IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0225693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A leader-follower model for discrete competitive facility location problem under the partially proportional rule with a threshold

Author

Listed:
  • Wuyang Yu

Abstract

When consumers are faced with the choice of competitive chain facilities that offer exclusive services, current rules do not properly describe the behavior pattern of these consumers. To eliminate the gap between the current rules and this kind of customers behavior pattern, the partially proportional rule with a threshold is proposed in this paper. A leader-follower model for discrete competitive facility location problem is established under the partially proportional rule with a threshold. Combining with the greedy strategy and the 2-opt strategy, a heuristical algorithm (GFA) is designed to solve the follower’s problem. By embedding the algorithm (GFA), an improved ranking-based algorithm (IRGA) is proposed to solve the leader-follower model. Numerical tests show that the algorithm proposed in this paper can solve the leader-follower model for discrete competitive facility location problem effectively. The effects of different parameters on the market share captured by the leader firm and the follower firm are analyzed in detail using a quasi-real example. An interesting finding is that in some cases the leader firm does not have a first-mover advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Wuyang Yu, 2019. "A leader-follower model for discrete competitive facility location problem under the partially proportional rule with a threshold," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0225693
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0225693
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0225693&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0225693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Ying & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Ralphs, Ted K. & Xue, Zhaojie, 2016. "The competitive facility location problem under disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 453-473.
    2. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner, 2004. "Finding the optimal solution to the Huff based competitive location model," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 193-208, July.
    3. Fernández, José & Hendrix, Eligius M.T., 2013. "Recent insights in Huff-like competitive facility location and design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 581-584.
    4. Casas-Ramírez, Martha-Selene & Camacho-Vallejo, José-Fernando & Martínez-Salazar, Iris-Abril, 2018. "Approximating solutions to a bilevel capacitated facility location problem with customer's patronization toward a list of preferences," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 369-386.
    5. Peter Peeters & Frank Plastria, 1998. "Discretization results for the Huff and Pareto-Huff competitive location models on networks," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 6(2), pages 247-260, December.
    6. ReVelle, C.S. & Eiselt, H.A. & Daskin, M.S., 2008. "A bibliography for some fundamental problem categories in discrete location science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 817-848, February.
    7. Daniel Serra & Rosa Colomé, 2001. "articles: Consumer choice and optimal locations models: Formulations and heuristics," Papers in Regional Science, Springer;Regional Science Association International, vol. 80(4), pages 439-464.
    8. Plastria, Frank, 2001. "Static competitive facility location: An overview of optimisation approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(3), pages 461-470, March.
    9. Timothy J. Gilbride & Greg M. Allenby, 2004. "A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 391-406, October.
    10. R. Suárez-Vega & D. Santos-Peñate & P. Dorta-González, 2004. "Discretization and resolution of the (r|X p )-medianoid problem involving quality criteria," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 12(1), pages 111-133, June.
    11. Kung, Ling-Chieh & Liao, Wei-Hung, 2018. "An approximation algorithm for a competitive facility location problem with network effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 176-186.
    12. Rafael Suárez‐Vega & Dolores R. Santos‐Peñate & Pablo Dorta‐González, 2007. "The follower location problem with attraction thresholds," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(1), pages 123-137, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blas Pelegrín & Pascual Fernández & María Dolores García Pérez, 2016. "Profit maximization and reduction of the cannibalization effect in chain expansion," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 57-75, November.
    2. Kress, Dominik & Pesch, Erwin, 2012. "Sequential competitive location on networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 483-499.
    3. Haase, Knut & Hoppe, Mirko, 2008. "Standortplanung unter Wettbewerb - Teil 1: Grundlagen," Discussion Papers 2/2008, Technische Universität Dresden, "Friedrich List" Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, Institute of Transport and Economics.
    4. Gunhak Lee & Morton E. O'Kelly, 2009. "Exploring Locational Equilibria In A Competitive Broadband Access Market: Theoretical Modeling Approach," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5), pages 953-975, December.
    5. José Fernández & Blas Pelegrín & Frank Plastria & Boglárka Tóth, 2007. "Planar Location and Design of a New Facility with Inner and Outer Competition: An Interval Lexicographical-like Solution Procedure," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 19-44, March.
    6. Rafael Suárez‐Vega & Dolores R. Santos‐Peñate & Pablo Dorta‐González, 2004. "Competitive Multifacility Location on Networks: the (r∣Xp)‐Medianoid Problem," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 569-588, August.
    7. Blas Pelegrín & Rafael Suárez-Vega & Saúl Cano, 2012. "Isodistant points in competitive network facility location," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(3), pages 639-660, October.
    8. Xiang Li & Tianyu Zhang & Liang Wang & Hongguang Ma & Xiande Zhao, 2022. "A minimax regret model for the leader–follower facility location problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(2), pages 861-882, February.
    9. Burcin Bozkaya & Seda Yanik & Selim Balcisoy, 2010. "A GIS-Based Optimization Framework for Competitive Multi-Facility Location-Routing Problem," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 297-320, September.
    10. Rafael Blanquero & Emilio Carrizosa & Amaya Nogales-Gómez & Frank Plastria, 2014. "Single-facility huff location problems on networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 175-195, November.
    11. Rafael Suárez-Vega & Dolores Santos-Peñate & Pablo Dorta-González, 2014. "Location and quality selection for new facilities on a network market," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 52(2), pages 537-560, March.
    12. Blanquero, Rafael & Carrizosa, Emilio & G.-Tóth, Boglárka & Nogales-Gómez, Amaya, 2016. "p-facility Huff location problem on networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(1), pages 34-42.
    13. Tammy Drezner, 2011. "Cannibalization in a Competitive Environment," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 34(3), pages 306-322, July.
    14. Pelegrín, Blas & Fernández, Pascual & García Pérez, María Dolores, 2015. "On tie breaking in competitive location under binary customer behavior," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 156-167.
    15. Tammy Drezner & Morton O’Kelly & Zvi Drezner, 2023. "Multipurpose shopping trips and location," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 191-208, February.
    16. Wenxuan Shan & Qianqian Yan & Chao Chen & Mengjie Zhang & Baozhen Yao & Xuemei Fu, 2019. "Optimization of competitive facility location for chain stores," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 187-205, February.
    17. Tammy Drezner, 2009. "Location of retail facilities under conditions of uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 107-120, March.
    18. Bojesen, M. & Birkin, M. & Clarke, G., 2014. "Spatial competition for biogas production using insights from retail location models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 617-628.
    19. Derya Celik Turkoglu & Mujde Erol Genevois, 2020. "A comparative survey of service facility location problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 399-468, September.
    20. Hyowon Kim & Dong Soo Kim & Greg M. Allenby, 2020. "Benefit Formation and Enhancement," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 419-468, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0225693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.