IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_1990_num_96_5_5194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chocs pétroliers et industrie : apports récents de l'économétrie de la production

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Guy Devezeaux de Lavergne

Abstract

[spa] Crisis petroleras e industria : aportaciones recientes de la econometría de la producción, . Jean-Guy Devezeaux de Lavergne.. . El presente artículo tiene por objeto brindar al planificador una síntesis de los trabajos recientes en el campo del análisis de la demanda de energía, centrándose en el sector industrial francés según un método de inspiración neoclásica e identificando, en la medida de lo posible, las consecuencias complejas de un aumento del precio del crudo sobre la producción y la demanda de energía. Entre estas conclusiones cabe destacar la afirmación de que los efectos de una crisis petrolera de la misma importancia serían, actualmente, menos graves que después de las que se produjeron en1973 y 1979. [eng] Oil crises and Industry: Recent Contributions of Production Econometry, . by Jean-Guy Devezeaux de Lavergne.. . The purpose of this paper is to supply planners with a comparative summary of the findings of recent reports on energy demand, by focussing on the French industrial sector using a basically neo-classical approach and by determining the impact an increase in crude oil prices could have on both productivity and energy demand. One of the more noteworthy findings of this survey is that an oil crisis on the same scale as the crises experienced in the past would have a lesser effect now than was the case following the 1973 and 1979 crises. [fre] Chocs pétroliers et industrie : apports récents de l'économétrie de la production, . par Jean-Guy Devezeaux de Lavergne.. . L'ambition de cet article est de fournir au planificateur une synthèse des travaux récents dans le domaine de l'analyse de la demande d'énergie, en se focalisant sur le secteur industriel français suivant une approche d'essence néo-classique, et en identifiant, autant que faire se peut, les conséquences complexes d'une hausse du prix du brut sur la productivité et la demande d'énergie. L'une de ses conclusions les plus notables est qu'un choc pétrolier aurait maintenant, à ampleur égale, un effet moindre qu'après 1973 et 1979. [ger] Die Industrie und die Ölschocks: die jüngsten Beiträge der Produktionsökonometrie, . von Jean-Guy Devezeaux de Lavergne.. . Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, den Planern eine Synthese der jüngsten, im Bereich der Energiebedarfsanalyse vorgenommenen Arbeiten zu liefem, wobei unter Anwendung einer Méthode neoklassischer Art der Schwerpunkt auf dem französischen Industriesektor liegt und die komplexen Folgen einer Erhöhung des Rohölpreises auf die Produktivität und den Energiebedarf möglichst erschöpfend dargestellt werden. Eine der herausragendsten Schlußfolgerungen ist, daß ein Ölschock gleichen Ausmaßes heute geringere Auswirkungen hätte als nach 1973 und 1979.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Guy Devezeaux de Lavergne, 1990. "Chocs pétroliers et industrie : apports récents de l'économétrie de la production," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 96(5), pages 21-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1990_num_96_5_5194
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.1990.5194
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1990.5194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.1990.5194
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_1990_num_96_5_5194
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.1990.5194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Guy Devezeaux de Lavergne & Norbert Ladoux, 1989. "Demande de facteurs et productivité dans le long terme : l'apport des fonctions à capital quasi-fixe," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 91(5), pages 43-56.
    2. Nordhaus, William D., 1982. "Economic policy in the face of declining productivity growth," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 131-157.
    3. Fuss, Melvyn & McFadden, Daniel (ed.), 1978. "Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780444850133.
    4. D. W. Jorgenson & Z. Griliches, 1967. "The Explanation of Productivity Change," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 34(3), pages 249-283.
    5. Hulten, Charles R., 1986. "Productivity change, capacity utilization, and the sources of efficiency growth," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1-2), pages 31-50.
    6. Fuss, Melvyn & McFadden, Daniel, 1978. "Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications (II): Applications of the Theory of Production," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, volume 2, number fuss1978a.
    7. Turnovsky, Michelle & Folie, Michael & Ulph, Alistair, 1982. "Factor Substitutability in Australian Manufacturing with Emphasis on Energy Inputs," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 58(160), pages 61-72, March.
    8. Greenman, J. V. & Drollas, L. P., 1987. "The price of energy and factor substitution in the US economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 159-166, July.
    9. Berndt, Ernst R. & Fuss, Melvyn A., 1986. "Productivity measurement with adjustments for variations in capacity utilization and other forms of temporary equilibrium," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1-2), pages 7-29.
    10. Helliwell, John F. & MacGregor, Mary E. & McRae, Robert N. & Plourde, Andre & Chung, Alan, 1987. "Supply oriented macroeconomics : The MACE model of Canada," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 318-340, July.
    11. repec:adr:anecst:y:1986:i:4:p:01 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Struckmeyer, Charles S, 1987. "The Putty-Clay Perspective on the Capital-Energy Complementarity Debate," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 69(2), pages 320-326, May.
    13. Robert H. Rasche & John A. Tatom, 1977. "Energy resources and potential GNP," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 59(Jun), pages 10-24.
    14. Fuss, Melvyn, 1978. "Factor Substitution in Electricity Generation: A Test of the Putty-Clay Hypothesis," Histoy of Economic Thought Chapters, in: Fuss, Melvyn & McFadden, Daniel (ed.),Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, volume 2, chapter 7, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought.
    15. repec:adr:anecst:y:1990:i:17:p:05 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Alain Charmant & Jean Guy Devezeaux de Lavergne & Norbert Ladoux, 1990. "Énergie et productivité : un lien assez lâche," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 237(1), pages 121-133.
    17. Holly, Sean & Smith, Peter, 1989. "Interrelated factor demands for manufacturing: A dynamic translog cost function approach," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 111-126, January.
    18. Berndt, Ernst R & Wood, David O, 1986. "Energy Price Shocks and Productivity Growth in U.S. and UK Manufacturing," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 2(3), pages 1-31, Autumn.
    19. Griffin, James M & Gregory, Paul R, 1976. "An Intercountry Translog Model of Energy Substitution Responses," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 66(5), pages 845-857, December.
    20. Hesse, Dieter M & Tarkka, Helena, 1986. " The Demand for Capital, Labor and Energy in European Manufacturing Industry before and after the Oil Price Shocks," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(3), pages 529-546.
    21. Gilbert Cette & Daniel Szpiro, 1990. "L'influence de l'investissement sur la productivité via le progrès technique," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 237(1), pages 87-98.
    22. Solow, John L, 1987. "The Capital-Energy Complementarity Debate Revisited," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(4), pages 605-614, September.
    23. Fuss, Melvyn & McFadden, Daniel, 1978. "Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications (I): The Theory of Production," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, volume 1, number fuss1978.
    24. Jean-Claude Berthelemy & Jean-Guy Devezeaux De Lavergne & Robert Ladoux, 1986. "Une analyse de la dynamique des comportements de substitution de facteurs dans cinq branches de l' économie française," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 4, pages 3-22.
    25. Michelle Turnovsk & Michael Folie & Alistair Ulph, 1982. "Factor Substitutability in Australian Manufacturing with Emphasis on Energy Inputs," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 58(1), pages 61-72, March.
    26. Diewert, W. E., 1976. "Exact and superlative index numbers," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 115-145, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Managi, Shunsuke & Opaluch, James J. & Jin, Di & Grigalunas, Thomas A., 2006. "Stochastic frontier analysis of total factor productivity in the offshore oil and gas industry," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 204-215, November.
    2. Susanto Basu & John Fernald, 2001. "Why Is Productivity Procyclical? Why Do We Care?," NBER Chapters, in: New Developments in Productivity Analysis, pages 225-302, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Melvyn Fuss & Leonard Waverman, 1986. "The Canada-U.S. Auto Pact of 1965: An Experiment in Selective Trade Liberalization," NBER Working Papers 1953, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Kaustuva Barik, 2005. "Capacity Utilization in Indian Paper Industry," Microeconomics 0503001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Paul Schreyer & María Belén Zinni, 2021. "Productivity Measurement, R&D Assets, and Mark‐Ups in OECD Countries," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(4), pages 787-809, December.
    6. M. Ishaq Nadiri & Ingmar Prucha, 2001. "Dynamic Factor Demand Models and Productivity Analysis," NBER Chapters, in: New Developments in Productivity Analysis, pages 103-172, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Melvyn A. Fuss & Leonard Waverman, 1986. "The Extent and Sources of Cost and Efficiency Differences Between U.S. and Japanese Automobile Producers," NBER Working Papers 1849, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Koschel, Henrike, 2000. "Substitution elasticities between capital, labour, material, electricity and fossil fuels in German producing and service sectors," ZEW Discussion Papers 00-31, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Koetse, Mark J. & de Groot, Henri L.F. & Florax, Raymond J.G.M., 2008. "Capital-energy substitution and shifts in factor demand: A meta-analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 2236-2251, September.
    10. Deb Kusum Das, 2003. "Manufacturing productivity under varying trade regmies: India in the 1980s and 1990s," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 107, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    11. Førsund, Finn R. & Hjalmarsson, Lennart, 2008. "Dynamic Analysis of Structural Change and Productivity Measurement," Memorandum 27/2008, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    12. Vlachou, Andriana & Vassos, Spyros & Andrikopoulos, Andreas, 1996. "Energy and environment: Reducing CO2 emissions from the electric power industry," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 343-376, August.
    13. Victor Aguirregabiria & Margaret Slade, 2017. "Empirical models of firms and industries," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(5), pages 1445-1488, December.
    14. Bruno De Borger & Kristiaan Kerstens & Diego Prior & Ignace Van de Woestyne, 2013. "Static efficiency decompositions and capacity utilization: integrating economic and technical capacity notions," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(24), pages 3529-3529, August.
    15. Shelby Gerking, 1993. "Measuring Productivity Growth in U.S. Regions: A Survey," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 16(1-2), pages 155-185, April.
    16. Jean‐Christophe Bureau & Rolf Färe & Shawna Grosskopf, 1995. "A Comparison Of Three Nonparametric Measures Of Productivity Growth In European And United States Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 309-326, September.
    17. Ali, Mubarik & Byerlee, Derek, 2000. "Productivity growth and resource degradation in Pakistan's Punjab - a decomposition analysis," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2480, The World Bank.
    18. Georg Erber ; Alfred Haid, 1991. "Total Factor Productivity in the Federal Republic of Germany (1970- 1989): Results for Mining and Manufacturing Industries," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 33, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    19. W. Erwin Diewert, 1980. "Aggregation Problems in the Measurement of Capital," NBER Chapters, in: The Measurement of Capital, pages 433-538, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. J. Peter Neary, 2004. "Rationalizing the Penn World Table: True Multilateral Indices for International Comparisons of Real Income," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(5), pages 1411-1428, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1990_num_96_5_5194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.