Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The Mistreated Model: Some Technical Comments on Porojan's Paper on 'Trade Flows and Spatial Effects'


Author Info

  • Ron Johnston
  • Les Hepple
  • Tony Hoare
  • Kelvyn Jones
  • Paul Plummer


The paper by Porojan on 'Trade flows and spatial effects' in a recent issue of this journal is criticized on three methodological grounds: it includes two of the gravity model independent variables as relative rather than absolute numbers; the dummy variables included are not binary but interval; and the 'sample' of countries creates a non-normal distribution of inter-country distances, undoubtedly creating heteroscedasticity problems. Because of these three problems, the model is mis-specified, and the results thereby obtained are unreliable. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Springer in its journal Open Economies Review.

Volume (Year): 14 (2003)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Pages: 11-14

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:kap:openec:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:11-14

Contact details of provider:
Web page:

Related research

Keywords: trade; gravity model; mis-specification;


References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. A. Porojan, 2001. "Trade Flows and Spatial Effects: The Gravity Model Revisited," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 265-280, July.
  2. Jones, Kelvyn & Gould, Myles I. & Duncan, Craig, 2000. "Death and deprivation: an exploratory analysis of deaths in the Health and Lifestyle survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(7-8), pages 1059-1079, April.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Thomas Vanoutrive, 2011. "Modelling the link between port throughput and economic activity," ERSA conference papers ersa10p881, European Regional Science Association.
  2. Anca Carrington, 2003. "The Mistreated Model: A Reply," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 15-17, January.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:openec:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:11-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Guenther Eichhorn) or (Christopher F. Baum).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.