IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2018i2p170-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Overview Of The European Union Resilience Capacity: Scientific Limits And Methodological Aspects Related To Its Measurement

Author

Listed:
  • Ramona Țigănașu

    (Centre for European Studies, Faculty of Law, ”Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

Over the last decade, the measures implemented to ensure development at European Union (EU) level were taken from the need to provide a stronger resilience capacity in order to respond adequately to various internal or external shocks that may occur and affect the economies. In the current globalised era, a shock is created, for example, on labour markets, which are facing new vulnerabilities like the volatility generated by the ’instant changes’. A disparate policy or a sectorial crisis could induce major consequences like migration waves or unemployment, simultaneously influencing more countries and regions at the same time. Considering these aspects, the purpose of this paper is to outline both the main scientific limits related to resilience concept and the methodological approach of measuring the resilience capacity of EU countries from a multi-dimensional perspective. Studying the assessment of resilience involves answers to questions such as: The EU as a whole experienced a progress in terms of resilience (the capacity to absorb shocks, to resist, to adapt and to transform), especially after the onset of the financial crisis from 2007-2009? What countries of the EU have the capacity to resist better to shocks or mitigate some turbulences? The crisis represented for some countries a new start for macroeconomic recovery? The eastern countries may recover the development gaps faster than the western ones? To what extent these states have the ability to integrate into their development models elements of adaptability/reaction? To what directions they should orient the resources? The countries may respond differently to these challenges, depending on their resistance status? An analysis based on resilience capacity from a multi-disciplinary perspective should provide a system-wide evaluation of the current situation in the EU, defined by political and economic crises, the globalisation effects, and the structural changes in the society. Importantly, the need for studying the resilience capacity also stems from the on-going search for reliable adaptability to a changing geopolitical environment. In addition, it can help identifying vulnerabilities in relation to various types of shocks and to propose appropriate measures to increase resilience capacity and speed up eastern economies’ convergence process to EU standards. Particularly, the resilience approach can capture the weaknesses of the systems characterised by instability, insecurity, institutional weaknesses and structural fragilities, as well as inefficient governance. It can, thus, offer a scientific basis for the design of public policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramona Țigănașu, 2018. "An Overview Of The European Union Resilience Capacity: Scientific Limits And Methodological Aspects Related To Its Measurement," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 170-181, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2018:i:2:p:170-181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2018/n2/16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jack Boorman & José Fajgenbaum & Hervé Ferhani & Manu Bhaskaran & Drew Arnold & Harpaul Alberto Kohli, 2013. "The Centennial Resilience Index: Measuring Countries' Resilience to Shock," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 5(2), pages 57-98, May.
    2. Ron Boschma, 2015. "Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 733-751, May.
    3. Gillian Bristow & Adrian Healy, 2014. "Regional Resilience: An Agency Perspective," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 923-935, May.
    4. Neyapti, Bilin, 2013. "Modeling institutional evolution," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-16.
    5. Law, Siong Hook & Lim, Thong Cheen & Ismail, Normaz Wana, 2013. "Institutions and economic development: A Granger causality analysis of panel data evidence," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 610-624.
    6. Marco Modica & Aura Reggiani, 2015. "Spatial Economic Resilience: Overview and Perspectives," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 211-233, June.
    7. Efendic, Adnan & Pugh, Geoff & Adnett, Nick, 2011. "Institutions and economic performance: A meta-regression analysis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 586-599, September.
    8. Lino Briguglio & Gordon Cordina & Nadia Farrugia & Stephanie Vella, 2009. "Economic Vulnerability and Resilience: Concepts and Measurements," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 229-247.
    9. Marianne Sensier & Gillian Bristow & Adrian Healy, 2016. "Measuring Regional Economic Resilience across Europe: Operationalizing a complex concept," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 128-151, June.
    10. Baliamoune-Lutz, Mina, 2011. "Trust-based social capital, institutions, and development," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 335-346, August.
    11. Romain Duval & Lukas Vogel, 2008. "Economic resilience to shocks: The role of structural policies," OECD Journal: Economic Studies, OECD Publishing, vol. 2008(1), pages 1-38.
    12. Christophe Béné & Andrew Newsham & Mark Davies & Martina Ulrichs & Rachel Godfrey‐Wood, 2014. "Review Article: Resilience, Poverty And Development," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(5), pages 598-623, July.
    13. Robert Huggins & Piers Thompson, 2015. "Local entrepreneurial resilience and culture: the role of social values in fostering economic recovery," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(2), pages 313-330.
    14. Siddiqui, Danish Ahmed & Ahmed, Qazi Masood, 2013. "The effect of institutions on economic growth: A global analysis based on GMM dynamic panel estimation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 18-33.
    15. World Bank, 2014. "The World Bank Annual Report 2014 [Informe anual 2014 del Banco Mundial]," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 20093, December.
    16. Putterman, Louis, 2013. "Institutions, social capability, and economic growth," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 345-353.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pontarollo, Nicola & Serpieri, Carolina, 2020. "A composite policy tool to measure territorial resilience capacity," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Lucia Alessi & Peter Benczur & Francesca Campolongo & Jessica Cariboni & Anna Rita Manca & Balint Menyhert & Andrea Pagano, 2020. "The Resilience of EU Member States to the Financial and Economic Crisis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 569-598, April.
    3. Vinko Muštra & Blanka Šimundić & Zvonimir Kuliš, 2020. "Does innovation matter for regional labour resilience? The case of EU regions," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 955-970, October.
    4. Giulio Cainelli & Roberto Ganau & Marco Modica, 2019. "Does related variety affect regional resilience? New evidence from Italy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 62(3), pages 657-680, June.
    5. Xin Mai & Roger C. K. Chan & Chaoqun Zhan, 2019. "Which Sectors Really Matter for a Resilient Chinese Economy? A Structural Decomposition Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Riccardo Cappelli & Fabio Montobbio & Andrea Morrison, 2021. "Unemployment resistance across EU regions: the role of technological and human capital," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 147-178, January.
    7. Batabyal, Amitrajeet & Kourtit, Karima, 2021. "An Analysis of Resilience in Complex Socioeconomic Systems," MPRA Paper 105197, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Jan 2021.
    8. Annarelli, Alessandro & Nonino, Fabio, 2016. "Strategic and operational management of organizational resilience: Current state of research and future directions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-18.
    9. Nishi, Hiroshi, 2022. "Industrial sources and unevenness of regional employment resilience in Japan," MPRA Paper 113530, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Sébastien BOURDIN, 2018. "Géographie de la résilience des régions européennes face à la crise (2008-2013)," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 48, pages 53-70.
    11. A D Adom, 2016. "Resilience of developing countries to shocks: Case study of WAEMU countries with SUR and VAR Approaches," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 21(2), pages 105-138, September.
    12. Kurikka, Heli & Grillitsch, Markus, 2020. "Resilience in the periphery: What an agency perspective can bring to the table," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/7, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    13. Paolo Rizzi & Paola Graziano & Antonio Dallara, 2018. "A capacity approach to territorial resilience: the case of European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(2), pages 285-328, March.
    14. Ifrim, Mihaela & Lazorec, Maria & Pintilescu, Carmen, 2022. "Assessing the economic resilience in central and eastern EU countries. A multidimensional approach," MPRA Paper 117912, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Fabio Mazzola & Iolanda Cascio & Rosalia Epifanio & Giuseppe Giacomo, 2018. "Territorial capital and growth over the Great Recession: a local analysis for Italy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(2), pages 411-441, March.
    16. Farzaneh KHALILI & Majid AFSHARIRAD & Abdolrahim HASHEMI DIZAJ & Mehdi YAZDANSHENAS BAHOGHOGH, 2021. "Spatial Linkage Between Quality Of Institution, Natural Resources Management With Gdp Per Capita In D8 Countries (Durbin Model In Panel Data)," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 239-256, June.
    17. Xin Mai & Roger C. K. Chan, 2020. "Detecting the intellectual pathway of resilience thinking in urban and regional studies: A critical reflection on resilience literature," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 876-889, September.
    18. Guandong Song & Sheng Zhong & Liuguang Song, 2022. "Spatial Pattern Evolution Characteristics and Influencing Factors in County Economic Resilience in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    19. Guiling Wang & Mengzhuo Zhang & Yimeng Liu & Li Zhou & Yuxin Xia, 2023. "The Green and Adaptable Development Paths of Provincial Characteristic Towns in Taihu Lake Basin: A Synergy Perspective on Face Value and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Filippo Di Pietro & Patrizio Lecca & Simone Salotti, 2021. "Regional economic resilience in the European Union: a numerical general equilibrium analysis," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 287-312, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EU’s resilience capacity; scientific limits; methodological aspects; integrative approach.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
    • R10 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2018:i:2:p:170-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.