IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/bmsmti/v9y2018i1p84-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Strategy Management and Balanced Scorecard on Organizational Performance of UAE Civil Defense

Author

Listed:
  • Saif Hassan Ali Alzaabi
  • Hassan Al-Dhaafri

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of Strategy Management (ST) and Balanced Scorecard (BSC) on Organizational Performance (OP). Based on a theoretical foundation and a wide review of the literature, the model of the research was proposed. 220 Questionnaires were distributed among random selected sample of Civil Defense departments in the Northern Emirates. 188 questionnaires were returned and used in the analysis using the PLS-SEM. The results of this study demonstrate that Strategy Management and Balanced Scorecard have positive and significant effect on Organizational Performance. This study reflects the importance of the right implementation to the strategy management and BSC to have successful performance. This study also supported the premises of the resource-based view theory by reaffirming the importance of the Strategy Management and BSC as drivers to enhance organizational performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Saif Hassan Ali Alzaabi & Hassan Al-Dhaafri, 2018. "The Effect of Strategy Management and Balanced Scorecard on Organizational Performance of UAE Civil Defense," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 84-104, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:bmsmti:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:84-104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms/article/download/13112/10365
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms/article/view/13112
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Osterman, 1994. "How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts it?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 47(2), pages 173-188, January.
    2. Lipe, Marlys Gascho & Salterio, Steven, 2002. "A note on the judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard's information organization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 531-540, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amir Hamad Salim Binnashira Alketbi & Juan Antonio Jimber del Rio & Alberto Ibáñez Fernández, 2022. "Exploring the role of human resource development functions on crisis management: The case of Dubai-UAE during Covid-19 crisis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alba Manresa & Andrea Bikfalvi & Alexandra Simon, 2018. "The Use And Determinants Of Training And Development For Creativity And Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-28, October.
    2. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Philippe Askenazy & Eve Caroli, 2006. "Innovative work practices, information technologies and working conditions: evidence for France," EconomiX Working Papers 2006-2, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    4. Eguchi, Kyota, 2004. "Trainers' dilemma of choosing between training and promotion," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 765-783, December.
    5. Boucekkine, Raouf & Crifo, Patricia, 2008. "Human Capital Accumulation And The Transition From Specialization To Multitasking," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 320-344, June.
    6. İ. Akçomak & Lex Borghans & Bas Weel, 2011. "Measuring and Interpreting Trends in the Division of Labour in the Netherlands," De Economist, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 435-482, December.
    7. Nicholas Bloom & Renata Lemos & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2020. "Healthy Business? Managerial Education and Management in Health Care," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(3), pages 506-517, July.
    8. Derek C. Jones & Takao Kato, 2011. "The Impact of Teams on Output, Quality, and Downtime: An Empirical Analysis Using Individual Panel Data," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 64(2), pages 215-240, January.
    9. Wynder, Monte, 2010. "Chemico: Evaluating performance based on the Balanced Scorecard," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 221-236.
    10. Katsuya Takii, 2004. "The Value of Adaptability," Industrial Organization 0406004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Hoque, Zahirul, 2014. "20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-59.
    12. Cecilia Garcia-Penalosa & Eve Caroli & Philippe Aghion, 1999. "Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 37(4), pages 1615-1660, December.
    13. Caroli, Eve & Greenan, Nathalie & Guellec, Dominique, 2001. "Organizational Change and Skill Accumulation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 10(2), pages 481-506, June.
    14. Sandra E. Black & Lisa M. Lynch, 2001. "How To Compete: The Impact Of Workplace Practices And Information Technology On Productivity," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 83(3), pages 434-445, August.
    15. Simon Eisele & Martin R. Schneider, 2020. "What Do Unions Do to Work Design? Computer Use, Union Presence, and Tayloristic Jobs in Britain," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 604-626, October.
    16. Michael J. Handel & Maury Gittleman, 1999. "Is There a Wage Payoff to Innovative Work Practices?," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_288, Levy Economics Institute.
    17. Avner Ben-Ner & Fanmin Kong & Stephanie Lluis, "undated". "Uncertainty and Organization Design," Working Papers 0107, Human Resources and Labor Studies, University of Minnesota (Twin Cities Campus).
    18. Sandra E. Black & Lisa Lynch & Anya Krivelyova, 2003. "How Workers Fare When Employers Innovate," NBER Working Papers 9569, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Radoslava Nikolova, 2005. "Mutual Monitoring versus Incentive Pay in Teams," Working Papers 2005-39, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    20. Nicholas Bloom & Renata Lemos & Raffaella Sadun & Daniela Scur & John Van Reenen, 2014. "The New Empirical Economics of Management," NBER Working Papers 20102, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:bmsmti:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:84-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.