IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/osi/bulimm/v21y2021p167-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Taxonomy For Interorganizational Production Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Freichel

    (University of Würzburg – Chair of Business Management and Information Systems, Germany)

  • Nicolas Neis

    (University of Würzburg – Chair of Business Management and Information Systems, Germany)

  • Axel Winkelmann

    (University of Würzburg – Chair of Business Management and Information Systems, Germany)

Abstract

Manufacturing industries are facing increasing customer demands, dynamic markets, and high cost pressure. Digital innovations increasingly empower the implementation of interorganizational production networks that contribute to achieving goals, such as reducing order risks and maintaining flexibility as well as speed of reaction by utilizing synergy potentials. Additionally, trends like Industry 4.0 or Sharing Economy require innovative, adaptive, and resilient institutional arrangements. The description and design of these networks represent a significant challenge, since production networks in and between many companies have been established over the last decades, in most instances historically grown without being explicitly planned. We aim to develop a classification using a conceptual approach based on a structured literature analysis with an initial focus on interorganizational production networks. Within a hierarchical framework, we first classify types of collaboration between organizations. We analyze the purpose as well as the structure of interorganizational production networks by developing a taxonomy. To exemplary show the successful application, a typology is developed by assigning selected dimensions to the most common types of interorganizational networks. This study’s results are a first step towards supporting companies in planning new production networks when evaluating a suitable form of collaboration. Within further research, the taxonomy should be evaluated with real-world scenarios. The robustness of the taxonomy should be tested in a broader range of industries. Based on this taxonomy, it could be examined whether there are similarities in the strategies for adopting specific structural forms to achieve certain purposes. By using the taxonomy, concrete recommendations for action regarding digital innovations to support and enhance production networks, e. g. platforms for sharing manufacturing capacities, can be derived.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Freichel & Nicolas Neis & Axel Winkelmann, 2021. "A Taxonomy For Interorganizational Production Networks," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 21, pages 167-187.
  • Handle: RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:21:y:2021:p:167-187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.efos.unios.hr/repec/osi/bulimm/PDF/BusinessLogisticsinModernManagement21/blimm2110.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce Kogut, 1988. "Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(4), pages 319-332, July.
    2. Rudberg, Martin & Olhager, Jan, 2003. "Manufacturing networks and supply chains: an operations strategy perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 29-39, February.
    3. Timothy J. Sturgeon, 2002. "Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(3), pages 451-496, June.
    4. Stanislao Gualdi & Antoine Mandel, 2019. "Endogenous growth in production networks," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 91-117, March.
    5. Dariusz Nowak, 2017. "Determinants Of The Development Of Inter-Organizational Relations," Business Management, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 3 Year 20, pages 25-45.
    6. Gene M. Grossman & Esteban Rossi-Hansberg, 2008. "Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1978-1997, December.
    7. Chen Liu, 2017. "International Competitiveness and the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 5(4), pages 111-133.
    8. Sun, Jing & Yamamoto, Hisashi & Matsui, Masayuki, 2020. "Horizontal integration management: An optimal switching model for parallel production system with multiple periods in smart supply chain environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    9. Jiewu Leng & Pingyu Jiang, 2018. "Evaluation across and within collaborative manufacturing networks: a comparison of manufacturers’ interactions and attributes," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(15), pages 5131-5146, August.
    10. Jan Olhager & Andreas Feldmann, 2018. "Distribution of manufacturing strategy decision-making in multi-plant networks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(1-2), pages 692-708, January.
    11. Ngniatedema, Thomas & Shanker, Murali & Hu, Michael Y. & Guiffrida, Alfred L. & Eddy Patuwo, B., 2015. "Late customization strategy with service levels requirements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 72-84.
    12. Tuma, A., 1998. "Configuration and coordination of virtual production networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 641-648, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodríguez Monroy, Carlos & Vilana Arto, José Ramón, 2010. "Analysis of global manufacturing virtual networks in the aeronautical industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 314-323, August.
    2. Anna Giunta & Domenico Scalera & Francesco Trivieri & Jeffrey B. Nugent & Mariarosaria Agostino, 2011. "Firm Productivity, Organizational Choice and Global Value Chain," Working Papers 2011R09, Orkestra - Basque Institute of Competitiveness.
    3. Henry Wai-chung Yeung & Neil M. Coe, 2015. "Toward a Dynamic Theory of Global Production Networks," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 91(1), pages 29-58, January.
    4. McWilliam, Sarah E. & Kim, Jung Kwan & Mudambi, Ram & Nielsen, Bo Bernhard, 2020. "Global value chain governance: Intersections with international business," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(4).
    5. Mohammed BELAL UDDIN, 2017. "Evaluation Of Theoretical Paradigms Of Interfirm Relationship Formation," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 106-114, May.
    6. Emanuele Brancati & Raffaele Brancati & Andrea Maresca, 2017. "Global value chains, innovation and performance: firm-level evidence from the Great Recession," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(5), pages 1039-1073.
    7. Kwok Tong Soo, 2014. "The gains from trade in intermediate goods," Working Papers 63719205, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    8. Wenjie Chen & Fariha Kamal, 2016. "The impact of information and communication technology adoption on multinational firm boundary decisions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 47(5), pages 563-576, June.
    9. Julien Gooris, 2013. "The impact of host-country environment and home-host country distance on the configuration of international service activities," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/209404, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Goswami, Arti Grover, 2013. "Vertical FDI versus outsourcing: The role of technology transfer costs," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-21.
    11. Mark P. Dallas, 2015. "'Governed' trade: global value chains, firms, and the heterogeneity of trade in an era of fragmented production," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 875-909, October.
    12. Soo, Kwok Tong, 2018. "The gains from trade in intermediate goods: A Ricardo-Sraffa-Samuelson model," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 244-261.
    13. Jovanović, Miroslav N., 2019. "The Supply Chain Economy: How Far does it Spread in Space and Time?," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 72(4), pages 393-452.
    14. Sakakibara, Mariko, 1997. "Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 447-473, December.
    15. Krickx, Guido A., 1995. "Vertical integration in the computer mainframe industry: A transaction cost interpretation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 75-91, January.
    16. Jan Fagerberg & Bengt-Åke Lundvall & Martin Srholec, 2018. "Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(3), pages 533-556, July.
    17. M. Magnani, 2009. "Labor share dynamics: a survey of the theory," Economics Department Working Papers 2009-EP07, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    18. Saygılı, Hülya, 2017. "Production fragmentation and factor price convergence," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 535-544.
    19. Joseph Francois & Bernard Hoekman, 2010. "Services Trade and Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(3), pages 642-692, September.
    20. Boddin, Dominik & Henze, Philipp, 2015. "International trade and the occupational mix in manufacturing: Evidence from german micro data," Economics Working Papers 2015-05, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:bulimm:v:21:y:2021:p:167-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Davor Dujak,PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.