IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0231554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupant-centered optimization framework to evaluate and design new dynamic shading typologies

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Charpentier
  • Forrest Meggers
  • Sigrid Adriaenssens
  • Olivier Baverel

Abstract

Dynamic solar shading has the potential to dramatically reduce the energy consumption in buildings while at the same time improving the thermal and visual comfort of its occupants. Many new typologies of shading systems that have appeared recently, but it is difficult to compare those new systems to existing typologies due to control algorithm being rule-based as opposed to performance driven. Since solar shading is a design problem, there is no single right answer. What is the metric to determine if a system has reached its optimal kinematic design? Shading solutions should come from a thorough iterative and comparative process. This paper provides an original and flexible framework for the design and performance optimization of dynamic shading systems based on interpolation of simulations and global minimization. The methodology departs from existing rule-based strategies and applies to existing and to complex shading systems with multiple degree-of-freedom mobility. The strategy for control is centered on meeting comfort targets for work plane illuminance while minimizing the energy needed to operate space. The energy demand for thermal comfort and work plane daylight quantity (illuminance) are evaluated with Radiance and EnergyPlus based on local weather data. Applied to a case study of three typologies of dynamic shading, the results of the methodology inform the usefulness and quality of each degree-of-freedom of the kinematic systems. The case study exemplifies the iterative benefits of the methodology by providing detailed analytics on the behavior of the shades. Designers of shading systems can use this framework to evaluate their design and compare them to existing shading systems. This allows creativity to be guided so that eventually building occupants benefit from the innovation in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Charpentier & Forrest Meggers & Sigrid Adriaenssens & Olivier Baverel, 2020. "Occupant-centered optimization framework to evaluate and design new dynamic shading typologies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231554
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231554
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231554&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0231554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delgarm, N. & Sajadi, B. & Kowsary, F. & Delgarm, S., 2016. "Multi-objective optimization of the building energy performance: A simulation-based approach by means of particle swarm optimization (PSO)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 293-303.
    2. Khoroshiltseva, Marina & Slanzi, Debora & Poli, Irene, 2016. "A Pareto-based multi-objective optimization algorithm to design energy-efficient shading devices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1400-1410.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schito, Eva & Conti, Paolo & Testi, Daniele, 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of microclimate in museums for concurrent reduction of energy needs, visitors’ discomfort and artwork preservation risks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 147-159.
    2. Rudai Shan & Lars Junghans, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimization for High-Performance Building Facade Design: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-33, November.
    3. Huang, Junchao & Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Zhang, Weilong, 2018. "Numerical investigation of a novel vacuum photovoltaic curtain wall and integrated optimization of photovoltaic envelope systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1048-1060.
    4. Shaoxiong Li & Le Liu & Changhai Peng, 2020. "A Review of Performance-Oriented Architectural Design and Optimization in the Context of Sustainability: Dividends and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-36, February.
    5. de Almeida Rocha, Ana Paula & Reynoso-Meza, Gilberto & Oliveira, Ricardo C.L.F. & Mendes, Nathan, 2020. "A pixel counting based method for designing shading devices in buildings considering energy efficiency, daylight use and fading protection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    6. Yibing Xue & Wenhan Liu, 2022. "A Study on Parametric Design Method for Optimization of Daylight in Commercial Building’s Atrium in Cold Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Abdelhakim Mesloub & Aritra Ghosh & Mabrouk Touahmia & Ghazy Abdullah Albaqawy & Emad Noaime & Badr M. Alsolami, 2020. "Performance Analysis of Photovoltaic Integrated Shading Devices (PVSDs) and Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic (STPV) Devices Retrofitted to a Prototype Office Building in a Hot Desert Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Saurbayeva, Assemgul & Memon, Shazim Ali & Kim, Jong, 2023. "Integrated multi-stage sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization approach for PCM integrated residential buildings in different climate zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(PB).
    9. Roth, Jonathan & Martin, Amory & Miller, Clayton & Jain, Rishee K., 2020. "SynCity: Using open data to create a synthetic city of hourly building energy estimates by integrating data-driven and physics-based methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    10. Niemelä, Tuomo & Kosonen, Risto & Jokisalo, Juha, 2016. "Cost-optimal energy performance renovation measures of educational buildings in cold climate," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1005-1020.
    11. Liang, Xinbin & Liu, Zhuoxuan & Wang, Jie & Jin, Xinqiao & Du, Zhimin, 2023. "Uncertainty quantification-based robust deep learning for building energy systems considering distribution shift problem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    12. Taveres-Cachat, Ellika & Lobaccaro, Gabriele & Goia, Francesco & Chaudhary, Gaurav, 2019. "A methodology to improve the performance of PV integrated shading devices using multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 731-744.
    13. Liang, Xinbin & Zhu, Xu & Chen, Siliang & Jin, Xinqiao & Xiao, Fu & Du, Zhimin, 2023. "Physics-constrained cooperative learning-based reference models for smart management of chillers considering extrapolation scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    14. Bingham, Raymond D. & Agelin-Chaab, Martin & Rosen, Marc A., 2019. "Whole building optimization of a residential home with PV and battery storage in The Bahamas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1088-1103.
    15. García Kerdan, Iván & Raslan, Rokia & Ruyssevelt, Paul & Morillón Gálvez, David, 2017. "A comparison of an energy/economic-based against an exergoeconomic-based multi-objective optimisation for low carbon building energy design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 244-263.
    16. Lee, Junghun & Kim, Jeonggook & Song, Doosam & Kim, Jonghun & Jang, Cheolyong, 2017. "Impact of external insulation and internal thermal density upon energy consumption of buildings in a temperate climate with four distinct seasons," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1081-1088.
    17. Liu, Baonan & Zhou, Jianzhong & Xu, Yanhe & Lai, Xinjie & Shi, Yousong & Li, Mengyao, 2022. "An optimization decision-making framework for the optimal operation strategy of pumped storage hydropower system under extreme conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 254-273.
    18. Younhee Choi & Doosam Song & Sungmin Yoon & Junemo Koo, 2021. "Comparison of Factorial and Latin Hypercube Sampling Designs for Meta-Models of Building Heating and Cooling Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Fu, Yelin & Lai, Kin Keung & Yu, Lean, 2021. "Multi-nation comparisons of energy architecture performance: A group decision-making method with preference structure and acceptability analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Rabani, Mehrdad & Bayera Madessa, Habtamu & Mohseni, Omid & Nord, Natasa, 2020. "Minimizing delivered energy and life cycle cost using Graphical script: An office building retrofitting case," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.