 215-230.
    6. Pearce, David W, 1991. "The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 101(407), pages 938-948, July.
    7. Jean-Charles Hourcade & Frédéric Ghersi, 2000. "Le rôle du changement technique dans le double dividende d'écotaxes," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 143(2), pages 47-68.
    8. W. E. Diewert, 1981. "The Comparative Statics of Industry Long-Run Equilibrium," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 78-92, February.
    9. Chambers,Robert G., 1988. "Applied Production Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521314275.
    10. James S. Shortle & James W. Dunn, 1986. "The Relative Efficiency of Agricultural Source Water Pollution Control Policies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(3), pages 668-677.
    11. Mahé, Louis-Pascal & Rainelli, Pierre, 1987. "Impact des pratiques et des politiques agricoles sur l'environnement," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 4.
    12. Koopmans, Tom Th, 1987. "An Application of an Agro-economic Model to Environmental Issues in the EC: A Case Study," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 14(2), pages 147-159.
    13. Bonnieux, F & Rainelli, P, 1988. "Agricultural Policy and Environment in Developed Countries," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 15(2/3), pages 263-281.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amédée Mollard & Anne Lacroix & Gérard Drouet d’Aubigny & François Bel, 2004. "Efficacité et limites d’une taxe sur les engrais azotés : éléments d’analyse à partir de seize pays européens," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 166(5), pages 99-113.
    2. Rüdiger Parsche & Chang Woon Nam & Doina Radulescu & Manfred Schöpe & Doina Maria Radulescu, 2004. "Taxation of Agricultural Means of Production in Selected EU Partner Countries," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 20.
    3. Gohin, Alexandre, 2006. "Assessing the 2003 CAP Reform: Sensitivity to the Decoupling of Agenda 2000 Direct Payments," Working Papers 18868, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James Shortle & Richard D. Horan, 2017. "Nutrient Pollution: A Wicked Challenge for Economic Instruments," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 1-39, April.
    2. Emmanuel Combet & Frédéric Ghersi & Jean Charles Hourcade & Daniel Théry, 2010. "Carbon Tax and Equity : The Importance of Policy Design," Post-Print halshs-00692516, HAL.
    3. Claudia Kettner-Marx & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig, 2018. "Carbon Taxes from an Economic Perspective," WIFO Working Papers 554, WIFO.
    4. Stavins, Robert, 2004. "Environmental Economics," RFF Working Paper Series dp-04-54, Resources for the Future.
    5. Weber, Thomas A. & Neuhoff, Karsten, 2010. "Carbon markets and technological innovation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 115-132, September.
    6. Nils Ohlendorf & Michael Jakob & Jan Christoph Minx & Carsten Schröder & Jan Christoph Steckel, 2021. "Distributional Impacts of Carbon Pricing: A Meta-Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(1), pages 1-42, January.
    7. Frédéric Ghersi & Jean-Charles Hourcade & Philippe Quirion, 2001. "Marché international du carbone et double dividende : antinomie ou synergie," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 16(2), pages 149-177.
    8. Ditya Agung Nurdianto, 2016. "Economic Impacts of a Carbon Tax in an Integrated ASEAN," EEPSEA Special and Technical Paper tp201604t5, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Apr 2016.
    9. Sjak Smulders & Herman R. J. Vollebergh, 2001. "Green Taxes and Administrative Costs: The Case of Carbon Taxation," NBER Chapters, in: Behavioral and Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy, pages 91-130, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Dina Kassab, 2020. "Tax Exemptions of Ethical Products Revisited," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(2), pages 423-447, October.
    11. Quentin Perrier & Philippe Quirion, 2016. "La transition énergétique est-elle favorable aux branches à fort contenu en emploi ? Une approche input-output pour la France," Working Papers 2016.09, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    12. Saunders, Caroline M. & Roningen, Vernon O., 2001. "Trade And The Environment. Linking A Partial Equilibrium Trade Model With Production Systems And Their Environmental Consequences," 2001: International Trade in Livestock Products Symposium, January 2001, Auckland, New Zealand 14552, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    13. : Eduardo L. Giménez (a) & Miguel Rodríguez, "undated". "Pigou’S Dividend Versus Ramsey’S Dividend In The Double Dividend Literature," Working Papers 2-06 Classification-JEL :, Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
    14. Jenny Ligthart & Frederick Van Der Ploeg, 1999. "Environmental Policy, Tax Incidence, and the Cost of Public Funds," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 13(2), pages 187-207, March.
    15. Don Fullerton & Gilbert E. Metcalf, 2002. "Environmental Controls, Scarcity Rents, and Pre-existing Distortions," Chapters, in: Lawrence H. Goulder (ed.), Environmental Policy Making in Economies with Prior Tax Distortions, chapter 26, pages 504-522, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Catherine L. Kling, 2011. "Economic Incentives to Improve Water Quality in Agricultural Landscapes: Some New Variations on Old Ideas," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 93(2), pages 297-309.
    17. Markandya, Anil & González-Eguino, Mikel & Escapa, Marta, 2013. "From shadow to green: Linking environmental fiscal reforms and the informal economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(S1), pages 108-118.
    18. Abrahams, Nii Adote & Shortle, James S., 1997. "Uncertainty And The Regulation Of Nitrate Pollution From Agriculture," 1997 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Toronto, Canada 21027, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Coxhead, Ian, 2000. "Tax Reform and the Environment in Developing Economies: Is a Double Dividend Possible," Staff Paper Series 431, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    20. Hoel, Michael, 2008. "Environmental Taxes in an Economy with Distorting Taxes and a Heterogeneous Population," Memorandum 04/2008, Oslo University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2003_num_157_1_6890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.