IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A közoktatás-finanszírozási rendszer hatása az egyenlőségre, 1990 1997
[The effect on equality of the system of funding public education, 1990-97]

Author

Listed:
  • Varga, Júlia

Abstract

A települési önkormányzatok egyik legfontosabb feladata a közoktatási intézmények fenntartása. Az önkormányzati kiadások 30 százalékát az oktatási kiadások teszik ki, ennek zömét az általános iskolák működtetésére fordítja az önkormányzatok többsége, mivel 90 százalékuk csak általános iskolát, illetve csak általános iskolát és óvodát tart fenn. A tanulmány három kérdésre keresi a választ: 1. Először is azt vizsgálja, hogy milyen egyenlőtlenségek alakultak ki az általános iskolákat fenntartó önkormányzatok között az általános iskolai ráfordításokban, és az egyenlőtlenségek hogyan változtak az 1991 és 1997 közötti időszakban. 2. Majd azt tekinti át, hogy a közoktatás támogatási rendszere enyhítette-e a kiadásokban mutatkozó egyenlőtlenséget ugyanebben az időszakban. Mennyire volt szoros a kapcsolat az önkormányzatok gazdagsága és az oktatási ráfordítások között? 3. Végül, a támogatási rendszer általános iskolai kiadásokra gyakorolt hatását mutatja be, azt, hogy a támogatási rendszer erősítette vagy gyöngítette-e az eltérő vagyoni helyzetű (jövedelemtermelő képességű) önkormányzatok törekvéseit abban, hogy saját, a központi költségvetésen kívüli forrásaikat az iskoláztatás céljára fordítsák.

Suggested Citation

  • Varga, Júlia, 2000. "A közoktatás-finanszírozási rendszer hatása az egyenlőségre, 1990 1997 [The effect on equality of the system of funding public education, 1990-97]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 531-548.
  • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=337
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wyckoff, James H., 1992. "The intrastate equality of public primary and secondary education resources in the U.S., 1980-1987," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 19-30, March.
    2. McCarty, Therese A. & Brazer, Harvey E., 1990. "On equalizing school expenditures," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 251-264, September.
    3. Rune Sørensen, 1997. "Local Government School Priorities: Teaching Input and Class Size in Norway, 1980-1992," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 63-89.
    4. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. MONEE project, 1998. "Education for All?," Papers remore98/3, Regional Monitoring Report.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malczewski, Jacek & Jackson, Marlene, 2000. "Multicriteria spatial allocation of educational resources: an overview," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 219-235, September.
    2. Heyneman, Stephen P., 2004. "International education quality," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 441-452, August.
    3. World Bank, 2003. "Public Expenditure Review for Armenia," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15086, December.
    4. Suhrcke, Marc, 2000. "Are Reforms From a Centrally Planned to a Market System Bad for Health?," Discussion Paper Series 26142, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    5. Philippe Bayart & Rémy Herrera & Eric Mulot, 2006. "L'éducation dans la révolution : Le système éducatif cubain depuis la crise des années 1990," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques r06033, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    6. Reschovsky, Andrew, 1994. "Fiscal Equalization and School Finance," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 47(1), pages 185-97, March.
    7. Yeşilırmak, Muharrem, 2019. "Bonus pay for teachers, spatial sorting, and student achievement," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 129-158.
    8. World Bank, 2003. "Armenia : Public Expenditure Review," World Bank Publications - Reports 13926, The World Bank Group.
    9. Geremia Palomba & Milan Vodopivec, 2001. "Financing Efficiency and Equity in Albanian Education," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14024, December.
    10. Nancy Vandycke, 2001. "Access to Education for the Poor in Europe and Central Asia : Preliminary Evidence and Policy Implications," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13974, December.
    11. Aline Coudouel & John Micklewright & Sheila Marnie, 1998. "Targeting Social Assistance in a Transition Economy: the Mahallas in Uzbekistan," Papers iopeps98/4, Innocenti Occasional Papers, Economic Policy Series.
    12. Reschovsky, Andrew, 1994. "Fiscal Equalization and School Finance," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 47(1), pages 185-197, March.
    13. World Bank, 2003. "Poland - Toward a Fiscal Framework for Growth : A Public Expenditure and Institutional Review," World Bank Publications - Reports 14868, The World Bank Group.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I22 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Educational Finance; Financial Aid
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • H52 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Education
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.