IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jmgtgv/v26y2022i3d10.1007_s10997-020-09553-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The governance of strategic networks: how do different configurations influence the performance of member firms?

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas Wegner

    (Unisinos University)

  • Greici Sarturi

    (Federal University of Santa Maria)

  • Leander Luiz Klein

    (Federal University of Santa Maria)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze how different configurations of network governance influence the performance of member firms. To achieve this objective, we surveyed 338 Brazilian firms participating in strategic networks (SNs). We addressed our research question by employing cluster analysis and the Kruskal–Wallis test. We focus the literature review on formal and relational governance of SNs and their interplay. We found three clusters that illustrate different configurations of governance. One cluster is characterized by relatively high levels of formal and relational governance in small and young SNs. A second cluster is characterized by low levels of formal governance and relatively high levels of relational governance, but surprisingly in larger and older SNs. The third cluster is characterized by relatively low levels of formal and relational governance in small and young SNs. Our main results illustrate different configurations of governance of SNs. Small and young SNs that combined high levels of formal and relational governance also present the highest levels of firm performance. Surprisingly, larger and older SNs followed a governance configuration based on high levels of relational governance and low levels of formal governance. These findings direct to new configurations of network governance that are controversial to existing literature and also offer managerial contributions. We contribute to the debate about formal and relational governance by adding two new variables to the analysis—network size and network age. Results show that SNs with different size and age may adopt distinct governance configurations.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas Wegner & Greici Sarturi & Leander Luiz Klein, 2022. "The governance of strategic networks: how do different configurations influence the performance of member firms?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(3), pages 1063-1087, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jmgtgv:v:26:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10997-020-09553-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10997-020-09553-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10997-020-09553-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10997-020-09553-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikalef, Patrick & Pateli, Adamantia, 2017. "Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-16.
    2. Tugba Gurcaylilar-Yenidogan & Josef Windsperger, 2015. "Complementarity Between Formal and Relational Governance Mechanisms in Inter-organizational Networks: Combining Resource-Based and Relational Governance Perspectives," Springer Books, in: Josef Windsperger & Gérard Cliquet & Thomas Ehrmann & Georg Hendrikse (ed.), Interfirm Networks, edition 127, pages 229-248, Springer.
    3. Douglas Wegner & Kadígia Faccin & Pietro Cunha Dolci, 2018. "Opening the black box of small-firm networks: governance mechanisms and their impact on social capital," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 35(4), pages 559-578.
    4. Siv Vangen & John Paul Hayes & Chris Cornforth, 2015. "Governing Cross-Sector, Inter-Organizational Collaborations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1237-1260, October.
    5. David A Griffith & Matthew B Myers, 2005. "The performance implications of strategic fit of relational norm governance strategies in global supply chain relationships," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 36(3), pages 254-269, May.
    6. Gabriella Levanti, 2018. "Governing Complex Strategic Networks: Emergence Versus Enabling Effects," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Gandolfo Dominici & Manlio Del Giudice & Rosa Lombardi (ed.), Governing Business Systems, chapter 0, pages 49-65, Springer.
    7. Cai, Shaohan & Yang, Zhilin & Hu, Zuohao, 2009. "Exploring the governance mechanisms of quasi-integration in buyer-supplier relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 660-666, June.
    8. Kevin Zheng Zhou & Laura Poppo, 2010. "Exchange hazards, relational reliability, and contracts in China: The contingent role of legal enforceability," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(5), pages 861-881, June.
    9. Akbar Zaheer & Bill McEvily & Vincenzo Perrone, 1998. "Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 141-159, April.
    10. Douglas Wegner & Clara Isabel Koetz & Eduardo De Oliveira Wilk, 2013. "Social capital in Brazilian small-firm networks: the influence on business performance," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(4), pages 446-461.
    11. Gregory G. Dess & Richard B. Robinson, 1984. "Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately‐held firm and conglomerate business unit," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 265-273, July.
    12. Kevin Zheng Zhou & Dean Xu, 2012. "How foreign firms curtail local supplier opportunism in China: Detailed contracts, centralized control, and relational governance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 43(7), pages 677-692, September.
    13. Elisabeth Mueller, 2012. "How to manage networks? The role of network attributes and incentives in network governance," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 57-75.
    14. Engelen, Andreas & Kube, Harald & Schmidt, Susanne & Flatten, Tessa Christina, 2014. "Entrepreneurial orientation in turbulent environments: The moderating role of absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1353-1369.
    15. Majid Abdi & Preet S Aulakh, 2012. "Do country-level institutional frameworks and interfirm governance arrangements substitute or complement in international business relationships?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 43(5), pages 477-497, June.
    16. Paul S. Adler, 2001. "Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 215-234, April.
    17. Dekker, Henri C., 2004. "Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 27-49, January.
    18. Jeffrey H. Dyer & Harbir Singh & William S. Hesterly, 2018. "The relational view revisited: A dynamic perspective on value creation and value capture," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(12), pages 3140-3162, December.
    19. Pertusa-Ortega, Eva M. & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio & Claver-Cortés, Enrique, 2010. "Can formalization, complexity, and centralization influence knowledge performance?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 310-320, March.
    20. Martina Dal Molin & Cristina Masella, 2016. "Networks in policy, management and governance: a comparative literature review to stimulate future research avenues," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 20(4), pages 823-849, December.
    21. Pugliese, Amedeo & Minichilli, Alessandro & Zattoni, Alessandro, 2014. "Integrating agency and resource dependence theory: Firm profitability, industry regulation, and board task performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1189-1200.
    22. Akbar Zaheer & N. Venkatraman, 1995. "Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 373-392.
    23. Douglas Wegner & Clara Koetz, 2016. "The influence of network governance mechanisms on the performance of small firms," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 27(4), pages 463-479.
    24. Ranjay Gulati & Jack A. Nickerson, 2008. "Interorganizational Trust, Governance Choice, and Exchange Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(5), pages 688-708, October.
    25. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12131 is not listed on IDEAS
    26. Carrie R. Leana & Frits K. Pil, 2006. "Social Capital and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Urban Public Schools," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 353-366, June.
    27. Oliver Schilke & Karen S. Cook, 2015. "Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 276-297, February.
    28. Bernard Garrette & Pierre Dussauge & Will Mitchell, 2000. "Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia," Post-Print hal-00458812, HAL.
    29. Lumineau, Fabrice & Malhotra, Deepak, 2011. "Shadow of the contract: how contract structure shapes inter-firm dispute resolution," MPRA Paper 38359, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    30. Josef Windsperger & George W. J. Hendrikse & Gerard Cliquet & Thomas Ehrmann, 2018. "Governance and strategy of entrepreneurial networks: an introduction," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 671-676, April.
    31. Laura Poppo & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Todd R. Zenger, 2008. "Examining the Conditional Limits of Relational Governance: Specialized Assets, Performance Ambiguity, and Long‐Standing Ties," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(7), pages 1195-1216, November.
    32. Sascha Albers, 2010. "Configurations of Alliance Governance Systems," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 62(3), pages 204-233, July.
    33. Josef Windsperger & George Hendrikse & Gérard Cliquet & Thomas Ehrmann, 2018. "Governance and strategy of entrepreneurial networks: an introduction," Post-Print halshs-02024277, HAL.
    34. Imen Khanchel, 2007. "Corporate governance: measurement and determinant analysis," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 22(8), pages 740-760, September.
    35. Daniela Cristofoli & Josip Markovic & Marco Meneguzzo, 2014. "Governance, management and performance in public networks: How to be successful in shared-governance networks," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(1), pages 77-93, February.
    36. Kaisa Henttonen & Katja Lahikainen & Tiina Jauhiainen, 2016. "Governance Mechanisms in Multi-Party Non-Profit Collaboration," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, March.
    37. Pierre Dussauge & Bernard Garrette & Will Mitchell, 2000. "Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 99-126, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fang, F., 2019. "When performance shortfall arises, contract or trust? A multi-method study of the impact of contractual and relational governances on performance in public – private partnerships," Other publications TiSEM 473840ee-6945-4a93-9326-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Joanita Kataike & Xavier Gellynck, 2018. "22 Years of Governance Structures and Performance: What Has Been Achieved in Agrifood Chains and Beyond? A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-32, March.
    3. Lumineau, Fabrice & Jin, Jason Lu & Sheng, Shibin & Zhou, Kevin Zheng, 2022. "Asset specificity asymmetry and supplier opportunism in buyer–supplier exchanges," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 85-100.
    4. Bill McEvily & Akbar Zaheer & Darcy K. Fudge Kamal, 2017. "Mutual and Exclusive: Dyadic Sources of Trust in Interorganizational Exchange," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 74-92, February.
    5. Liwen Wang, 2023. "The interplay of contracts and trust: untangling between- and within-dyad effects," Post-Print hal-03944358, HAL.
    6. Kolloge, Konstantin, 2009. "Die Messung des Kooperationserfolges in der empirischen Forschung: Ergebnisse einer Literaturstudie," Arbeitspapiere 76, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    7. Zhi Cao & Yuan Li & Jayanth Jayaram & Yi Liu & Fabrice Lumineau, 2018. "A meta-analysis of the exchange hazards–interfirm governance relationship: An informal institutions perspective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(3), pages 303-323, April.
    8. Dovev Lavie & Randi Lunnan & Binh Minh T. Truong, 2022. "How does a partner's acquisition affect the value of the firm's alliance with that partner?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(9), pages 1897-1926, September.
    9. Laura Poppo & Kevin Zheng Zhou & Julie J. Li, 2016. "When can you trust “trust”? Calculative trust, relational trust, and supplier performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 724-741, April.
    10. Shichao Sun & Xin Ran & Xuanya Shi, 2023. "The Preference of Inter-Organizational Trust on Corporate Benefit-Seeking Behaviors: A Mechanisms-Based and Policy-Capturing Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Dorn, Stefanie & Schweiger, Bastian & Albers, Sascha, 2016. "Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: A systematic literature review and research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 484-500.
    12. Stienstra, Miranda, 2020. "The determinants and performance implications of alliance partner acquisition," Other publications TiSEM 7fdee0c2-d4d2-4f5b-95e3-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Huo, Baofeng & Ye, Yuxiao & Zhao, Xiande, 2015. "The impacts of trust and contracts on opportunism in the 3PL industry: The moderating role of demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 160-170.
    14. Ellegaard, Chris & Medlin, Christopher J., 2018. "Finding good relationships – intended and realized relational governance of international fine wine exchanges," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 794-805.
    15. Matthias Fink & Isabella Hatak & Reinhard Schulte & Sascha Kraus, 2011. "Verträge, Vertrauen und Unternehmenserfolg in Automobilclustern," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 63(7), pages 689-710, November.
    16. Ralph A. Heidl & H. Kevin Steensma & Corey Phelps, 2014. "Divisive Faultlines and the Unplanned Dissolutions of Multipartner Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1351-1371, October.
    17. Ebers, Mark & Semrau, Thorsten, 2015. "What drives the allocation of specific investments between buyer and supplier?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 415-424.
    18. Zahoor, Nadia & Al-Tabbaa, Omar, 2021. "Post-entry internationalization speed of SMEs: The role of relational mechanisms and foreign market knowledge," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    19. Weber, Clarissa E. & Maurer, Indre, 2023. "Knowledge acquisition from host-country partners: The interplay of trust and legal safeguards," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(2).
    20. Janowicz, M.K. & Noorderhaven, N.G., 2002. "The Role of Trust in Interorganizational Learning in Joint Ventures," Discussion Paper 2002-119, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jmgtgv:v:26:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10997-020-09553-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.