IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/netspa/v13y2013i3p283-306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Network Flows with Congestion-Based Flow Reductions

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas Bish
  • Edward Chamberlayne
  • Hesham Rakha

Abstract

When optimizing traffic systems using time-expanded network flow models, traffic congestion is an important consideration because it can decrease both the discharge traffic flow rate and speed. One widely used modeling framework is the Cell Transmission Model (CTM) (see Daganzo, Transp Res-B 28(4):269–287, 1994 , Transp Res-B 29(2):79–93, 1995 ), which is implemented in a linear program (LP) in Ziliaskopoulos (Transp Sci 34(1):37–49, 2000 ). While the CTM models the reduction in speed associated with congestion and the backward propagation of congestion, it does not properly model the reduction in discharge flow from a bottleneck after the onset of congestion. This paper discusses this issue and proposes a generalization of the CTM that takes into account this important phenomena. Plainly, an optimization that does not consider this important negative result of congestion can be problematic, e.g., in an evacuation setting such an optimization would assume that congestion does not impact network clearance time, which can result in poor evacuation strategies. In generalizing the CTM, a fairly simple modification is made, yet it can have significant impacts on the results. For instance, we show that for the generalized CTM the traffic holding (a result of the linearization of the CTM flow constraints) plays a more harmful role, which thus requires a scheme to eliminate traffic holding. In this paper, we propose a mixed binary program to eliminate traffic holding, along with methods to improve solvability. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas Bish & Edward Chamberlayne & Hesham Rakha, 2013. "Optimizing Network Flows with Congestion-Based Flow Reductions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 283-306, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:netspa:v:13:y:2013:i:3:p:283-306
    DOI: 10.1007/s11067-012-9181-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11067-012-9181-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11067-012-9181-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cassidy, Michael J. & Bertini, Robert L., 1999. "Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 25-42, February.
    2. Tao Yao & Supreet Mandala & Byung Chung, 2009. "Evacuation Transportation Planning Under Uncertainty: A Robust Optimization Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 171-189, June.
    3. Nie, Yu (Marco), 2011. "A cell-based Merchant-Nemhauser model for the system optimum dynamic traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 329-342, February.
    4. Malachy Carey, 1987. "Optimal Time-Varying Flows on Congested Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 58-69, February.
    5. Satish Ukkusuri & S. Waller, 2008. "Linear Programming Models for the User and System Optimal Dynamic Network Design Problem: Formulations, Comparisons and Extensions," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 383-406, December.
    6. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1995. "The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 79-93, April.
    7. Rakha, Hesham & Crowther, Brent, 2003. "Comparison and calibration of FRESIM and INTEGRATION steady-state car-following behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-27, January.
    8. Kai Nagel & Peter Wagner & Richard Woesler, 2003. "Still Flowing: Approaches to Traffic Flow and Traffic Jam Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 681-710, October.
    9. Byung Chung & Tao Yao & Chi Xie & Andreas Thorsen, 2011. "Robust Optimization Model for a Dynamic Network Design Problem Under Demand Uncertainty," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 371-389, June.
    10. Athanasios K. Ziliaskopoulos, 2000. "A Linear Programming Model for the Single Destination System Optimum Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 37-49, February.
    11. Paul I. Richards, 1956. "Shock Waves on the Highway," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 42-51, February.
    12. Kerner, Boris S. & Klenov, Sergey L., 2006. "Probabilistic breakdown phenomenon at on-ramp bottlenecks in three-phase traffic theory: Congestion nucleation in spatially non-homogeneous traffic," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 364(C), pages 473-492.
    13. Byung Chung & Tao Yao & Bo Zhang, 2012. "Dynamic Traffic Assignment under Uncertainty: A Distributional Robust Chance-Constrained Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 167-181, March.
    14. Daganzo, Carlos F., 1994. "The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 269-287, August.
    15. Papageorgiou, Markos, 1998. "Some remarks on macroscopic traffic flow modelling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 323-329, September.
    16. Hong K. Lo, 2001. "A Cell-Based Traffic Control Formulation: Strategies and Benefits of Dynamic Timing Plans," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 148-164, May.
    17. Mustafa Anil Yazici & Kaan Ozbay, 2008. "Evacuation Modelling in the United States: Does the Demand Model Choice Matter?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 757-779, March.
    18. Dion, Francois & Rakha, Hesham & Kang, Youn-Soo, 2004. "Comparison of delay estimates at under-saturated and over-saturated pre-timed signalized intersections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 99-122, February.
    19. Chung, Koohong & Rudjanakanoknad, Jittichai & Cassidy, Michael J., 2007. "Relation between traffic density and capacity drop at three freeway bottlenecks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 82-95, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David S. Dixon & Pallab Mozumder & William F. Vásquez & Hugh Gladwin, 2017. "Heterogeneity Within and Across Households in Hurricane Evacuation Response," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 645-680, June.
    2. Xiaozheng He & Srinivas Peeta, 2014. "Dynamic Resource Allocation Problem for Transportation Network Evacuation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 505-530, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bish, Douglas R. & Sherali, Hanif D., 2013. "Aggregate-level demand management in evacuation planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 79-92.
    2. Chou, Chang-Chi & Chiang, Wen-Chu & Chen, Albert Y., 2022. "Emergency medical response in mass casualty incidents considering the traffic congestions in proximity on-site and hospital delays," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Chi Xie & Jennifer Duthie, 2015. "An Excess-Demand Dynamic Traffic Assignment Approach for Inferring Origin-Destination Trip Matrices," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 947-979, December.
    4. Kontorinaki, Maria & Spiliopoulou, Anastasia & Roncoli, Claudio & Papageorgiou, Markos, 2017. "First-order traffic flow models incorporating capacity drop: Overview and real-data validation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 52-75.
    5. Xiaozheng He & Srinivas Peeta, 2014. "Dynamic Resource Allocation Problem for Transportation Network Evacuation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 505-530, December.
    6. Mohebifard, Rasool & Hajbabaie, Ali, 2019. "Optimal network-level traffic signal control: A benders decomposition-based solution algorithm," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 252-274.
    7. Jiancheng Long & Wai Yuen Szeto, 2019. "Link-Based System Optimum Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problems in General Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 167-182, January.
    8. Wang, Peirong (Slade) & Li, Pengfei (Taylor) & Chowdhury, Farzana R. & Zhang, Li & Zhou, Xuesong, 2020. "A mixed integer programming formulation and scalable solution algorithms for traffic control coordination across multiple intersections based on vehicle space-time trajectories," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 266-304.
    9. Hua Sun & Ziyou Gao & W. Szeto & Jiancheng Long & Fangxia Zhao, 2014. "A Distributionally Robust Joint Chance Constrained Optimization Model for the Dynamic Network Design Problem under Demand Uncertainty," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 409-433, December.
    10. Babak Javani & Abbas Babazadeh, 2020. "Path-Based Dynamic User Equilibrium Model with Applications to Strategic Transportation Planning," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 329-366, June.
    11. Ngoduy, D. & Hoang, N.H. & Vu, H.L. & Watling, D., 2016. "Optimal queue placement in dynamic system optimum solutions for single origin-destination traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 92(PB), pages 148-169.
    12. Islam, Tarikul & Vu, Hai L. & Hoang, Nam H. & Cricenti, Antonio, 2018. "A linear bus rapid transit with transit signal priority formulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 163-184.
    13. Kimms, A. & Maiwald, M., 2018. "Bi-objective safe and resilient urban evacuation planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1122-1136.
    14. Yeo, Hwasoo, 2008. "Asymmetric Microscopic Driving Behavior Theory," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1tn1m968, University of California Transportation Center.
    15. Carey, Malachy & Watling, David, 2012. "Dynamic traffic assignment approximating the kinematic wave model: System optimum, marginal costs, externalities and tolls," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 634-648.
    16. Kachani, Soulaymane & Perakis, Georgia, 2006. "Fluid dynamics models and their applications in transportation and pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 496-517, April.
    17. Jian Li & Kaan Ozbay, 2015. "Evacuation Planning with Endogenous Transportation Network Degradations: A Stochastic Cell-Based Model and Solution Procedure," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 677-696, September.
    18. van der Gun, Jeroen P.T. & Pel, Adam J. & van Arem, Bart, 2017. "Extending the Link Transmission Model with non-triangular fundamental diagrams and capacity drops," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 154-178.
    19. Samitha Samaranayake & Walid Krichene & Jack Reilly & Maria Laura Delle Monache & Paola Goatin & Alexandre Bayen, 2018. "Discrete-Time System Optimal Dynamic Traffic Assignment (SO-DTA) with Partial Control for Physical Queuing Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 982-1001, August.
    20. Long, Jiancheng & Szeto, W.Y. & Huang, Hai-Jun & Gao, Ziyou, 2015. "An intersection-movement-based stochastic dynamic user optimal route choice model for assessing network performance," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 182-217.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:netspa:v:13:y:2013:i:3:p:283-306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.